According to the author, Suzanne Britt, I am considered both a sloppy and neat person. Sloppy people seem to be very sentimental. They would be known, “making family scrapbooks into which they will put newspaper clippings, postcards, locks of hair, and dried corsage from their senior prom”. This quote connects to one part of me because I am very sentimental with pictures, and old objects indicating accomplishment within schools and sports. Another example, of me being sloppy is especially in school.
When everyone gets first place, does anyone truly win? “A’s for Everyone!” by Alicia Shepard is a persuasive essay discussing how grade inflation affects professors at a collegiate level. Shepard’s credentials are satisfactory: she is a journalism professor who’s experienced demanding students first-hand. These students believe they are entitled to receive A grades, regardless of their exam scores.
Hannah Gardner uses propaganda to try and make people eat more potatoes. She talks about a lab experimenting in producing potatoes in a more efficient and faster way. The lab claims that this way will produce potatoes faster than ever. Hannah states people eat to much noodles and rice and she is trying to draw them away from that and eat more potatoes. She states that potatoes require 30 percent less water than rice, wheat, and corn and that this will help our water shortages from worsening.
The Glass Castle In The Glass Castle, by Jeanette Walls, it presents welfare to utilize the idea of overcoming adversity and achieving success despite difficult circumstances. In the beginning of the book, Walls connects her personal experience as a kid to the symbol of welfare in order to emphasize how it was proclaimed through her childhood and adulthood. Take, for example, that In the passage, Jeanette explains, “But for the time being, things might get a little tight around the house.
The bi-partisan government in the United States of America is further divided by the ways of the internet. The internet only makes it more readily available to find false information to prove your side of the arguement right. In the article titled “The Things People Say: Rumors in an age of unreason,” published in The New Yorker (November 2009), staff writer Elizabeth Kolbert discusses The spread of rumors across the internet and how it further divides the bipartisan government and argues that due to the filtering of ideas people are more likely to go against evidence when there are people that support their opinions. The author supports this claim by providing examples such as the study done in 1970, quoting multiple sources beyond her political
Introduction: Are all neat people lazy, wasteful, insensitive, and less moral than sloppy people? Are all men more interested in sports than women, while all women focus their time on housework and cleaning? The answer to both of these questions is no. These questions bring up generalizations that are dealt with in both of the short essays which are as follows: “Neat People vs. Sloppy People” by Suzanne Britt and “Batting Clean-up and Striking Out” by Dave Barry. Suzanne Britt describes the generalized behavior and mindset of neat and sloppy people, which is not a popular stereotype heard in everyday life.
In her essay entitled “Garbage” from The Norton Sampler journalist Katie Kelley states that the cause of New York’s garbage problem results from the nonchalant attitude of its citizens. New Yorkers have a nonchalant attitude toward moral behavior. Kate Kelly stresses that New York in general has as a distorted view of life’s problems. Kelley writes “New Yorkers are a provincial lot. They wear their city’s accomplishment like blue ribbons.
In the article, “Is Faster Always Better”, author Katherine Mangan explains the advantages, disadvantages, and even questions dual credit. Dual credit being a student earning of college credit while still in high school. Katherine uses a former student, James Hinkson, as an example to dismiss the idea of pursuing dual credit, to question the worth of the system after looking at Hicksons unsuccessful outcome, and to explain why it's not the best option for students. The motive of dual credit is to save students money, time, and chance a degree faster. According to Mangan, although dual credit has its advantages, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
Summary “Children Need to Play, Not Compete,” by Jessica Statsky is a thoughtful insight on the competitive sports for children. She is of the view that the competitive sports can ruin the enjoyment that games are supposed to provide. These methods of playing the games like adults can prove to be lethal for physical and psychological health. The author quotes from an authentic source that “Kids under the age of fourteen are not by nature physical.” (Tutko)
Carpe Diem and It's Presence in Literature Carpe Diem, translated as “seize the day”, is a Latin aphorism that depicts what one should do with their life. To seize the day means to live your days to the fullest and this concept is shown brilliantly in many forms of literature. The podcast, “This American Life: ‘A Better Mousetrap’” by Ira Glass, and the article, “IT’S OK TO BE DIFFERENT” by Angela Erickson, share this theme that once given life, he or she should attempt to enjoy it to the greatest extent. There are many examples from the podcast “This American Life: ‘A Better Mousetrap’” that support the message of Carpe Diem. It is neatly woven into the podcast’s story when a mother, Kristy, shares how she raises her disabled child, Tim,
Writer Alexandra Robbins writes a non-fiction expose following the lives of various overachievers at Walt Whitman High School. The purpose Robbins conveys in the book is that college admission expectations have made high school a very cut-throat environment, leading students who try to meet these expectations to have deteriorating emotional and mental health. Throughout the book Robbins uses strong forms of imagery to get across the idea that stress is negatively impacting many students health and uses shocking statistics to show that students are turning to self –harm and suicide to deal with stress. Robbins uses imagery in a scene of a Whitman student named AP Frank who acquired seventeen AP credits in the course of his high school career.
I had an ah!ha! moment when reading the introduction to How Children Succeed by Paul Tough. There was a lot of information in regards to the GED program and how it began. The purpose of the program made sense; however, I always wondered why those students who passed the test are less likely to go to college. The reasoning according to Heckman is, that they lacked important traits learned in high school for instance, “…an inclination to persist at a boring and often unrewarding task: the ability to delay gratification; tendency to follow through on a plan—also turned out to be valuable in college, in the workplace, an in life generally” (2012, pg. xix). Therefore, getting out of school sooner does not seem to work well because students are less likely to stick to the long years college may bring.
Her distinction between neat and sloppy people and central focus of her essay is that “neat people are lazier and meaner than sloppy people” (Britt 214). Every argument Britt introduces to her readers can be drawn back to this one statement. A sloppy person to Britt is one that “gives loving attention to every detail” (Britt 215) of every belonging, not one that spends every inch of his or her time simply throwing the belongings away. This demonstration of each individual’s action depicts a mean neat person and a caring sloppy person, as she previously argued. The underline argument is evident throughout the
When he says: “She is in there looking … Everywhere!” (Barry 249), it makes many people relate to the situation, both men and women; plus, there is no pretentiousness in the way the author tells his story. Conversely, Britt looks more serious, almost harsh in her claims. Indeed, she states: “Neat people are lazier and meaner than sloppy people” (Britt 242). By saying that, there are chances that someone could get offended and does not find it funny; especially if a neat person is reading it.
World War II caused the death of many people. The wrath of the Germans, Italians, and the Japanese led to horrible death. The concentration camps killed thousands of people. The Japanese concentration camps, in particular, were awful places that forced hard labor out of prisoners of war until they died. During World War II, the Japanese lost to the Allies and surrendered, but the concentration camps of the Japanese still caused the death of many prisoners of war.
