ipl-logo

Michael Huemer's Argument Analysis

212 Words1 Pages
Michael Huemer believes that the social contract theory is invalid and doesn’t provide enough information about the justifications of authority, and I agree with his claim. Most of the population in the United States today never give consent to the government. A valid consent would need to have an opt out option available. Citizens should have the option to reject policies if wanted. One example of this is in our health insurance. All citizens are required by law to have insurance. This law doesn’t provide consent from the people. There is no opt out option. The option of leaving our country is technically an opt out, but this is not a reasonable option. For every law or bill passed, is it reasonable that if you disagree with anything passed
Open Document