ipl-logo

Nick Kouvalis Arguments Against Global Warming

1538 Words7 Pages

Global Warming has been a heated deliberation for decades discussing whether it is happening and if humans are responsible. Either conclusion will result in decisions that will shape the world. It is evident that global warming is a real phenomenon caused by man’s use of fossil fuels. The evidence for the existence of global warming and its connection to carbon dioxide is not ignorable, and points to humans being the culprits. The scientific community accepts global warming as being a valid scientific theory. The arguments based on science against global warming argue that global warming has to do more with nature and less to do with humans and carbon dioxide. Many global warming deniers sometimes claim that global warming is some part of …show more content…

Many global warming deniers postulate that there is a conspiracy either to get more funding or to “make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive”, as the president of the United States said in a tweet when running for office (Trump). Usually arguing anything supporting global warming is either over exaggerated or fabricated, that the conclusions made by institutions like NASA should be ignored in favor for people like Dr. Easterbrook. They often base their judgment on their personal experience. Such the common statement made by people like Nick Kouvalis who twitted, “what a night for climate change” while showing a picture of snow (Kouvalis). People have a distrust of global warming research because many believe that global warming is more about politics than it is about science. According to Patrick More who states in “Global Warming Myth” that the global warming movement happened because of communism, “‘reason environmental extremism emerged was because world communism failed, the Berlin wall came down’ ” (Contoski). Global warming is often tied to politics by people who attempt to disprove it. A website blog “Posts about global warming on A Thinking Person, a.k.a. Cogit8R.” global warming was turned into a political issue instead of a scientific debate as to “tarnish science with politics.” (Hamilton). Even if it has been tied to personal views and politics, global warming is a scientific theory supported by evidence collected by people with no political agendas. Hasty generalizations is not a replacement for research. Throwing out all the data, observations, and expert conclusion to support a particular view is what being biased means. Anyone can believe anything admittedly if they are going to cherry pick the data. Personal experiences and conspiracies are a horrible way to build an accurate picture of

Show More
Related
703 Words | 3 Pages

A few months ago, strange, frigid weather was sweeping across the nation. Some places saw their first snowfall in eight years. Other cities ended up being colder than cities that were closer to the North Pole. Scientists believe that this is because of global warming. Some people don’t believe that this weird weather means that global warming is a serious thing: “Some question how it could be so cold if the planet is heating up.

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

The text's meanings and purpose are climate change labels, the climate change debate, and the ‘science’ surround climate change. Moreover, in comprehending implicit-purpose, the text leans in favoring climate change. The text provides cynical adjectives in associating the term “deniers.” Words like “manipulating data,” “phony skeptics,” “ludicrous claims,” “cherry-picking,” and “Holocaust” are used relating to

Read More
1289 Words | 6 Pages

Matt Ridley and National Geographic have posted articles in attempt to persuade their followers in their opinions of Global warming. Matt Ridley, a man well experienced in almost all forms of fuel, has found a plus to global warming. In his argument Why Climate Change is Good for the World, where he is trying to persuade and educate the people of the world who dislike global warming, he uses very persuasive writing techniques such as placing one of his good arguments first and his best argument last and sandwiching his important but not his best arguments in the middle. He uses popular symbols in his argument to get his audience to relate to his case. Lastly he criticizes the old thought of global warming with valid reason to persuade the audience but also acknowledges that even his argument has flaws by stating the flaws and allowing his audience to disagree.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Global Warming from Three Perspectives Richard Lidzen’s article Global Warming: The science in Three Nutshells explores the idea of global warming from three different perspectives, the scientists, the skeptics and the media. The opinions seem to be similar but their differences are what the article is focusing on. There is a lot of information out there and Lidzen is set to clear that up. The scientist in Lidzen’s article are part of the United Nation and the University of East Anglia.

Read More
1959 Words | 8 Pages

I 'm not usually stunned by opinion regardless of how delusional the foundation of it is, but even the hardened polemist may wince at the vehement aimed at global warming skeptics / deniers. Debate is a wonderful thing if it is about interpretations surrounding water tight credible data; I crave for hard evidence - herewith, while seeking it the waters become murky and the rhetoric shifts onwards to comparisons you 'll never dream of... A war veteran 's letter illustrates this point with bells on. "Propaganda by global-warming skeptics and deniers remind me of 1944, when as an Army officer I saw living skeletons in striped pajamas. Horror stories about Nazi concentration camps suddenly rang true.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Global warming is an issue that constantly threatens not only American lives but all lives. The effects of global warming have been captured and seen but repeatedly ignored. These crucial political choices deterred from the fact that Global warming is far more than a political issue but more of an ethical issue as it may endanger the lives of millions. Unlike many politicians, Al gore insisted that matters such as global warming is extremely important and should be dealt with quickly and accordingly. In order to push this agenda, Al gore toured around the world, preaching to ‘non-scientist’ in order to sway their opinion on Global warming but also strengthening the support people already had towards global warming.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Scientists theorize that that carbon dioxide, gases, agriculture, technology and human activities are the reason for the sources of the global warming. On the other hand, the non-believers feel that a less than one degree increase over the past 100 years does not merit the global warming term. The constant debates between if the climate change is real or not, makes this a perfect conspiracy theory. In this essay you will encounter different

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

I agree, it is factual that we are facing severe environmental challenges. Even if the skeptics do not believe in the global warming, it is undeniable that the air and water pollution are caused by human activities. It is unhelpful to argue who is right, who gets more evidences or who eventually wins. If people just ignore the negative environmental impacts and do not implement any practical plans to deal with, our future generation will definitely suffer from

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

“Global warming is too serious for the world any longer to ignore it’s dangers or split into opposing factions on it, Tony Blair.” The disregard by scientists of global warming does not remove the problems of disturbing the balance of habitats, negatively affecting the human body, and affecting the natural forces of nature, making us doubt the negation of global warming due to its horrific effects. My rebuttal coming from a site that negates my position that global warming is, in fact, real, and a serious problem. In an article coming from Conserve-energy.com, it states in years in the past artic ice has “increased by 50%” which negates the concept of a gradual warming in temperature around the earth. This article also so presented studies

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

Despite the abundance of evidence that exists to prove that climate change does exist, there are still scientists and scholars who are skeptical about the claim. A major argument against climate change existing is that climate has changed before so human beings cannot be the reason for climate change - 33% of Americans agree to this statement ("Americans’ Knowledge Of Climate Change"). This is true that the climate has changed before. Greenhouse gases were involved in most of the climate changes in Earth’s history. When the gases in the Earth’s atmosphere were reduced, the climate on Earth became colder.

Read More
1697 Words | 7 Pages

The existence of climate change has been a heated debate between scientists and the public. Portions of the public do not believe in climate change even if they have been presented with scientific evidence that supports it. The thought processes of those who do not believe in climate change can be seen through the development of conspiracy theories. The development involves the acquisition of information, the reasons for developing a theory, and the actual development of the theory. The concepts that are at the heart of this process can also be employed to move away from conspiracy theories.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

Climate change is refers to the rise in average surface temperatures on earth, mostly due to the burning of the fossil fuels such as oil and coal, which emits greenhouse gases into the atmosphere which are primarily carbon dioxide, water vapor, methane, nitrous oxide, and chlorofluorocarbons (#02). In addition, other human activities, such as agriculture and deforestation, also contribute to the growth of greenhouse gases that cause climate change (#01). According to this, many have make their own conclusions on how are humans responsible for climate change and whether or not it is a real thing. Some people think and guarantee that climate change is real and it is happening at least in part because of human activity.

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

B. Thesis: The causes of global warming and climate change are because of increased emissions of greenhouse gases, and the effects of this are rising temperatures and more severe natural disasters. II. Body A. Counter Claim: Most scientist and people believe that humans are the cause of global warming because of the emissions that they put into the air, but there is a small percentage of people who think that global warming is not caused by emissions at all. Support with MLA citation

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

Climate Change is something that we have caused because of our choices to burn fossil fuels, at some point we have to face the problems that we have created. The consequences of Climate Change are horrific and Climate Change could end our existence as a species, most people do take action against Climate Change except, The Government of the United States of America, refuses to accept the serious dangers of climate change and continues releasing propaganda on Climate Change, claiming its effects are minimal and that we are not causing it. Peculiar how almost every other government in the world thinks otherwise. The reasons we are heading in the wrong direction is because the actions of humans are causing Climate Change, and almost all scientists agree on this matter. Another reason is the that the government isn’t trustworthy in what they say about Climate Change, meaning what they say about Climate Change is wrong, and we should change our policy on Climate Change.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

This problem is controversial because some people believe that that global warming isn 't real and others believe it is. There is evidence that global warming is real because some scientist agree that the earth 's rising temperatures is due to all of the pollution. My opinion on it is that it is clearly real and we need to do something to stop it. If we do not stop all of the pollution in this world, it can affect everyone 's way of living in the future.

Read More

More about Nick Kouvalis Arguments Against Global Warming

Related Topics

Open Document