Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debate between nurture and nature
Nature vs. nurture debate
Nature versus nurture debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debate between nurture and nature
Nature vs. nurture debate
Nature versus nurture debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Nature vs. nurture is complex theory and has been analyzed through the ages and both play critical roles in determining who and what people become as they
How do we become who we are today? Are we born this way, or are we slowly transformed by the world around us? This controversy is most often recognized as the nature verses nurture conflict. Some people believe that it is strictly genes that affects our ways of life, others believe that it is the environment that affects us. Though genetics makes us who we are genetically, the environment in which we are raised directly shapes our life.
It is disputed whether nurture or nature is more dominant in forging a person’s identity. Whether a person is happy or sad, kind or cruel, smart or unintelligent is based on their genetics or the environment around them. Of course, both factor into the equation, but one does more so than the other: while people can have genetic differences, the way that they are raised is far more influential on their personalities. Firstly, the book “Lord of the Flies” has many instances where it is clear that outside factors are more prominent than inside ones when it comes to one 's temperament.
The expression “nature vs. nurture” describes the question of how a person's characteristics are formed. Nurture shapes individuals personalities, although nature is who we truly are. Nature is shown when humans feel threatened or scared. Fear drives humans to lengths they usually would not go to, all because of a natural instinct to survive. From “The Biology of fear and anxiety related behaviors'', “Fear results in the expression of a range of defensive behaviors which are aimed at escaping from the source of danger or conflict.”
ny significant instances and events in one’s lifetime that shape their personality and character. As many people know, significant events during childhood can dramatically affect people’s life and surrounding environments later in life. According to NPR, studies show that, “…our early experiences likely affect us to a certain extent. And we know that due to variations in psychological makeup, some people are more sensitive to environmental factors than others” (NPR). This quote introduces the nurture vs. nature theory which shows how both the environment and genes contribute to the outcome of people’s future.
Nature versus Nurture is an age old debate in Psychology. Nature vs Nurture relates to an individuals behaviour and characteristics and whether they are inherited through their DNA and genes, which can be seen as an innate approach to the debate. This is because innatism believes that the mind is born with all knowledge. Nurture states our behaviour and characteristics are learned through our environment and experiences, This therefore can be seen as empiricist approach as empiricism states that we are born a blank slate and everything we know is learned through our senses. Reproductive behaviour looks at how patterns are established and formed to continue the survival of humanity.
Nature is the predetermined traits that people are born with, while nurture is the influence that affects people after they’re born. The debate surrounding Nature V. Nurture is how much of a person’s traits is predetermined and how much is influenced by the environment. Mary Shelley's believes in nurture more than nature. Victor Frankenstein has certain traits that he’s born with. Frankenstein is born into a prestigious, wealthy family.
Studies conducted on twins helps us understand the controversy between nature vs. nurture as identical twins share 100% of their DNA and fraternal twins share roughly 50% (same as all siblings). Furthermore, being raised in the same environment can give an accurate gauge of nurture. One ideal case study would be separating twins at birth, then seeing how they develop. Although, the only study I could find on that started in the 1960’s, it was found unethical and the results have been sealed until 2066.
In the nature vs. Nurture argument, we are trying to determine if Nature or Nurture has a bigger role of the development of a child. In my opinion, I think that nature has the bigger role in the development in a child. I believe that it 's in your gene whe you are conceived. In an experiment, two twins were split up at birth and then were joined at the age of 30. When you look at the personality trait of the twins raised in different home were very much alike.
Nature is when it is genetic and biological influences, Nurture is when it is social, economic and environmental influences. Underneath are five different opinions from 5 different people on the nature nurture debate and which side they agree with. Both theories have a point. I say this because some people are born to be the way they are but at the same time this could be changed by many aspects of a person’s life.
The nature vs. nurture debate centers on whether human behaviour and personality are inherited (nature) or acquired (nurture); in other words, whether a person’s environment or a person’s genetic inheritance determines their behaviour and personality. Goldsmith and Harman (1994) adopt a neutral position, in which both nature and nurture influence people, stating that they “believe that the fundamental issue concerns the interplay between characteristics of the individual and of the relationship” (54). Goldsmith and Harman discuss temperament and attachment for infant, with temperament being linked to the nature side of the debate and attachment being linked with the nurture side; as a result, the infant’s temperament influences the attachment bond between the infant and the mother, but the attachment bond influences the temperament of the child as well. Therefore, both nature and nurture interact with each other to produce people’s behaviour (Harman et al. 54). Andersen and Berk (1998) take on the nurture perspective, while Leary (1999) claims that nature is the determining factor of a person’s personality.
Nurture can change how you act, and the way you look at things. Nurture has a bigger role in personality than nature. I still have to consider that they both have a role in personality. Many identical twins are different. Personality can change from when you were born.
They believe this because nature is responsible for the growth of a person from the fetus level until development into a normal adult. Also, the genetic makeup decides your sex, skin color, color of the eye and hair as well as other features which are inherited. However, nurture will change some of the nature of people, maybe not physically, but mentally. It can change people’s inherited features if the environment around is different. A typical example that proves nurture is more important than nature is about a boy who lived during the Ming dynasty of China.
While nurture is most commonly defined as environment and experiences that we have. Although, nature and nurture plays a big role in child development, nurture seems to be a little bit more of an influence on child development than nature. I believe that children learn by experiences that they have. On one side (nature) of this debate; it says that intrinsic influence such as genetics plays a major
NATURE VERSUS NURTURE Nature: Nature is also known as heredity, it is the genetic code you are born with. It is inherited i-e passed on to you from your parents.