Moral Impact Of Imperialism On Puerto Rico, Guam, Cuba, And Nicaragua

Imperialism is a political and economic system in which one country extends its power and influence over other countries or territories. This often involves the use of military force, colonization, and the exploitation of natural resources and labor.
As a Utilitarian moral anti-realist, I believe that moral values and obligations are not grounded in any objective moral reality, but rather in the subjective preferences of individuals and societies. Therefore, I approach the examination of the moral impact of imperialism on Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines, Cuba, China, and Nicaragua from a consequentialist perspective, evaluating the outcomes of these events based on their net effects on the well-being of the affected individuals and communities.

The US intervention supported the oppressive regime of Anastasio Somoza, which perpetuated political violence, human rights abuses, and economic inequality. This undermined the autonomy and well-being of the Nicaraguan people and contributed to a legacy of political instability and conflict in the country. From a Utilitarian perspective, the moral impact of US imperialism on Nicaragua was overwhelmingly negative, as it perpetuated a regime of oppression and violence that harmed the well-being of the Nicaraguan

It may also help to spread political and social values that could promote greater human rights and democracy. On the other hand, imperialism often involves the imposition of foreign rule, exploitation of resources and labor, and the suppression of local autonomy and sovereignty, which could result in significant harm and suffering for affected populations.
Overall, from a Utilitarian perspective, imperialism is likely to be seen as morally bad or at least highly questionable, due to its potential to cause significant harm and suffering for those affected. However, the moral evaluation of imperialism depends on the specific context and outcomes of each case, and there may be some situations where imperialism could be morally justifiable or even beneficial in the long run, if it does not cause undue harm to affected individuals and communities.
Regarding World War I, the US initially abstained from the conflict, as President Woodrow Wilson sought to maintain a position of neutrality and avoid entanglement in European conflicts. However, the US eventually entered the war after the sinking of the Lusitania, a British passenger ship, by a German U-boat, which resulted in the deaths of over 1,000 civilians, including 128