ipl-logo

What Were Some Of The Different Types Of Crimes

1283 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Crime in the elizabethan 1 era

What were some of the different types of crimes that could be committed?
Crimes in medieval times ranged from minor crimes to serious crimes. Minor offences someone could do might be be stealing firewood from the lord’s forest, nagging one’s husband, gossiping, cheating on customers, arguing, animals damaging crops and priests committing crimes. More major crimes included witchcraft, murder, treason (the crime of not being loyal to the monarch.), and heresy.
What was trial by ordeal? Was it reliable?
Before jury trials, people’s guilt or innocence was decided by things such as witnesses, battles or ordeals. Trial by ordeal was a way which people could let God decide what would happen. By using the two elements fire and water, they were able …show more content…

Minor crimes committed like letting an animal damage another’s crops or stealing firewood would usually result in having to pay a fine to the lord or doing extra work for him. Another common punishment was to put the person in the stocks or pillory in the centre of the town. These punishments were carried out in public, so that they could show other people what would happen if they were to commit the same crime or a similar come. They were also done so that the victim would be humiliated, as they were often spat on and had rotten food thrown at them. It was ongoing shame for the victim if they were staying in the same community.
Priests who committed minor crimes were forced to wear a paper crown and ride backwards on a horse. They were then paraded out on the streets for the public to see. Shopkeepers also had to face punishments when selling items which were not up to standard. For example if brewer sold bad ale, they would be forced to drink some of it and the rest would be poured over their head. This would be done in the centre of the town for the public to see and for the victim to be …show more content…

Church courts controlled people’s morals and their behaviour. Penalties for committing such crimes would included being fined and sometimes being whipped. Being whipped was done due to someone working on Sunday rather than devoting that time to prayer and attending church. The most serious crime which the church courts heard, was the crime of heresy (the offence of criticising the church’s teachings). The accused was normally tortured then burned to death after officially being guilty. Church courts also heard cases which involved fighting between husbands and wives. Women were the ones punished as the judges’ assumed that the women had tempted the men into wrongdoing. The men involved were not part of it at all.
People who committed minor crimes were usually taken to manor courts where punishments were decided. If required the accused was allowed to give evidence as to whether they had or had not committed the crime. If you were found guilty of committing a minor crime, you would usually be fined or would have to do extra work for the lord. Another punishment for people was to make them humiliated by pushing them in the stocks or pillory in the centre of the town (*see above in the ‘…punishments..’ question for a bit more

Show More
Related
1241 Words | 5 Pages

POLITICAL • Tawantinsuyu: Inca government, monarchy, ruled by the Sapa Inca • Sapa Inca: emperor and king of the Inca Empire, means “sole ruler”, most powerful person in the empire • Coya: wife and queen of Sapa Inca • Government Organization: - Viceroy: most trusted and closest advisor to the Sapa Inca, usually a close relative - High Priest: thought to be second in power due to the heavily regarded importance on religion - Governors of a Quarter: Inca Empire divided into four quarters, each ruled by a governor called an Apu - Council of the Realm: council made up of powerful, noble men who advised the Sapa Inca on important matters and assisted in major problems - Inspectors: people who were in charge to watch over the townspeople to make sure they paid their taxes -

Read More
1651 Words | 7 Pages

In 1757, a sailor who was convicted of sexually assaulting a young male received a beating of 500 lashes, while in 1762, two men received 1000 lashes each for engaging in consensual sex, and in 1806, there were more hangings in England for sodomy than there were for murder offences. Chapter 3 of Rum, Sodomy and the Lash stresses the differences between a pirate’s trial versus a sodomist’s trial in court. Turley explains that pirates are economic criminals, and their crimes directly threaten property. At the same time, sodomites do not put the public in danger but rather challenge the separation between males and females and are no longer a part of the domestic economy and are instead a threat to society’s economic order. It is evident that sodomy was viewed as the worst offence and did not protect the public from real, dangerous

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

Accused and Betrayed Throughout the late 1600’s women had been accused of being a part of witchcraft. In this time women went through many disgusting torture treatments and got charged with many different things. When a women had been accused she would be “treated” with many different types of torture until they had died or had admitted to doing witchcraft. Some of the tortures were called: “The Garotte”,” Dunking the Witch”, and “The Boots”.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

In these trials people

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

In Jeff Jacoby’s “Bring Back Flogging,” he compares the punishments for crimes in the 17th Century to the punishments for crimes in the present. Jacoby suggests in his essay that “the Puritans were more enlightened than we think, at least on the subject of punishment. Their sanctions were humiliating and painful, but quick and cheap.” Jacoby makes a good argument to bring back an old punishment policy. He points out that “a humiliating and painful paddling can be applied to the rear end of a crook for a lot less than $30,000 (per year).”

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

When visiting the general court, people learn the extremely unfair power the judge had, and the cruel punishments he could give. For example, if you stole something small you would be put to trial and argue your case. He would the ask witnesses what they saw, but he could completely overrule them. If you were found guilty, you would get a hot iron stamp would be pressed onto your skin, leaving a permanent burn mark, identifying you as a thief. If you were ever put to trial again, you would have no more chances, and be hanged.

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

The Code includes crimes such as stealing , cheating, as well as lying. The punishment for these crimes varied from having an ear cut off to even

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

Other lawbreakers were positioned in the stocks with a sign fastened on their neck, which had the name of their misdemeanor written on it. Bystanders would hurl decomposing, putrid vegetables and fruit at the impotent, unfortunate sufferers sweltering in the stocks. For crimes not as serious, the wrongdoers didn’t have quite as painful punishments. A woman would be tethered to a stool and head would be submerged in water, if she argued with her husband. At school, the teacher would wallop audacious children who misbehaved.

Read More
1778 Words | 8 Pages

This struck a fear through the whole town. Everyone became scared of being named a witch. After the witches were accused, there were trials in the courtroom to determine their guilt. If they were found guilty, they were punished. The majority of the retributions were by hanging, some also died in jail, and one was stoned to death.

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

(Brooks, pg. 76). Trial by ordeal was commonly used. People would be put to trials to see if they were guilty or not. For example, a woman had to carry a red hot iron for three steps. After three days, if the burn was larger than the size of a walnut, then she would be guilty.

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

This essay will mention some of the crimes and punishments; it will also explain the differences between the medieval times and the modern times. Crime Crimes for people to commit in the Medieval times was easier for people to commit than. Most of the crimes were very so unnecessary that even lighting a fire can cause big times. Some of the crimes committed in the Medieval times were Theft which means to steal something from another person, Arson which means to light fire in public, Witchcraft means to practise magic such as black magic and a use of spells, Heresay/blasphemy means disrespect towards god because in the Medieval times they looked up to god a lot and they would make big discussions by asking god in a way people would not know. Treason which is traitor to the crown (king), Vagrancy means homelessness which in the medieval times was very common for people that work or the king such as peasants.

Read More
1075 Words | 5 Pages

Public executions occured so frequently to the point where they were seen as the norm, with

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

While we prefer life in jail, they preferred death. To conclude, a significant extent of the nature of crime and punishment changed between social classes and over the years since the Medieval Period. This is seen through the significant groups that were involved in medieval crime and punishment, the effects of a person’s social class on crime and punishment, the sort of crime each punishment was used for and the difference between crime and punishments between the Medieval Period and today. The Medieval Period lasted from 476 CE to 1453 CE, with different punishments for each crime committed by different social

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

There were no police in the era. They had the watch which were armed citizens under control of the sheriff. The most common crimes were, theft, cut purses, begging and poaching. Theft was a very bad crime in those times, they would have great punishment if found guilty. Tortures would follow for crimes when committed.

Read More
1487 Words | 6 Pages

Crucifixion was the capital punishment during ancient times (Roman Empire). Overtime, slaves gained limited legal protection. During the Hadrian Era, it was believed that a master should not hold the power of life and death over a slave (Roman Empire). An owner that killed his slave without just cause was considered a murderer, as they should have been. Overtime, a slave could even complain of mistreatment and appear in court to appeal against his

Read More

More about What Were Some Of The Different Types Of Crimes

Related Topics

Open Document