ipl-logo

National Labor Relations Board Vs Electromation Case Studies

1247 Words5 Pages

Case Study Analysis
Name
Institution

Case Study Analysis
Introduction
An employer-employee relation is influenced by different factors that revolve the operational scope of the organization. In the contemporary working environment, employers are obliged to meet specific regulations, such as The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRA forbids employers from meddling with, restricting, or coercing employees in the exercise of rights relating to organizing, forming, joining or assisting a labor organization for collective bargaining purposes, or from working together to improve terms and conditions of employment, or refraining from any such activity. The participative decision-making process has been prominence in the …show more content…

Electromation Inc. for violation of Section 8(a)(2) and (1) of the NLRA act through, its establishment and administration of "action committees" consisting of employees and management.
It is imperative to ensure that employees are part of a labor organization mandated to ensure their wellbeing is maintained and progressively improved. Electromation Inc. violated labor rules by failing to allow their workers to register to unions but instead extended the favor of instigating committees to improve the welfare of their staff. This is the central issue and it has dominated the facts of the case. Because Electromation Inc. employees lack the right to a representative and to form, join or assist in the development of a self-organization and aid in the bargaining process.
Therefore, it is vital for organizations to incorporate workers organization representatives during initiation of decisions connected to employee welfare. The agents act as the voice of the workers and ensure that agreements are set based on the stipulated requirements. Additionally, they serve as guards of ensuring that the stated proposals are implemented according to the initial

Open Document