ipl-logo

What Is Hammurabi's Code Was It Just Dbq

713 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Hammurabi laws and modern laws

Hammurabi’s code: Was it Just?

You’ve just been convicted of assaulting your father and now you have a sentence, both of your hands cut off! Back in Hammurabi’s court, this would’ve been your harsh punishment. Hammurabi’s was ruling over one million people, and he needed to have order. So, he decided to make Hammurabi’s code with 282 laws organized by specific themes. Although a set of laws was needed, the severity of punishments in property and family laws sure outweighed any of the good laws he made. Hammurabi’s code was not just because of his family law. In law 129 it states “if a married lady is caught in adultery with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water” (Doc C) and that isn’t just because That’s not fair …show more content…

In law 48 (Doc D) , it states “If a man has borrowed money to plant his fields and a storm has flooded his field or carried the crop, … in that year he does not have to pay his creditor.” Although the storm or flood is a natural occurrence, the creditor doesn’t deserve to have a punishment for something that he didn’t cause. Also, in the property Law (Doc D) law 23 states “If the robber is not caught, the man who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has lost before a god, and the city and the mayor in whose territory or district the robbery has been committed shall replace for him whatever he has lost.” I think this is unfair to the community because they shouldn’t have to replace something someone else committed. Also, in the first place there should be now robbers because if Hammurabi is trying to (in Doc B) “ Let no destruction befall my monument,” why is there any robbers or robbery committed in the first place? Also, in (Doc D) 53, 54 i’t states “If a man has opened his trench for irrigation and the waters have flooded a neighbor’s field, the man must restore the crop he has caused to be lost.” That is not just because what if the man accidently did it? He doesn’t deserve such a huge punishment because not only would he have to pay, there is a high chance he could be sold into slavery. I think a better punishment would be they share the man’s yard until the others man’s yard is back to normal. Sounds like these laws were not stable enough to rule

Show More
Related
378 Words | 2 Pages

They were the first set of written laws. The purpose was to punish people for stealing ,murdering,and other things. Hammurabi’s codes were just because it is a punishment and they are fair to people. Hammurabi’s Code is just for two reasons family law and property law.

Read More
1441 Words | 6 Pages

He was able to conquer his opponents with the great army at which he had at his command. Hammurabi wanted to build a great empire that would last his life span and past it. In order to to this though he had to create a set of laws that would create order in his kingdom. The laws created a high set of standards for everyone and issued death to law breakers that committed the crime of false accusation murder and failure to abide the kingdome. This great code known as hammurabi's code would be used in many different civilizations that would come after the fall of

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

Hammurabi’s Code DBQ King Hammurabi’s rule began in the city of Babylon. He later then extended his control by taking over Larsa and Mari a large part of Mesopotamia. After expanding his land, Shamash, the god of justice presented him with a code of 232 laws (Doc A). These laws were then influenced throughout the community and were considered a part of the communities culture. I disagree with Hammurabi’s code because most laws were to cruel and targeted certain people.

Read More
394 Words | 2 Pages

The victim would also have to replace the items the robber stole. I think that this law is a threat to deter any burglars. Also, Family Law number 168 states: “If a man has married a wife and a disease has seized her, if he is determined to marry a second wife, he

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

I believe that Hammurabi’s code was just. I have all of the laws and documents that support my claim as to why I think the code was just. I think that Hammurabi’s code was just because obviously these things had to have happened at least once or they wouldn’t have laws about it. So society needs to learn even if it means having that harsh of a punishment. Having that harsh of a punishment actually helps because society sees that if they do that specific crime, they will get a really bad punishment so that prevents it from happening.

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi’s code was it just? Hammurabi code was just because of Family Law, Property Law, Personal Injury Law. family Law in Hammurabi’s code were just. If a married lady was caught in adultery with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water.” “If a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off” (Doc C).

Read More
403 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi’s code is just because of its family law. The family law makes it just because they make it fair for the family to move on after struggles. According to law 195 if a son has struck his own father he shall have his hands cut off so he can 't hit his father anymore. So I think it 's fair because he can 't hit his family members can 't hurt them any more so it 's keeping his family safe.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

This law seems, as well, too harsh. The son should get a punishment but getting your hands cut off for hitting his father would lead to son being scared. In conclusion, Hammurabi 's code is unjust. The evidence shows that the Personal Injury Laws didn’t protect all people equally, the Property Laws punishments were too harsh, and the Family Laws can cause someone 's death.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

King Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because of the evidence found in the 282 laws. The codes that King Hammurabi wrote about were personal injury law, property law and family law. First, there is evidence that the codes were unjust. The first, code was personal injury law.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

The Code of Hammurabi dates back to BCE - era when “with the belief that Hammurabi received the code from the Sun God Shamesh.” (Hall IV 104) His code was the ethics that the people where to fallow. It was to provide justice for those who where harmed and

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

Each type of code is meant to bring justice to all the parts of society so that there would be fairness to the accused, fairness to the victim and fairness for society. Some of Hammurabi’s codes were fair and others were not fair. The first law is Family Law and it states that If a son has struck his father, his hands shall

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

12/14/15 George Orwell 1984 Could you be controlled without knowing so? George Orwell’s dystopian fiction 1984 is a gripping warning about the dangers of totalitarian politics and compliance to such political systems. Through the trials of main character Winston Smith living in Orwell interpretation of the future, modern day London totalitarian superstate called Oceania, Orwell’s write his precautionary trial. I believe Orwell wrote this book to warn us about certain characteristics that we possessed as human beings that could lead us into such a dystopian world as the one presented in 1984. Power, total power given to such a political system is what drives this novel.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

These laws should both have the same consequences because all women should be treated equal. These laws on injury show that Hammurabi's code is very unjust. Hammurabi’s code may have been written to protect everyone, but the laws ended up being excessive and harmful. The laws about family, property, and injury are cruelly excessive and are unequal towards different classes.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Funk and Wagnall New World Encyclopedia wrote, “The basis of criminal law is that of equal retaliation, comparable to the Semitic law of ‘an eye for an eye’”(“Hammurabi, Code of” 1). Hammurabi was the first to make the law code meaning he was the first to start the foundation for our law system today. He was the father of law and today his justice code is still apparent today. The code of Hammurabi was designed to protect the weak, which includes: women, children and slaves. Funk and Wagnall wrote, “It seeks to protect the weak and the poor, including women, children, and slaves, against injustice at the hands of the rich and powerful”(Hammurabi, Code of” 1).

Read More

More about What Is Hammurabi's Code Was It Just Dbq

Related Topics

Open Document