Core Values and Ethical Principles The six core values recognized by the NASW Code of Ethics are: service, social justice, dignity and worth of person, importance of human relationships, integrity, and competence (NASW, 2008). These values are defined and expanded upon, and are then listed as ethical principles. Several of these principles apply to this case. The service value’s main goal is to help people in need and address social issues. In this case spousal abuse is the social issue, and Marietta is certainly a person in need. These fall under the service compartment of values. In the area of Social Justice, Marietta’s heritage and financial class can lead to discrimination. Every effort should be made to make all information, services, …show more content…
This value places much emphasis on the client making their own decisions. This application is extremely relevant in this case and must be weighed against other consequences. Marietta’s desire to return home rather than stay at the shelter creates the dilemma of honoring her wishes even when it may be detrimental to her. She also needs to be made aware of the opportunity that the shelter is offering to improve her situation. Ultimately Marietta must determine the direction to take. The Importance of the Human Relationships core value is crucial in this case. Creating understanding and trust with Marietta can only be achieved with a strong relationship. This may be difficult with the language barrier. The well-being of Marietta is in jeopardy and requires intervention. The way she views her situation is with despair and hopelessness. Good communication, and a strong relationship with her could drastically enhance her view of …show more content…
Encouragement and support are useful when addressing her depression and low self-esteem. Teaching her ways that she can improve and help herself, should be rewarding and satisfying for Marietta. The more involved she can be in her own story, the better. The chances of social justice issues getting involved in this case are strong. If the organization elects to deny help to clients who will not leave abusive situations, conflicts will occur. A difficult decision must be made concerning whether to carry out the shelters orders, or your personal view of the ethical limits set by the NASW Code of Ethics (NASW, 2008). For a decision of this importance it is best to seek consultation before moving forward. As with all cases, the Garcia case engulfs the broader picture, and many policy changes could be implemented. It is the job of social workers to challenge these policies on a continuous basis. Every possible action should be taken to improve policy whenever applicable. Responsibilities of social workers to the broader society are covered in section six. 6.04 Social and Political Action are most relevant with this case. Section (b) explains that special attention should be given to people that are vulnerable, disadvantaged, oppressed or exploited.