Nature Vs Nurture Argument

The nature versus nurture argument is one of the oldest philosophical questions within psychology. Nature states that the genes and genetic factors impact who we are from our bodily appearance to our personality characteristics. Nurture states the environmental variables that influence who we are, including our early childhood practices, how we are raised, our social upbringing, and our immediate culture. Different divisions of psychology often take a one side versus the other. Biological psychologist tend to believe the importance of genetics and biological influences. Behaviorist tend to focus more on the influence that the environment has on behavior. There has been debates over the contributions of nature versus nurture frequently taking a narrow-minded approach. With

When a genetic variant indicates the opportunity to develop a mental illness, this is used to indicate nurturing. This information can be used as the behavior in such a way that the condition may not develop or may develop with less severity. Another example is the basis for addiction. Some researchers believe is not thought to be entirely genetic. Perhaps it could be more environmental, such as the habits of parents. This might also be a substantial factor that can contribute to the development of an addiction. It is believed that far more significant to a genetic predisposition to alcohol addiction may be the exposure to an addict routinely abusing alcohol. Perhaps viewing this behavior as normal would be more influential in making a child think that it is the norm. However, in contrast to this some studies show that alcohol addiction, can recur in families and that certain genes may have an influence over the way alcohol tastes and the way it affects the body. (Nature vs. Nurture. (2015, August