ipl-logo

Military Force: Is It Possible Or Unreasonable?

668 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Positive consequences of civil war

The use of military force (depending on the situation) is reasonable, but it can also be very unreasonable. The situation at hand is the civil war in Syria and the production and use of chemical weapons. I think it would be reasonable if we attacked only if we were to be attacked but we could invade as well to prevent any further harm if necessary. The only problem with acting is that we might start a war from which would start an increase in taxes as well as casualties in the war at hand. I think that it is reasonable because it might prevent future casualties a possible war with the cost of our own troops. Others would argue and say no that it is unreasonable and that we need to keep our nose out of other people 's business. Then what if there wrong and we get attacked unexpected and thrusted into war just because we wouldn 't prevent any further conflict. …show more content…

here are some pros and cons of taking action Another good example is the war of 1812 we only fought in the war because Great Britain cut off all our supply routes by sea so we had no choice but to fight against Britain in the war. After the war Britain and France had, Britain focused on the U.S. and attacked several places. Little did Britain know we were trying to take control of their capital in Canada to

Show More
Related
654 Words | 3 Pages

1812 marks the year President Madison, member of the Democratic-Republican party, asked Congress to declare war on the greatest naval power in the world; Great Britain. The tensions between these two nations came as a result of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. The factors of Great Britain forcing impressment and infringing maritime rights, appealing to American nationalism, and President Madison’s political motivations all added up to equal the War of 1812. Since America remained neutral, Britain did everything in their power to assure the United States suffered many costly defeats at the hands of Canadian, Native American, and British troops, and also made trading with the French nearly inaccessible. The ocean is a highway

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

The war of independence was fought from 1775-1782. In the beginning, it was largely believed that Britain would be successful. However, the Americans proved to be victorious in the end, overcoming many challenges that were thrown their way. The biggest threat to their independence was simply the strength of the British.

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

The War of 1812 was the first invasion in American history. It was also the first time the U.S had ever declared on another country, which was signed on June 18, 1812 by President James Madison. Though congress eventually voted on war, both the House and Senate were severely divided. Federalists opposed the war because they believed they used it to promote their expansionist agenda. There were multiple causes of the war, Britain’s restrictions of U.S trade by the Orders in Council, the British navy capturing American seamen and forcing them to serve on the behalf of the British, and America’s desire for expansion.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

Even Iraq was experiencing human rights abuses, as well as Vietnam when it got involved with communism. Granted, some interventions are more difficult to swallow than others, but the fact that Americans are eager and able to prevent human suffering, regardless of their secondary interests, should not be referred to as unnecessary acts of

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

Similarly, the President ordinarily enjoys broader authority and initiative in foreign affairs. If Congress can constrain the President's use of his inherent Commander in Chief or foreign affairs powers, it follows that Congress can apply at least as strong constraints to the removal power, an unenumerated, allegedly inherent, domestic power. What this has resulted in is the essential ability of the President to order forces into hostilities to repel invasion or counter an attack, without a formal declaration of war. A declaration of war by the Congress places the Unites States at war, but absent a declaration of war, the President can react to acts of war in an expedient fashion as he sees fit.

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

In many honest opinions, the war did not necessarily need America to get involved. Although, yellow journalism at the time and the supposed attack on a US ship were rising actions to America intervening. Once America entered the war, there was no turning back. Questions and concerns arose quickly amongst US citizens and officials on the future of the new colonies. Some Americans wanted to fight the war to lead change domestically; African Americans in particular.

Read More
147 Words | 1 Pages

So why should I give up these rights that have been long fought for. We come from a diverse nation and we should be able to find other ways to fight terrorism other than sacrificing our liberties. Our civil liberties take precedence. The rights of the people in America should not be invaded upon because these rights are warranted. If our rights are invaded it not only oversteps the

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

The people of the United States of America would not allow for themselves to be attacked and not defend their home. The very next

Read More
224 Words | 1 Pages

To make a decision to go to war with someone or country for that matter  is not something that is made lightly. When Germany was declaring war on everyone around them such as Russia, France, and then sinking ships such as American passenger ships and American cargo ships and attempting to make an alliance with Mexico and promising the US to Mexico got the attention of President Wilson. He was all for staying out of the wars among the European countries but could no longer stand idly by watching our people and good being destroyed and not to mention Germany taking a bold move to stop all entries to and from the western borders of Great Britain and Ireland. I believe he was justified as we had interests in that part of the world that would

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

Some of the actions that the U.S. took was the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, going into nations that were controlled by the Soviets to fight back, and had the wrong motives. The United States actions during the cold war were not justified, because of the motives that they had behind their actions which were selfish and did not think about everyone else, these actions also caused more aggression. The U.S made the decision to drop a bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The U.S dropped the bomb because they wanted the fighting to be over in Japan and they wanted them to surrender without having to have any American soldiers step in and lose American lives.

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

Gun Control: Assault Weapons Should be Banned in America In the past decade there have been many mass shootings which sparked a nationwide debate on the ban on assault weapons. Assault weapons are Semiautomatic weapons that are usually used in the military due to their advanced features. The difference between a Semiautomatic weapon and a regular pistol is that semiautomatic guns reload automatically and can fire consistently (Assault Weapons). Majority of Americans argue that Assault Weapons should be banned nationwide because of the amount of mass shootings caused by Assault weapons.

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

It’s right for the United States to fight back to and maintain the peace in the Middle East and beyond. (War against Iraq was necessary to protect the world from terrorism). That is why I think the United States is right to invade

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

No, we shouldn’t do everything in our power if it risks war and civilian deaths. We should try to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons without going as far as doing military strikes and risk another war and more American soldiers dying when we could have prevented it. I believe that if form policy fails the U.S should try to get rid of the regime when will promote stability in Iran, so it can grow as a country and not be vulnerable to regimes like the one in Iran and be able to defend itself from terrorist organization and regimes that don’t support the balance in the country and so that should an organization like Isis moves from syria toward Iran and other countries that produce oil and other things that make bombs. In short the domestic

Read More
1240 Words | 5 Pages

This type of War Doctrine attempts to prevent a future attack by attacking ones opponent first. Pre-emption is commonly viewed as equivalent to self-defense. Pre-emption must be permitted by the United Nations; otherwise it goes against international law, it is considered legitimate because it can be classified under self-defense. The intention when using a Pre-emptive strike is to gain and advantage over the opposing actor. Pre-emption has been used, and has both a success and fail rate.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Recently, the controversy over the future of these weapons has sparked an interest in many debates, whether to allow them or outlaw them. The result of these disputes can affect our nation, so it is of the utmost importance to create an analytically acceptable solution. To this degree, it is critically important to properly implement a solution before causing an erroneous mistake. A reasonable approach to dealing with such arduous challenges is to properly understand its benefits and the risks that caused by this debatable, but

Read More

More about Military Force: Is It Possible Or Unreasonable?

Related Topics

Open Document