Methodology During The Tuskegee Study

Methodology The author utilized excessive methodology throughout his book during the Tuskegee Experiment Study. Throughout the study, the helping professionals had many challenges and made changes when conducting this experiment. During this time, the helping professionals had no legal guidelines or stipulations until the last few years of the study. In the book, there were several methodologies that were utilized during the experiment. The methodologies consist of physicians that conducted a study or knowledgeable about the diseases, evidenced-based literature reviews, experiments, laboratory blood work, X-rays, drugs, and educational programs. Before the study began, the physicians had to persuade and consult the authorities to give them

However, some of the men had to be turned down because their test result was positive for syphilis. Furthermore, after the news spread, there were constantly 407 men that requested the pills that were “pink medicine.” Eventually, the government doctors began disposing iron tonic for the men that were examined. The men were unaware that the pills disposed to them were placebo. On the other hand, the dependent variable is the men that were not treated. Eventually, the researchers cooperated a control group in their study. The control group consisted of the men that were previously involved in the study last winter. The researcher selected two hundred of the men that were between certain ages and examine them. Also, this group of men did not have syphilis. Although, some of the men had to be turned down because their test result were positive for syphilis. The outcome of the groups is that the syphilitic group and the untreated group were affected the most due to fatal deaths. However, the control group was not affected by the disease (Jones,

For instance, the practitioners are obligated to constantly inform the participants about plans that pertains to interventions (Reamer, 1987). In addition, it is essential for informed consent to include the following: “What is done, the reasons for doing it, clients must be capable of providing consent, they must have the right to refuse or withdraw consent, and their decisions must be based on adequate information” (Kirk & Wakefield, 1997, p. 275). One of the most dehumanizing incidents that occur is the researchers prohibit the participants’ self-determination. For example, the men were compliant with receiving treatment and to be examined by the physicians. However, the physicians did not reveal the actual purpose of the study. Consequently, penicillin was the most effective medication, but the doctors decided to withhold treatment (Bozeman, Hirsch, & Slade ,