ipl-logo

Labels In The Climate Debate By Justin Gillis

447 Words2 Pages

The article is titled Verbal Warming: Labels in the Climate Debate, by Justin Gillis, from the New York Times. Upon reading, the author is presenting information on “how pro-climate change scientists are petitioning news media in changing the current climate label from “climate skeptics” to “climate deniers.” In evaluating the text within the article, the qualitative measures of text complexity would be extremely demanding in student comprehension regarding the meaning, structure, and language/knowledge.
The text exhibits multiple levels of complex meanings within the article. Students would struggle with differentiating between the different meanings in the text. The text's meanings and purpose are climate change labels, the climate change debate, and the ‘science’ surround climate change. Moreover, in comprehending implicit-purpose, the text leans in favoring climate change. The text provides cynical adjectives in associating the term “deniers.” Words like “manipulating data,” “phony skeptics,” “ludicrous claims,” “cherry-picking,” and “Holocaust” are used relating to …show more content…

The text uses flashbacks and flash-forwards. The text starts with current time then jumps back decades ago then to a year ago. Also, the qualitative measure with the graphics is propagandized. Appendix A states “graphics tend to be simple and either unnecessary or merely supplementary to the meaning of texts of low complexity” (p.5). In the text, structure a dismal graphic with the word “Skeptic” include an automobile, airplanes, and smokestacks excreting puffs of carbon dioxide. The middle graphic depicts a consequential view showing the Aurora Australis with a colony of emperor penguins in Antarctica. Lastly, the bottom picture depicts a cheerful graphic with the word “Denier” surrounded by reindeer, rabbit, and butterflies which demonstrates the newly deserved label

Show More
Related
1533 Words | 7 Pages

He pulls quotes from Benjamin Strauss, the vice president for Climate Central who has “a Ph.D. in ecology and evolutionary biology from Princeton”(Williamson 2) and Rob Painting, a “true believer who writes for Skeptical Science”(2) who is simply “a former police officer who is really, really interested in global warming” (3). While Strauss is more qualified to speak on behalf of the science behind climate change, the leading climatologists of the world are nowhere to be seen. Instead, Williamson uses these two, less credible, sources to drive his point of opposition further and more

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

In the article ‘Why Bother?’ Michael Pollan, a Professor of Journalism at the University of California, examines the dangers of climate change and how ordinary citizens can reduce its effects on the environment. Although most scientists are concerned and have warned nations of its disastrous effects some still deny the existence of climate change. As if melting ice caps and the ever-increasing blue waters were not enough proof, some citizens believe that climate change is an “unproven theory or a negligible contribution to natural climate variability” (Hall 3). Nevertheless, citizens who believe in global warning can change how they live for the better.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Almost anyone who will read this essay has undoubtedly heard of the climate phenomenon Global warming. Global warming is a topic that gets discussed very often nowadays, most notably during political debate and discussion. Politicians use certain stances on global warming to appeal to voter’s emotions and logic in order to gain votes and support for their campaign, however climate change is nothing new, during the past several hundred thousand years the Earth has heated up and cooled down and even experienced so called “ice ages”, which is a period where glacial deposits located at the northern and southern hemispheres have grown due to dramatic global cool downs. Don’t be confused by climate terminology though, the global warming so widely

Read More
1346 Words | 6 Pages

Global warming has been a growing issue to global security, with nations all around the world working to ease the soon possible negative effects. Throughout the world; many media outlets and sources online have covered and have formally addressed this topic. Each media and sources all holds bits of truths inside of them, however, all cannot be entirely unbiased. Most if not online sources covering this topic; list good reasons to battle climate change, due to this they all have their own manipulative techniques used to persuade the audience, favoring the liberal side CNN writes sources and has experts in specific fields to cover a topic relating to their political agenda, Nasa being a very pro-science uses logos to persuade the audience, CNS

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

Hi Classmate, To be honest with you, after reading this article and the other so far in this class, this presidential administration has really touched a nerve. I think our policymakers have set out to confuse the public and it has become a battle over climate science. Through this battle, Scientists and journalists have decided to go straight to the public, whereas before they would go straight to the politicians in a straighter formal format. Justin Gillis's article in the New York Times, “Climate Change Is Complex. We’ve Got Answers to Your Questions” is an example of striving to create a simplified way of explaining global climate change to the public, because the science community is having to climb over mountains that President Trump and his administration have created.

Read More
1243 Words | 5 Pages

The early 1900s was a time of great strikes over fierce nationalism, social activism, and protest. Florence Kelley, a United States social worker and reformer, spoke out against child labor and the horrible conditions that children were required to bear in order to feed their families. Her speech, delivered before the convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia on July 22, 1905, successfully improved conditions for working children. The language Kelley uses in this speech establishes herself as a leader who has the same values and goals as her audience, but also creates a sense of culpability and sympathy from the many mothers and women in the convention in order to gain their support in her cause.

Read More
232 Words | 1 Pages

In the introduction of Michael Pollan’s Why Bother?, he addresses the title’s question , what he calls the “big question” that people concerned with the fate of the planet must face themselves. Through exploration of global warming and environmental crisis, Pollan’s desire is that his readers gain a deeper understanding to what “really is the big question facing us as individuals hoping to do something about climate change.” (Pollan 312) In expressing his goal of writing Why Bother?, Pollan greatly relies on ethos in the introductory to strengthen his argument. By asserting the different aspects, both scientific and personal, of global warming that he has considered and researched.

Read More
1220 Words | 5 Pages

For example, in the months before the EPA announced its repeal of the Obama administration’s central carbon pollution-reduction policy in October 2017, references to climate change were wiped from many of its websites and climate scientists were reassigned to new departments (Water, 2018).” Much like in Fahrenheit 451, society is censored from information in this case global warming. Climate change activists are plagued

Read More
1752 Words | 8 Pages

Comparative Analysis Naomi Klein’s and Collin’s may not have the same ideological terms and definitions to approach global warming; thus, they both share the idea to demonstrate the global warming change as a facing danger that we must eradicate. Collins with “Toxic Loopholes” emphasizes more on investigation and international negotiations in environmental law. Naomi focuses on recruiting people for “blockadia” activism sharing her activism through her journalist job. Naomi believes that we are “guests” on this planet capable of changing the royal society and the nations with renewable energy. Her work stands out because she demonstrates real-life stories together with an analysis in powerful, abrupt and memorable ways.

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

Bryce Richards Brenda Yoakum ENG105 25 April 2023 All the Ways the Most Common Bit of Climate Misinformation is Wrong Climate change is caused by the combination of natural and human factors, but the overwhelming scientific consensus is that human activity is the primary driver of the current rapid warming trend. Howard Lee's article, “All the ways the most common bit of climate misinformation is wrong”, uses tone, sentence structure, and repetition to sway the opinion of the reader.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, I think it is unlikely that most people would listen to a climate expert instead of a religious figure, unless of course that religious figure is citing a climate expert or is one themselves. The argument would be more effective to an outside audience had more appeals to ethos been made. When it comes to the second passage, the argument would be effective. As previously mentioned, I am not a legislator nor a lobbyist. I believe that the author is targeting those people specifically as they have the power to implement what the author is advocating for.

Read More
1959 Words | 8 Pages

I 'm not usually stunned by opinion regardless of how delusional the foundation of it is, but even the hardened polemist may wince at the vehement aimed at global warming skeptics / deniers. Debate is a wonderful thing if it is about interpretations surrounding water tight credible data; I crave for hard evidence - herewith, while seeking it the waters become murky and the rhetoric shifts onwards to comparisons you 'll never dream of... A war veteran 's letter illustrates this point with bells on. "Propaganda by global-warming skeptics and deniers remind me of 1944, when as an Army officer I saw living skeletons in striped pajamas. Horror stories about Nazi concentration camps suddenly rang true.

Read More
1183 Words | 5 Pages

Science is a controversial topic that has been debated as early as people started to question what humans know about the world. Even today many debate science, and the topic of climate change and this debate goes back to the 20th century where trailblazers tried to wake the public up to the world around them. Science is about evidence, so the fact that it became a political debate is an irrational development. Rachel Carson, a trailblazer of the 20th century, shook the world with her research awakening the American people, stood against all odds, and contributed to today’s society. Rachel Carson was a researcher and was infatuated with nature and very troubled by the damage done by man.

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

Also, sea levels will rise along inhabited shores, even covering some small islands. Plenty of species will be wiped out. Yet many people around the world believe global warming is not an issue, or even real, but many people do believe also. The people who don’t believe Climate Change is an issue, or even real, are referred to as “Climate Deniers” by some, and people who believe global warming exists are sometimes referred to as “Global Warming Cultists”. These titles are usually used when one side is talking about the other.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

Part 1. Two common arguments against human-caused climate change are “greenhouse gases aren’t causing climate change – it’s actually the sun, volcanoes, or some other source (Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, 2011),” and “there is no solid evidence of global warming (Herath, 5 Oct 2011).” The first argument, pertaining to greenhouse gases not causing climate change and the sun or other sources being the cause, is made by skeptics because of natural changes being a major source of Earth’s climate change. The second argument, “there is no solid evidence,” is made because, for example, when there are harsh winters that include blizzards, there is no evidence that points to an increase in temperature – rather, there is a decrease in temperature at that time. Many do not want to accept the fact that they may be contributing to the man-made cause of climate change.

Read More

More about Labels In The Climate Debate By Justin Gillis

Related Topics

Open Document