When one thinks of Kansas, the thought of diversity hardly comes to mind; however, in their book Kansas Politics and Government: The Clash of Political Cultures Dr. H. Edward Flentje of Wichita State University and Dr. Joseph A. Aistrup of Kansas State University make the argument that cultural and political diversity have led to the numerous accounts of conflict throughout Kansas history and created the political factions that evident in the state today. Kansas Politics and Government: The Clash of Political Cultures is a great in depth summary of all things political in the state of Kansas. It not only covers the Constitution of Kansas as well as the structure and institutions of the government, but also takes a deep dive into the history
A twenty-first century Republican is “undoubtedly proud of the early party’s stand against slavery, but is likely to cringe at its support of protectionist tariffs rather than free trade.” (Eddins, 2012). Today most Republicans believe that government should tax people less, maintain a strong military, and intervene in people’s lives as little as possible. On the other hand Democrats support government programs that help those in need, as well as protection of public education, civil rights, and environmental issues. Although the Democratic-Republican party over powered the Federalists, we wouldn’t be where we are today without either of these political
The 1960s are remembered as times of extensive change along with substantial political unrest. From groups like the SDS to the weatherman and the Red Army faction, young people, particularly students across the globe were organizing, forming coalitions, and agitating against perceived injustice at the hands of government. At the same time, a new set of young americans were galvanizing their peers in favor of a more conservative agenda. Focusing in on anti-communist action and expansive government infringing upon state’s rights, these young conservatives found themselves creating political changes that would last decades. They were the beginning of the new right.
These principles can be seen throughout the writings of the political thinkers of the 1890’s and illuminate how this category of thought is familiar to the American life. Ignatius Donnelly, a social reformer who helped establish the Populist party in 1892, heavily criticised the oligarchical society that took advantage of the large, impoverished working class. To this ailment he offers the solution by stating that government should not be viewed “as a divine something which has fallen down upon us out of heaven, and therefore not to be improved upon or even criticised” instead, government is a “human device to secure human happiness, and in itself has no more sacredness than a wheelbarrow or a cooking pot” (790). Donnelly stresses that the
The conservative movement included the entitlement programs, civil rights policies, and decreasing the size of the government. The political party, Moral Majority, was a Christian rights and conservative party. It also included affirmative action, or providing special treatment to minorities, being scaled back (as well as reverse discrimination which is the practice of favoring those who were previously oppressed). One of the major social concerns of the 1980’s was abortion. After the Roe v Wade of 1973, opponents began to organize and the Supreme Court ruled that states were allowed to impose restrictions to abortion.
The New Right was a political movement that originally began as a reactionary response to the counter culture movement spreading across the United States in the mid 1960s. The New Right ascended to national political prominence in the 1970s as a conglomeration of many different political groups, including many single issue action groups. The ideologies of this movement were expressed in three issues: a desire to see the country to return to its fundamental traditional values both politically and religiously, and the devotion to idea of national conspiracy theories, real or imagined. The New Right saw the democratic upswing and counterculture of the 1960s as the “decay” of traditional American values.
Michael Oakeshott and Edmund Burke have very similar views on Conservatism, yet they both use different styles of writing and fundamental reasoning to justify their views. Though Burke expressed his views on Conservatism in 1790 and Oakeshott wrote in 1962, 172 years later, the two men have astonishingly similar explanations of Conservatism. They share similar thoughts on conservative themes such as gradual change, the embrace of familiarity, and agree upon their distaste for rationalism. Though the two authors have slightly contrasting reasons for their beliefs and ways of writing about them, the assumptions they make regarding conservatism are notably alike despite the substantial time gap between them.
The economic inequality gap was widening with no end in sight and the pipeline to a good life had dried up for many. Middle-class working Americans needed a more stable economy, and the Republicans who openly opposed liberalism seemed to be the answer. Different areas of American society were all affected by this rapid societal change, and most of them were nostalgic for times that seemed easier, more prosperous, and less chaotic. Each of these unhappy parties turned their efforts into one giant Conservative movement in hopes of countering the rise of liberalism and unsatisfactory political and social
When trying to define a word such as Liberalism it seems difficult to find a solid definition. There are different forms of liberalism and different meanings depending on the time period it is being applied to (idea taken from Phil Badger author from philosophynow). To solve this ambiguity, I’ve decided to define liberalism based on the time period in which I will be conducting my research. Liberalism in the 1700s was the belief of freedom and equals rights generally associated with the enlightenment thinkers, John Locke and Montesquieu (as defined by wikipedia.org). Liberalism didn’t start in the 1700s.
There are two objectives of this essay; first is to prove that conservatism in Michael Oakeshott’s ‘On Being Conservative’ piece is logical and valid on two premises: a) the maintenance of order to promote stability in practicing conservatism in government despite adopting radical approach in its other activity, and b) its cautiousness that makes it relevant to practice. Secondly, to argue that Oakeshott’s conservatism, is however incomplete and flawed as it does not provide the alternative of progressing, plus not considering the variations of individuals in the society. In order to critically analyse this essay, we need to understand what influenced him, hence his political theory. Oakeshott is considered as a skeptical philosopher and is
Spearheading the New Right were evangelical Christian groups such as the Moral Majority, a political group, who were dedicated believers who enjoyed startling success as political fund-raisers and organizers. Moral Majority was important, because it helped to block the adoption of Equal Rights Amendment. Neoconservative thought Though Ronald Reagan was no intellectual, he drew on the ideas of a small but influential group of thinkers known as “neoconservatives.” The neoconservatives championed free-market capitalism liberated from government restraints, and they took tough, harshly anti-Soviet positions in foreign policy.
It can be hard to find your political view. Sometimes it takes time and research on political issues in our country and around the world. There are two popular political views; conservative and liberal. The definition for a conservative; is holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion. Liberal definition is; open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.
Conservatism was an ideology in which people had ideas and beliefs to preserve the current order. Conservatives believed in tradition over reason and in the hierarchy of birth rather than liberals, who believed in the hierarchy of merit. Conservatives believed in security and stability as well. One of their great leaders, Otto von Bismarck, created social programs, health programs, and guaranteed retirement programs for society. Conservatives believed that being loyal to the state will insure that you will be protected by the state.
Conservatives object to the capitalist exploitation of the industrial working class, yet certain aspects allow the conservatives to sympathize with the workers during the Industrial Revolution. The Conservative movement became prevalent during Napoleon Bonaparte’s reign and the time period of the Industrial Revolution in Europe. During this time, conservatives and nationalists prevail as the two major political entities. The conservative movement is a “left wing” conspiracy of equals, lead by Prince Charles Louis. During this period, the White Terror Movement strives to restore an absolute monarchy, and the effort was attained by killing Jacobian supporters.
When it comes to the Republicans, they are known to be conservative. Political parties fuel the fire of our nation's citizen’s political views.
