National School Lunch Program Essay

National School Lunch Program Indiana ranks 9th in adult obesity (Duffy, 2014). 1/3 of children are overweight or obese (Editorial Board, 2014). We need to change obesity rates starting at a young age. At schools. Rules and regulations are overpowering the ways students now think about food. With rules, students think that whole grain products or vegetables are “gross”. It is time for a change. Adams Central should pull out of the National School Lunch Program. The problem with the National School Lunch Program is regulations and rules are hard for schools when finding foods that meet the guidelines. Some guidelines and regulations require that any item considered a grain offered for lunch, such as bread, cookies, or food made with flour, have to be at least 51% whole wheat or whole grain. Regulations set in 2012 said only half of grain foods needed to be 51% whole grain (Duffy, 2014). The government sends mixed statements by saying the 2012 regulations

The U.S. government spend over 10 billion dollars a year on the National School Lunch Program (Editorial Board, 2014). 100,000 schools nationwide participate in the subsidized-lunch program (Wolfgang, 2014)). The government is allowing “healthy” foods and students are buying them. However, just because students are choosing veggies and fruits, it doesn’t mean they are eating them. It is estimated that extra fruits and veggies costs the U.S. $5.4 mill. each day and $3.8 mill. of it are being discarded in the trash each day (Duffy, 2014). According to (Duffy, 2014) schools are disliking new school lunch programs. Secondly, Fort Wayne Community Schools is finding it hard to find good foods and schools are loosing money during lunch. Some are worked up about healthy thrown away food (Editorial Board, 2014). So, schools should pull out of the National School Lunch Program to avoid wasting