ipl-logo

Memorandum Of Advice (Amendment 35P)

1380 Words6 Pages

Memorandum of Advice
Short Answer

John Doe (“John”) seeks to invalidate Amendment 35P(1) of the National Security Legislation Amendment Bill (“the Bill”) on the basis that it infringes the implied Constitutional freedom of communication on governmental and political matters in Australia (“the Freedom of Political Communication”).

It will be shown that Amendment 35P(1), while effectively burdening the Freedom of Political Communication, will likely be found to be reasonably necessary to achieve its legitimate legislative purpose, hence avoiding invalidation.

A favourable outcome based on current law is unlikely for John in a constitutional challenge. A mitigation plea is advised instead to minimize penalty rather than seeking to avoid …show more content…

Offenders face imprisonment for 5 years. Statutory defences exist under Amendment 35P(3), but do not include an exception for media reporting.

To avoid liability, John wishes to challenge the constitutional validity of Amendment 35P(1) on the basis that it infringes the Freedom of Political Communication.

Issues Arising

Whether Amendment 35P(1) is consitutionally invalid because it impermissibly burdens the Freedom of Political Communication, contrary to the Commonwealth Constitution.

The Freedom of Political Communication

While there is no express protection afforded by the Commonwealth Consitution for a general freedom of speech in Australia, the freedom of communication on matters of government and politics is an indispensible incident of the system of representative government that the Constitution creates. It is implied from the system of representative government enshrined in ss 7 and 24 of the Constitution. The Freedom of Political Communication is not a personal right. Rather, it is a restriction placed upon legislature against enacting laws that burden political …show more content…

As a body established by a statute of the Commonwealth in connection with the protection of national security, the ASIO is a government body. Information relating to it and SIOs thus throw “light on governmental or political matters” and posses the ability to influence decisions at the polls. Therefore the reporting of ASIO information constitutes communication protected by the Freedom of Political Communication.

(2) Amendment 35P(1) Factually and hence Effectively Burdens the Freedom of Political Communication

Amendment 35P(1) proscribes communications to the public by the media, by criminalizing the reporting of such matters without providing a media defence. Its operation deters and “chills” media coverage on ASIO matters that consitute political communications. It therefore factually burdens the Freedom of Political Communication.

By factually burdening the Freedom of Political Communication, Amendment 35P(1) effectively burdens the Freedom of Political Communication answering the first Lange question in the

Show More
Related
688 Words | 3 Pages

In this case, Vicki lee roach had been serving 6 years in prison for negligently causing a car accident. Q2. Which right(s) was infringed? How was the right(s) infringed? Roach has challenged the effectiveness of the 2006 amendments made to the electoral act 1918 (cth) by the passage of the electoral and referendum amendment act 2006 (cth).

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction McCloy considered the validity of provisions in Election Funding, Expenditures and Disclosed act 1981 (NSW) ("the EFED Act.") and it has been accepted that restrictions on donations to candidates and parties is constitutional. This paper analyses the implications of the McCloy for the implied freedom of political communication.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

In meaning, nonetheless, through a well-known vote, has the ability to totally control the legislature. Along these lines, adjustments must be made to equitable government to shield the greater part from persecuting minority gatherings or acting against the benefit

Read More
143 Words | 1 Pages

The High Court of Australia had unanimously held that there was an implied freedom of political communication where the Australian constitution consists of a system of responsible governments that can only become effective if Australian citizens have a constitutional right to freely communicated on government and political matters. There are 2 limbs in the test derived from the case of Lange v Australian Broadcasting Commission. CITE The first limb is whether the law burdens the freedom to political communication on government and political matters, the second limb is whether the law is consistent and appropriate towards the system of representative and responsible government. In order to determined whether the law is valid or invalid, if

Read More
2356 Words | 10 Pages

The Executive Branch can curb the Legislative Branch

Read More
1134 Words | 5 Pages

Having these communications protected, it saves those that were damaged through violence and his opinion promotes violence. However, majority of the court stood by section 181 that he was convicted of the spread of false information breaching section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Right and Freedoms, thus denying Zundel's

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

It is now known that the hearings were in fact, not fair, “In judicial affairs, for example, support for free speech and other civil liberties eroded significantly.” stated

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

Legislatures have very broad discretion to create and pass laws that prohibit, regulate, and encourage a wide variety of activities. In Article I, Section 8, ofthe U.S. Constitution, Congress is empowered to "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper" for carrying out its enumerated powers. Most state legislatures are empowered by similar language from their state constitution. An example of a proper exercise of legislative discretion is to make Stalking a crime and to make that crime punishable by fines or imprisonment.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

This section is an extension of the privacy act. It states that you have the right to say what you may. However, it is the same way with the freedom of speech. You are allowed to express your opinion on multiple topics. You cannot say anything that is sensitive or may cause a rally or fight.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Everyone in America has this right, and it is used very frequently. In America, we can say whatever we want to the government

Read More
1204 Words | 5 Pages

The theory also discusses falsehoods and their place in the marketplace of ideas. The theory places falsehoods as a very important part of the marketplace, because falsehoods contribute to the integrity of the truths. The article then goes on to discuss the importance of Intellectual Freedom and Freedom of Speech in democracy. Oltmann states that Freedom of Speech is necessary to democracy because it allows the circulation of free thought and opinions that then lead to political involvement of Americans. The source then discusses the place that the library and IF

Read More
1354 Words | 6 Pages

Though as per the Judgment the right cannot be exercised when it is a particular issue is of public interest , there are serious loopholes in the Judgment which makes it difficult to guard essential public interest. The judgment entirely fails to deals with crucial questions where there is need to decide what would be the basis for deciding whether particular information is in public interest or not? Who is to be held accountable if the information regarding public interest is indeed removed? Upon whom does the burden of proof lies when it comes to deciding public

Read More
1116 Words | 5 Pages

It says: there should be the right to speak freely in parliament. Proviso (2) further gives that no individual from Parliament might be subject to any procedures in any court in appreciation of anything said or any vote given by him in parliament or any advisory group thereof. No activity, common or criminal, will in this manner lie against a part for slander or the like in appreciation of things said in parliament or its advisory groups. The safety is not constrained to insignificant talked words; it stretches out to votes, as condition (2) particularly proclaims, viz. any vote given by him in parliament or any advisory group thereof.

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Malaysian has the right to freedom of speech which is guaranteed by Article 10 of the Constitution of Malaysia. The Article 10 allows all citizens the absolute freedom as not restricted by the government. In Malaysia, Law such as Publications act and printing presses give the Malaysian authorities the control over all the media. Any act that against this law may lead to fines or in much extreme cases, prison sentence. Although Malaysia has the right to freedom of speech, the media are still being controlled by the government which restrict them to publish anything against the government.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

As human beings, we are all born with an entitlement of freedom of speech or synonymously known as freedom of expression as it is a basic human right. It is stated in the Federal Constitution and it is important for us human beings to protect our rights to freedom of speech and expression as it is the backbone for a democratic society. Having the right to express oneself freely without any restrictions is an essential part of what it means to be a free human being. Article 10 in the Federal Constitution states that; (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression; (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) all citizens have the right to form associations.

Read More

More about Memorandum Of Advice (Amendment 35P)

Related Topics

Open Document