The articles “Millennials In The Workplace: They Don't Need Trophies But They Want Reinforcement ” by Jeff Fromm (2015), and “Millennial Employees: Are They That Different?” by Kirsten Asher (2016) discuss how millennials are a force to be reckoned with their out-of-the-box thinkings. Despite having similar arguments, their methods of delivery were vastly varied in terms of structure, tone and the reliability of the evidence provided. The article that stood out more will be the one by Jeff Fromm where he provided a more plausible argument in a clear and coherent fashion with concrete reasoning and logical arguments as compared to Kirsten’s essay which mainly consisted her personal opinions. Fromm is evidently a more compelling writer whereby …show more content…
However, this does not exactly make her an expert in critiquing the topic of millennials and their behavioural traits. Hence this further proves that compared to Fromm, Asher has a lower level of knowledge about Millennials which then proves that she is less reliable as compared to …show more content…
Fromm’s essay was written in a more relatable tone whereby he tries to appeal to his audience by making it fun and interesting for the readers. Fromm deploys rhetorical questions like “Sound Crazy? It’s not.” (Fromm, 2015) which suggests that he is trying to make the passage more reader friendly whereby it attracts the readers’ attention. In comparison, Asher uses a generally serious tone to bring across her ideas. Also, she uses a more informative approach whereby her main aim was to inform the readers on her opinions on how Millennials want at their workplace. Both Fromm and Asher both identify their audience as the employers, however, the credibility of their suggestions on how to treat the millennial workers varies whereby Fromm incorporated statistics and studies to back up his suggestions as compared to Asher whereby she only included her personal