ipl-logo

Neonatal Ethics Case Study

1723 Words7 Pages

Introduction
Infants are unable to make decisions about their healthcare, so therefore they don’t get to choose whether they get a chance at life or not. This highly debatable and important topic, neonatal ethics, includes withdrawing or withholding treatment for newborns. When it comes to making these decisions there is some criteria that must be taken into consideration. This includes looking at the treatment choices and deciding whether they will benefit or harm the baby, the short-term and long-term prognosis and the overall chance of surviving treatment and then future quality of life (Pfeiffer 2008). In most cases if there is a good chance of survival, the parents and physicians will agree on treating, but in some cases the parents choose …show more content…

Back then Esophageal Atresia was treatable and had a wonderful prognosis. Down Syndrome is a condition that anybody can live with and have a quality life filled with happiness. Baby Doe’s parents decided not to treat the condition. This resulted in them going before the hospital judge, who ruled in favor of their decision. The ruling was appealed and went to the Indiana Supreme Court and they also ruled in favor of the parents. Unfortunately it never made it to the US Supreme Court because Baby Doe died April 15th of complications from starvations and dehydration (Resnik 2014). This specific case was so controversial that it resulted in the Baby Doe Rules, which set treatment requirements for newborns and gave specific criteria that were exceptions. The exceptions are if the baby is comatose and not going to wake up, if the treatment will only prolong dying, if it won’t effectively correct all the life-threatening conditions, if it will be more futile than beneficial and if the treatment is inhumane (Michler 2013). Based on these criteria, in Baby Doe’s situation, the treatment would have corrected the condition and Baby Doe could have ended up living a long and happy life. After my research on Baby Doe I found a few smaller cases that have different situations and outcomes, but they could have gone differently if things were done …show more content…

The ethical arguments consist of basically choosing whether to treat the patient or not. Some of the questions are “should treatment be started at all?”, “should life-sustaining treatment be discontinued once started?” and “Is palliative care the best option?”. These are decisions made based on each individualized case because they are all different. The principles that relate to these cases are Autonomy, Nonmaleficence, Beneficence and Justice. Autonomy is giving the patient rights to make their own decisions for themselves, but because these patient’s are too young to do that, their parents make the decisions for them. Nonmaleficence means to do no harm. This particular principle is difficult because by doing no harm the doctor’s should be treating them in order not to let them die, but also not treating them can result in their death. This is where beneficence comes in because it should be creating the maximum benefit for the patient and doing the least harm possible at the same time (Beauchamp 2007) Justice should be taken into consideration because every patient should be treated equally even in different situations (Beauchamp 2007). Unless there is an exception for their condition, they should be getting all treatment possible. The theory that applies most here is Utilitarianism. I’ve mentioned multiple times that the treatment option should be the most beneficial to the

Show More
Related
373 Words | 2 Pages

St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital is considered a global leader with a high standard Code of Conduct. They apply the code daily to every decision that must be made. The code applies to all employees, contract staff, vendors, trainees, students, volunteers, and board members. St. Jude’s mission is to advance cures for diseases through research and treatment. Race, religion, or a family’s ability to pay would never affect the hospital’s decision to treat a child.

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

The Andrew Bedner Case There are many cases of child abuse around the world. But in the case of Andrew Bedner there are many ethical issues and in the end the case is not resolved in a proper amount of time. Bedner abused his baby and tried to take advantage of the fact that he was the surrogate. The baby died before the court could decide on appointing a new surrogate.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

Given that the infant, like any infant, is not a person, as I see it, I think that it’s ethically defensible to say we do not have to continue its life. It doesn’t have a right to life”. It’s a jarring opening statement to say the least,

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

The ethical principle of autonomy provides for respect for the patient’s autonomy to make decisions and choices concerning their life and death. Respecting the patient’s autonomy goes against the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. There also exists the issue of religious beliefs the patient, family, or the caretaker holds, with which the caretaker has to grapple. The caretaker thus faces issues of fidelity to patient welfare by not abandoning the patient or their family, compassionate provision of pain relief methods, and the moral precept to neither hasten death nor prolong life.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

The Terri Schiavo case was a huge start of the “Right to Die” movement, the underlying cause of Schiavo’s collapse was never given a diagnosis. Consequentialist moral theories focus on how much good can result from an action. Non Consequentialist moral theories or Deontological theories, consider not the consequences of an action but whether they fulfill a duty. Some theories that can be used include utilitarianism, Kant’s ethics and natural law theory. Being aware of the case already, I believe there should be some sort of law that gives doctors to comply with the wishes of the patient if they are in a lot of distress.

Read More
1467 Words | 6 Pages

This strong belief against only using medical help was heightened by the doctors frustration towards the Lee family for not following instructions, as well as the difference in perspectives of seeing Lia’s condition as special, the Lee family feeling as if Lia was “like a member of royalty” (Fadiman, 1997, p.22) due to her condition, and the doctors stubbornness to treat it with a multitude of medications with negative side effects. Unfortunately, the combination of not understanding the medication application, as well as conflicting culture beliefs, lead the doctors to think the Lee family was not complying with them, and felt “Lia’s parents were endangering her health” (Fadiman, 1997, p.79) which lead them to contact child services. This process of taking away Lia, which only worsened her condition, could have been handled more appropriately if the doctors had underwent enculturation, being defined as “the process of learning behaviors, languages, beliefs, and roles common to ones first or home cultures” (Barrera et al., 2012 p. xx), this allowing the doctors to not think poorly of the Lia’s parent’s but instead understanding of the cultural beliefs and reasons for them. However, it would be unfair to state the doctors didn’t give the Lee’s the benefit of the doubt, Fadiman (1997) stating that Neil, one of Lia’s doctors, “postponed calling Child Protective Services for as long as he could, giving Lia’s parents every possible chance to reform, talking the case over with his wife every night” (Fadiman, 1997, p.79) and only reported the family under the true impression that he was doing what was in the best interest of

Read More
2084 Words | 9 Pages

The Ethical and Legal Issues of Mrs. McGoldrick’s Case: An Analysis Using the Four-Box Method The case of Mrs. McGoldrick is one related to key ethical issues of dignity in dying, patient refusal of potentially life-sustaining care, and navigating conflicting interests among family members, clinicians, and patients. An analysis of Mrs. McGoldrick’s case, using the four-box method (Medical Indications, Patient Preferences, Quality of Life, and Contextual Features) adapted from Jonsen, Siegler, and Winslade’s guidebook on clinical ethics, is below (1). Medical Indications

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

In the Baby K’s case we all had very different answers, but all agreed that death should be allowed. The one consistent thing being that Baby K did not have any mental awareness. It seemed that there was similar points made about how she had no future.

Read More
1726 Words | 7 Pages

Ethical differences can occur because of individual perseption of a subject or event (Legal dictionary, 2017). The ethical difference even may be political or religious in nature (Legal dictionary, 2017). Legal reasoning helps people to distinguish between what is right within society compared to what they think they should do. In this case, the moral reasoning is to end the patients suffering and to allow the resident to die is the kinder option (Moore, 2017). The legal reasoning in this case would be to honor the families wishes with the exception that the decision for life saving treatments was made in a malicious manner (Moore,

Read More
1546 Words | 7 Pages

It is nearly impossible for the patient to rely on another person to make the best decision that they would have made for themselves, particularly when it involves personal interests such as profiting from a will. If there is something to gain, the family members’ motives seem questionable. If the patient falls ill, then there lies a possibility that their heirs will hope for the patient’s death so that they could receive their inheritance. The inability to confirm whether the family actually has the patient’s best interest in mind supports the argument that any form of euthanasia is unethical. Moreover, health care costs for terminally ill patients, including nursing homes, prescription drugs, and home health care deserves consideration.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

The physician is rendering the aid the patient requests and respecting the patient’s autonomous decision to exercise their right to

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

In Dobson (Litigation parent of) v. Dobson, a grandfather attempted to behave on behalf of a baby born with cerebral palsy, supposedly because of a automobile accident in which the mom became the motive force. He tried to sue the mother with negligence in driving. The mother turned into in favor of the fit succeeding, as it might have supplied her with finances to raise her disabled infant, whilst her coverage agency became defending the suit thru subrogation. mentioning the city of Kamloops v. Nielsen, the courtroom decided that courts can not impose a obligation of automobile e on a pregnant woman toward her fetus as it would intrude with the exercising of her autonomy rights throughout pregnancy, and the issue in defining a preferred of care in pregnancy. handiest a legislature can do this.

Read More
1711 Words | 7 Pages

As the parents of the child, the parents would seek to act for what is best for the child. When a child does not want a vaccination or to go to the dentist, the child refuses. However, the parents still force the child to receive the vaccination and go to the dentist because there are beneficial effects that come from the small amount of pain they will experience. A parent’s consent for a bone marrow donation of a potential child stems from similar reasoning. Even though the child will experience pain, Anissa’s life will potentially be saved by the donation and a greater good will be achieved.

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

Infants who are eligible for infanticide must have truly terminal conditions and require constant care and surgeries. If the infant is truly terminal and requires constant medical care and surgeries, then infanticide would prevent enormous health care costs from being incurred by his or her caretakers. Infanticide would prevent enormous health care costs to their caretakers. While it depends on the tolerability of the parents and their financial situation, an infant with a critical terminal condition can be devistational (Williams 2012). But it is not just the parents and family who suffer the burden of a child with a severe mental and chronic physical disability.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

The baby even if in the very early stages of lifetime, has a right to life, a purpose and a future, and should not be punished. Each of us was a zygote and then grew up in to a person. This person is a unique one, a part of the society, living his life and has future plans and of course glad that he was felt worth and given a chance to be

Read More

More about Neonatal Ethics Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document