Mind Brain And Programs By John Searle Analysis

866 Words4 Pages

Computers Can Not Be Considered People In his essay, “Minds, Brains, and Programs,” John Searle discusses the Chinese room experiment and the concept of whether computers can be considered people or not. In my paper, I will be discussing Searle’s ideas and defending his argument that computers lack the qualities necessary to be considered people. I will also be defending Searle’s claim against the objections raised by William Lycan, who believes that computers can be considered people as they possess some of the qualities of a conscious mind. Searle begins the essay by discussing the difference between strong and weak AI. Weak AI is the principal value of the computer in the study of the mind is that it gives us a powerful tool (Searle …show more content…

The first sheet has just symbols, and the second sheet has symbols but the person is also given a sheet of instructions in English. The person then uses these instructions to decode the symbols. Even though this person does not speak Chinese, they can use these instructions to correlate one set of symbols to another to give a response. After a while, the person gets so good at following the instructions and the programmers get so good at writing the programs that from an external point of view the answers are indistinguishable from those of native Chinese speakers (Searle …show more content…

Searle talks about putting information into computers, “if you type in 2 plus 2 equals” the computer will respond “4”. (Searle 356). However, the computer lacks understanding of what four means or that it means anything at all. This lack of understanding could be interpreted as a lack of consciousness. He then brings up the point that computers have syntax but no semantics, this implies that computers can give programmed responses but have no understanding of those responses. This supports Searle’s idea that computers can not be classified as people due to a lack of