Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

One of the most important Supreme Court cases throughout history was that of Miranda vs. Arizona. The case was seen to prove that the confession of Ernesto Miranda in 1963 was inadmissible as evidence because Miranda was not informed of his rights. This case came at the same time as a national push for individual rights and civil liberties. The 1960’s were a decade predicated on increasing awareness of police misconduct and abuse of power. During this period, there was also a growing feeling that suspects were often treated unfairly by both law enforcement and the court system. The case came near the time of other social movements such as the civil rights movement, women’s rights movement, and the anti-war movement. The zeitgeist of the period

Arizona began with the interrogation of Ernesto Miranda in 1963. Miranda was taken into custody as a lead suspect in the kidnapping and rape of a woman in Phoenix, Arizona. Miranda was then questioned by the police for multiple hours eventually leading to him providing a written confession of the crimes. This confession was used against him in court, and he was eventually sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison despite him arguing that he was unaware of his legal right to remain silent of his right to an attorney. Following this conviction, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) decided to take up Miranda’s case and further argue that Miranda’s constitutional rights had been violated. The ACLU then filed a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that Miranda’s confession was collected in violation of his fifth and sixth amendment

Arizona are still seen today and still have a large impact on every police interrogation carried through the entire country. The enumerated pieces of case law implemented due to Miranda vs. Arizona has created much better protections for suspects in custody and holds the state to their high burden of proof in the fairest way possible. By protecting the rights of the people, the courts can guarantee the legitimacy of their trials. The impact that Miranda v. Arizona had on the United States legal system can be perceived in nearly every case carried out since. This also spawned a wave of rights for individuals. Suspects are informed of their varying rights at nearly all steps of the legal process. Examples include the right to a trial or the right to appeal in the case of a guilty