ipl-logo

Warren Court Era Research Paper

1039 Words5 Pages

The Warren Court Era was the name that described the Supreme Court of the United States from 1953 to 1969 when Chief Justice Earl Warren served. The Warren Court Era had many court cases that changed what history had originally started. Cases regarding civil rights and civil liberties were decided under Chief Justice Earl Warren and impacted the states and the people in many different ways.
On May 17, 1954 it was decided in a unanimous decision through the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas that there would be no more racial segregation in schools. The racial segregation that was currently taking place was found to be a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. In years before that, it was decided in …show more content…

This landmark case had a major impact on the beginning of the American civil rights movement. http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/brown-v-board-of-education-of-topeka. Brown v. Board of Education.

Another landmark case that was decided under Chief Justice Earl Warren was Miranda v. Arizona on June 13, 1966. This Supreme Court’s decision addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. The four cases were Miranda v. Arizona, Vignera v. New York, Westover v. United States, and California v. Stewart. The defendant in each of these cases were questioned by authorities and not given full and effective warning of their rights at the onset of the interrogation process. The defendants were held and not given the ability to leave at any time during the questioning and interrogation. In three of the …show more content…

Wainwright was decided on March 18, 1963. Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested in 1961 and charged with breaking and entering into a pool hall and stealing money from vending machines. At trial, he requested a lawyer to represent him as he could not afford one himself. He was informed by a Florida judge that the state only provided counsel and representation to indigent defendants who were charged with crimes that might result in the death penalty if found guilty. After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, he filed a habeas corpus petition to the Florida Supreme Court. He claimed that his conviction was unconstitutional because he lacked a defense attorney at trial. The Florida Supreme Court denied his petition and he followed with appealing his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Unites States Supreme Court ruled that his conviction was unconstitutional because he was denied an attorney at trial. In a unanimous decision the Court decided that the Sixth Amendment required states to provide attorney representation to any indigent criminal defendant charged with a felony. Before this case the Court only interpreted the Sixth Amendment as requiring the state to provide council in capital trials. After this case the Court ruled that the not only the federal government but also states are bound to the Sixth Amendment because the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause applies the key provisions of the Bill of Rights against the states. The Court

Show More
Related
1232 Words | 5 Pages

Having unconvinced the jury, Clarence was subsequently found guilty with five years of jail time (Facts par 3). Knowing 2 his constitutional entitlements were violated, Mr. Gideon compiled a series of petitions in an effort to gain his right to counsel (Facts par 4-5). As a result of his righteousness, the case of Gideon v. Wainwright was born. On June 3, 1961, a suspect broke into the Bay Harbor Poolroom and stole beer, wine, and money (David J Shestokas par 10-11).

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Gideon was arrested and charged with a crime on the basis of hearsay testimony from an alleged witness. When Gideon went to court for trial, he requested that he be granted counsel. The trial judge denied his request citing lack of legal authorization under Florida state law. Gideon subsequently represented himself at his trial, and was convicted by a jury. He was sentenced to five years in prison.

Read More
1659 Words | 7 Pages

On August 4, 1961 Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested for stealing money and drinks from a pool house in Florida. When he was arrested he was tried for his crimes. The 6th amendment states that if a defendant is too poor to provide a lawyer than he should be provided one by the Court, but Gideon was not given a lawyer. He was not given a lawyer because it says in the Florida law that lawyers are only provided in big felonies, not misdemeanors. So Gideon should have been provided a lawyer and was not.

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

Then Gideon tried to defend himself, but like many of us, he could not defend very well so was found guilty. He then was sentenced to imprisonment. Then Gideon applied to the state supreme court with a Writ of Habeas Corpus on the ground that the conviction violated his sixth amendment right. The Florida State Supreme Court then reviewed his case and agreed with the lower court. Gideon was not eligible to receive an attorney from the state.

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

Gideon was undoubtedly found guilty of the crime and was sent to prison. While he sat in a Florida prison, Gideon felt that his constitutional right to have an attorney was not granted. Thus, Gideon formulated an appeal to the Supreme Court handwritten on prison paper. The Supreme Court accepted his documents and decided to hear his case. Prior to Gideon vs Wainwright, Betts vs Brady was the case doctrine that was followed.

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

Gideon v. Wainwright was a 1963 landmark case in the United States Supreme Court. The court case involved the right to counsel under the Fifth and Sixth Amendment that eventually lead to a fundamental right. The Supreme Court eventually ruled that states are required under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to provide an attorney to defendants in criminal cases who are unable to afford their own attorneys. On June 3,1963 in Panama City, Florida a man known by Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested and charged with breaking and entering a poolroom in Florida with the intent to commit a misdemeanor offense therefore, he was charged with a felony. Clarence Earl Gideon was a poor man from Florida who ran away from home at a early age and was also under educated and had dyslexic throughout his life.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

Gideon V. Wainwright The case starts with the arrest of Clarence Earl Gideon who was charged with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Gideon was a runaway, having left home around eighth grade he became a drifter. He wandered around from place to place and spent time in and out of prison of prison for many non-violent crimes. He eventually found some part time work at a pool club, the same club room he was accused of breaking into and robbing.

Read More
843 Words | 4 Pages

On January 15, 1963, Clarence Gideon showed up to court without an attorney and expected the court to appoint one for him because he didn’t have the money to afford one. The Florida Supreme Court refused. The Florida State laws state that they appoint criminals who cannot afford an attorney

Read More
137 Words | 1 Pages

Earl Warren was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court for most of the nineteen fifties and sixties. During the civil rights movement, we think of names such as Martin Luther King or Malcom X, but we forget about the judges that presided over the civil rights cases. Warren and his fellow justices were responsible for the Supreme Court victories that the civil rights movement had during this time. One of Warren’s earliest accomplishments, after just being appointed Chief Justice, was the ruling on Brown v. Board of Education where he was able to get a unanimous decision ruling that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. Chief Justice Earl Warren and the Justices of the Supreme Court should be remembered for expanding the boundaries

Read More
1719 Words | 7 Pages

The Gideon v. Wainwright case was a land mark case in the year 1963. This case was the topic of criminal defendants have a right to an attorney even if they cannot afford one. The case was about Clarence Earl Gideon was a man with an eighth-grade education who ran away from home when he was a young teen. He spent much of his early life as a drifter, spending time in and out of prisons for nonviolent crimes. Gideon was charged in Florida with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony under Florida law.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

During the early 1950s throughout the late 1960s the Warren Court era extensively influenced the perspective of American society and its constitutional laws. During this period the Warren Court also sought out to revolutionize perspectives on discrimination based on race and economic class, limitations of citizens within the United States, and expansion of rights due to criminal injustice. The approach of the Warren Court on these subjects stated above benefited the american society due to the outcomes of the Warren Court rulings in this era. Warren Court had an immense impact on US society for instance Brown V. Board of Education which the concluding ruling ended segregation in schools between minority groups and caucasians. This ruling had a tremendous affect on society as the minority groups in the United States felt as if they were on the brink of equality and closer to desegregation.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Between the time of 1953 and 1969 Chief Justice of the U.S. was Earl Warren and established something called the “Warren Court”. During this time of the “Warren Court” there was significant changes such as separation of Church and State and equal protection under law, and more rights for the accused. It made changes in major aspects of the United States with court cases like Engle and Brown v. Board of Education. The Supreme Court Plays an Important role in our Society.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

Warren land marked case of his tenure was Brown V. Board of Education of Topeka (“Earl Warren”, 2009). Warren also land marked was Gideon V. Wainwright (1963) (“Earl Warren”, 2009). He also made fairness in criminal proceedings also led to MappV. Ohio (1961) (“Earl Warren”, 2009). He was not for illegal seized evidence on the case Mirand V. Arizona (1966) (“Earl Warren”, 2009). He made controversial calls years later when he advocated for the internment of Japanese Americans in California during WWII (“Earl Warren Biography”, n.d.)..

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

Arizona, Were his rights violated? It is obvious that Ernesto 's rights were not clear to him. Before his interrogation, Miranda was unaware of his rights and when he made his confession, they were entirely thrown out. In 1965, the court agreed to heir his case. Miranda 's case won 5-4 and a statement was made.

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

Wainwright illustrated the importance of personal rights guaranteed by the constitution. This case began when Clarence Gideon was denied a court appointed lawyer to represent him in a petty crime case. Gideon, unable to afford his own lawyer, was unable to adequately defend himself and consequently was convicted. However, he was undeterred. Gideon then wrote a letter to the Supreme Court to overturn this conviction with the 6th Amendment as his evidence of the court’s misconduct.

Read More

More about Warren Court Era Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document