ipl-logo

Negative Effects Of Hammurabi's Laws

407 Words2 Pages

Hammurabi’s code was written to protect the people of the ancient city of Babylon. However, I think otherwise. Nearly 4,00 years ago, in Babylon, Hammurabi created a set of 282 laws to protect the people that he ruled. On the other hand, I believe that his laws weren’t just to everyone.
To begin with, Hammurabi’s Laws harmed families a lot. For example, Law 129, women are tied up and thrown into water if caught cheating on their husband. This punishment doesn’t apply to men. Also, if a man strikes his father, his hands are then cut off which, in my opinion, is too extreme of a punishment. Based on what I read, I don’t think that it is just to apply a consequence to one group of people, and not the other. This just goes to show Hammurabi …show more content…

For instance, in Law 21, the “victim” could have lied to make it seem that the “robber” wasn’t caught only to get money. This makes it unfair towards the government. Also, in Law 53 and 54, the man who opened his trench had nothing to with it on purpose ye he has to restore the crops he destroyed. Furthermore, these punishments weren’t necessary. This is important because if they hadn’t done anything on purpose they shouldn’t have to receive the punishment. It is evident that the punishments weren’t fair to the innocent.
Additionally, Hammurabi’s code didn’t fully repair personal injury. For example, in Law 199, if someone hurts a slave they have to pay half of the value of the slave. However, if you hurt a free man you get a bigger punishment. In addition, if a man strikes the daughter of a free man, he shall pay ten shekels of silver. But, if a man strikes a slave girl, he only pays two shekels of silver. In my opinion, these laws should have the same consequences to the different people. Overall, Hammurabi’s Code didn’t have the right consequences.
In conclusion, Hammurabi’s Code was not just and had different punishments towards the same crimes. Also, his punishments were way too severe. Hammurabi was not a just ruler of Babylon. Many different people have opinions over this issue. How do you think Hammurabi’s Laws treated the people of

Show More
Related
657 Words | 3 Pages

For example, law 195 (Doc C), if a son strikes his father, his hands will be cut off. This is not fair to the child because they would then have no self defence. In our society, this law

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

They are of complete fairness and help protect the security and welfare of the people. These laws concerning property, personal injury, and family would soon shape the way of the Mesopotamian culture. Hammurabi's code concerning family law for example was highly proficient. It brought order and civilian rights regarding family affairs. For instance in Law 195, (Doc C), if a son is to hit his father he shall have his hands cut off.

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

Do you think cutting someone's hand off because they striked their father is fair? Hummurabi’s code was just because it helps protect the weak. If someone commits a crime it makes sure no one will do it by using harsh punishments. It also helps protect property and property equaled power. Hammurabi code was created in the empire of Babyloina in Mesopotamia.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

So, he decided to make Hammurabi’s code with 282 laws organized by specific themes. Although a set of laws was needed, the severity of punishments in property and family laws sure outweighed any of the good laws he made. Hammurabi’s code was not just because of his family law. In law 129 it states “if a married lady is caught in adultery with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water” (Doc C) and that isn’t just because That’s not fair

Read More
394 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi’s Code covered many issues, including trade, marriage, and divorce. I believe that Hammurabi’s code was fair and just. There many reasons why Hammurabi’s code was fair. For example, Property Law number 21 states: “If a man has broken through the wall [to rob] a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall which he has made.” This law is fair because if you broke through someone’s wall, they will have to spend lots of time and money to repair it.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

“Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found against the wrong. ”(Theodore Roosevelt) To start off let’s talk about Hammurabi, a king not many people knew about. Thanks to clay writing tablets found by archaeologist, we know some things about him.

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

Hammurabi’s code gives judgements and consequences for certain crimes. The punishment for a crime depended on one’s social rank. There were essentially three classes; the priests and noble landlords, the freemen, and slaves. Each law illustrated the division in the societies social status. As a particular law read; “If a man has destroyed the eye of another free man, his own eye shall be destroyed.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Hammurabi’s code was not just because the personal injury laws did not protect all people equally, property laws were harsh and not protecting people enough, and the Family laws should allow people to be with whoever they want to be with. Looking at the evidence from the Personal Injury Laws states that punishments towards slaves are

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

King Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because of the evidence found in the 282 laws. The codes that King Hammurabi wrote about were personal injury law, property law and family law. First, there is evidence that the codes were unjust. The first, code was personal injury law.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

Each type of code is meant to bring justice to all the parts of society so that there would be fairness to the accused, fairness to the victim and fairness for society. Some of Hammurabi’s codes were fair and others were not fair. The first law is Family Law and it states that If a son has struck his father, his hands shall

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

Thus this proves that Hammurabi 's law is important in keeping people and their possessions safe. Hammurabi 's laws were helpful and fair to the people. Laws like that helped the society become even stronger by keeping people who were done wrong out of the streets. Laws in our time and Hammurabi 's time were important and in the future laws will still help protect people and their property just like they did in Hammurabi

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

Some laws had harsh punishments and other laws you just had to pay for what you did. Hammurabi clearly showed the opposite of equal among the social classes, by favoring the rich and making it harder for the poor. With the different social classes,

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

These laws should both have the same consequences because all women should be treated equal. These laws on injury show that Hammurabi's code is very unjust. Hammurabi’s code may have been written to protect everyone, but the laws ended up being excessive and harmful. The laws about family, property, and injury are cruelly excessive and are unequal towards different classes.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Funk and Wagnall New World Encyclopedia wrote, “The basis of criminal law is that of equal retaliation, comparable to the Semitic law of ‘an eye for an eye’”(“Hammurabi, Code of” 1). Hammurabi was the first to make the law code meaning he was the first to start the foundation for our law system today. He was the father of law and today his justice code is still apparent today. The code of Hammurabi was designed to protect the weak, which includes: women, children and slaves. Funk and Wagnall wrote, “It seeks to protect the weak and the poor, including women, children, and slaves, against injustice at the hands of the rich and powerful”(Hammurabi, Code of” 1).

Read More

More about Negative Effects Of Hammurabi's Laws

Related Topics

Open Document