ipl-logo

Mr Simpson Flu Shot Case Study

1199 Words5 Pages

In the Mr. Simpson flu shot case it all comes down to if it’s the right answer to get the shot from the doctors. Sometimes we may think that it’s the right answer to do something while it could affect us later by being the wrong choice to make. Mr. Simpson has weak lungs and if he gets the flu then it could potentially kill him. At the same time, if he does get the flu shot it’s a 50/50 chance that it may not protect him from the flu. Mr. Simpson family and doctors think it’s the best to get the flu shot because it could save his life. Mr. Simpson does not want the flu shot no matter what the consequences or actions that may be done onto him, in other words, he rather die than get the flu shot. Mr. Simpson is not technically making the right long-term decision; he can take care of …show more content…

If anyone disobeys his decisions then it would be a result of being unethical. Every intent of bioethics is the right to live one’s life the way they see fit, forcing Mr. Simpson to get the flu shot would not be right and lying to him about a placebo drug would not be right neither. Both of those options would be the wrong way to handle the situation. We could handle it in an autonomy way meaning that anyone have the right to make decisions without being interfered with their decisions. Everyone have their own right to make informed decisions, for example, their health. With that being said Mr. Simpson is not a child and he has lived a long life. His lung problems face him with a short end to his life so if he does not want to live the rest of his life then we cannot force him. He knows if he takes the shots that there will be risk because of his lung problem. The flu shot could end his life instantly, and he feels that the shot is no better than not taking it at all. To him the chances of him dying will happen if he wants it to or

Show More
Related
604 Words | 3 Pages

In the book “The Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks,” Rebecca Skloot identifies a part of the book that talks about a patient’s consent to certain treatments at the Hospital. She specifically talks about how Henrietta was given an informed consent form, which she signed before she was given treatment; However, health consent forms could be argued back and forth in relation to how they worked back then, because with or without them Doctors still experimented on patients without their consents compared to these enlightened days where patients are in complete control of knowing what the doctor does with their bodies. Like Deborah said and if you want to go into history don’t go into it with a premeditated judgment like hate, one just has to understand that it wasn’t the fault of the people but the naivety of those times. A true case of patients where patients were left in the dark about a treatment was the Tuskegee Syphilis experiment where patients were just given a vague explanation to what they were

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

Requiring vaccinations is a highly debatable topic in the United States today. An article by Ronald Bayer, “The continuing tensions between individual rights and public health,” is one of the most reliable sources in the case study. The author has a PhD from the University of Chicago and focuses his research on issues of social justice and ethical matters. Bayer has also previously been a consultant to the World Health Organization on ethical issues related to public health. This makes him very knowledgeable about the topic and a highly credible source.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

By emphasizing the negative consequences of not getting vaccinated, the CDC aims to persuade viewers to prioritize their health and get immunized against the flu. Additionally, the campaign incorporates clear and concise calls to action, directing viewers on where to get vaccinated and providing resources for more

Read More
1286 Words | 6 Pages

In Mr. Simpson case doctor should listen to him not his family since he have every right to decide anything he want according to ethics. Mr. Simpson know what is good or bad for him, since he have full life of experience, and he believe flu by itself is not going to kill him. We can look this case from different ethical perspectives which are autonomy, paternalism, informed consent, and competence. And then I want present and respond counter argument. First, Mr. Simpson have right to not take the flu shot because, he have the right autonomy, which give him capacity of self-determination do whatever he choose.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

On the other hand, Bihr gains an audience related advantage of safety values when she addresses the topic of protecting children from harm; Bihr explains that administering vaccines helps protect children from illnesses like the influenza virus or rotavirus. Researchers Ferdinands et al. (2014) found that the “…influenza vaccination was associated with about a three-quarters reduction in risk of influenza-related critical illness in children… Our results highlight the value of increasing the use of influenza vaccines among children” (Ferdinands et al., 2014, p. 681); while Dr. Cave’s (2014) piece, Adolescent refusal of MMR inoculation: F (mother) v F (father), adds that “A global vaccination campaign has led to a 71 per cent drop in measles-related deaths between 2000 and 2011, making a huge impact on the death rate which was estimated at 2.6 million deaths per year in the 1980s” (Cave, 2014, p. 631).

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

A student from the Michigan University (2007) defines Bioethics as an activity which is a shared, reflective examination of ethical issues in health care, health science, and health policy. These fields have always had ethical standards, of course, handed down within each profession, and often without question. Hence, the discussion of this standards is called Bioethics. This discussions takes place in the media, in the academy, in classrooms, in labs, offices, and hospital wards. The conversation is often sparked by new developments, like the possibility of cloning.

Read More
1051 Words | 5 Pages

The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America endorses a policy that required annual influenza vaccinations to be a condition of ongoing employment (Slaunwhite, 2016). When most health care workers think about getting the influenza vaccination, they think about the time, cost, inconvenience, pain, and suffering (Cortes-Penfield, 2014). Health care workers think that the health care institution should bear the financial burden of mandatory vaccination for their workers, but evidence suggests that such an investment can reduce days lost to medical leave during influenza season and is probably cost-neutral or cost-effective (Cortes-Penfield, 2014). Health care workers are being fired for refusing to get flu shots which is causing nurse unions to file guidance so that their employees will not have an allergic reaction to the influenza vaccine or any of its components, or severe adverse reaction and end up suing (Evan, 2018). Provision 3.5 promotes the patient’s health and safety, which pertains to this because the healthcare worker questions his or herself about getting a flu shot and having a severe breakout which is promoting their health and safety.

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Conflict between individual good and the common good is at the core of this issue; hence it is really important to note that California seems to set the trends that the rest of the country has a tendency to follow. Of course the common good is always defined by the State, or the group of usually power hungry people who have gained control of the helm of Government. The United States has a responsibility of preventing illnesses and death, but not at the cost of our freedom to choose what is best for our family and individual needs. Of course the individual’s decision should be a well informed and educated one not a choice the state should make for us, but to help guide us in the right direction to make a confident choice. Vaccinations are felt to be one our healthiest actions.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

[Transition: With help from Mayo Clinic website, I learned that...] B. There Are Two Ways to Get The Vaccine 1. Shot (Injection) a. Contains an inactivated vaccine made up of killed flu virus. b. Available to people 6 months old and older. 2.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

Since our founding, our country has struggled to find a compromise between security and liberty. A balance between the two is exceedingly difficult because we are a fickle species and we change our minds on which we want more. A current controversy that has spiked national security interest is the topic of vaccinations. The United States is on the edge of a public health crisis. For many years, all 50 states have required that parents vaccinate their children against various diseases, including polio and measles, before enrolling them in public schools, and exempted parents who claimed to have religious or philosophical reasons (Ciolli).

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Vaccinations are an important part of healthcare in Frisco, TX. No matter what you’ve heard in the news lately about the “danger” of common vaccines, especially for children, they save lives. At this time of year, vaccinations against the flu are critical for the very young, the very old and those people who have compromised immune systems. Why You Should Get A Flu Shot Influenza is no joke; it’s a serious disease that can lead to hospitalization and even death.

Read More
1062 Words | 5 Pages

Vaccination is a key factor in keeping communities safe from harmful diseases, especially those that can spread easily. However, pediatric immunization policy can be debated from an ethical perspective because it concerns the role of the government and families in maintaining the health of children. I will argue that the immunization requirements with exemptions for school entrance in Washington state are ethically required because they balance the role of the government in public health and personal autonomy in the most minimally intrusive way possible. Hendrix points out that pediatric vaccination, or the policies surrounding vaccination requirements for children, can “span several public health domains, including those of policymakers,

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

Your sick child takes a drink without you looking, you take a drink after him not knowing that he is carrying the flu virus. You get up in the middle of the night, feeling sick to your stomach, running a fever, and feeling queasy. You think back to the last time you have shared or gotten close to anyone sick, you remember that your child is sick and think back to the last time you or him got a flu vaccine, or any vaccine. Vaccines help protect us from sickness and build up antigens to fight the virus off. Children should get vaccines for the protection of others.

Read More
1557 Words | 7 Pages

Less than 1 in a hundred thousand child will suffer from serious adverse effects of vaccination, which is several times higher than the risk of being struck by lightning. The number of reported events of adverse reaction are very low, thus the concerns of vaccine causing irreparable damage is almost unfounded. Besides that, the risk of getting infected by a vaccine-preventable disease is higher than the risk of being saddled with adverse reactions from the vaccine itself. For example, CDC claims that more than 260,000 individuals are hospitalized due influenza annually, with deaths ranging from 3,000 to 46,000 individuals. Besides that, 800,000 to 1.4 million people suffer from chronic hepatitis B, with complications such as liver cancer.

Read More
1821 Words | 8 Pages

For example, some parents are reluctant to vaccinate their children against diseases like Hemophilic Influenza if they won’t be attending daycare. While daycares require this vaccine, this deadly disease is a threat to all children, even if they do not attend daycare (Bronfin 3). People who oppose mandatory vaccinations for public school children point out parents concerned with their children being around unvaccinated children could move their child to a private institution requiring immunization (Murphy 2). This reasoning would only add extra stress for families trying to find schools for their children and could cost parents more money than just being able to send their child to a free public school without fear. The next most controversial concern parents have regards the ingredients in some vaccinations.

Read More

More about Mr Simpson Flu Shot Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document