ipl-logo

Nietzsche's Concept Of Responsibility

1155 Words5 Pages

Nietzsche ‘s critique on the traditional concept of responsibility is heavy handed and sometimes quite harsh. It’s ludicrous to believe in this traditional notion, firstly because responsibility and moral judgement is merely a construct and, secondly, free will cannot account for a cause to an action or effect. Nietzsche criticises western notion of responsibility through deconstructing conceptuality and causality. Both are concepts which are, such as language, manmade constructs- fictions. Language is used to communicate, but not to thoroughly explain. How then can moral judgement be passed when actions cannot be thoroughly explained, according to Nietzsche? The traditional concept of responsibility uses causality to attempt to understand …show more content…

It does not condemn morality, but rather reconsiders western morality. Nietzsche’s merely questions the value of responsibility attributes to life. Behind the curtain of abstract concepts lies a world unrestricted by abstract concepts and symbols. Concepts are once again emphasised as man-made constructs. Nietzsche states that concepts, however, are “never the objective grasp of some essence” (Raffoul, 2010, p. 83) and it is not some inherited transcendental knowledge. Concepts were invented by man to make sense of his subjective world. Language and concepts have no anchor in the objective world. It does not come from the ‘real’ world, but from the anthropomorphic world of humans. There’s no objective validity in concepts and are therefore fictitious or false (2010, p. 83). The subjective anthropomorphic view constructs a reality which hides the ‘real’ world. For Nietzsche, language and concepts are the shadows in Plato’s cave. Concepts are vague images of the real which are recognizable to everyone. It eliminates the individual experience with a material object and generalises it (2010, p. 89). Language makes communication easy and fluent, but fails to intimately explain experiences. Concepts also allow humans to understand their world, to appropriate themselves in relation to everything around them. It ‘humanize[s] things” (2010, p. 85) which is almost a type of mechanisms to allow …show more content…

How can moral judgement be passed if the concept (a subjective construct) responsibility and morality is detached from any objectivity? Furthermore, objectivity cannot be restricted by binaries such as good and evil. With that said, it seems life negating to pass moral judgement on a peer based on a code of morals without an objective foot to stand on. Nietzsche is also concerned with another leg of the traditional concept of responsibility: Causality. Nietzsche maintains that: Firstly, free will and unfree will does not exist and an actor does not act out of free will. This allures that the actor is not the cause of an action. Secondly, causality is misused to organize the chaos of life in something comprehendible to human subjectivity. Cause and effect is not objective ordering of events. Cause and effect is used out of fear of the foreign. We connect a sudden action to a memory in our past, which is familiar to us. This link is the cause, which re-establishes a sense of security to the individual. Concepts such as responsibility and causality are flawed and subjective, which for Nietzsche is very problematic when individuals do not recognize these concepts as fiction and rely on them as objective

Show More
Related

Accountability In Elie Wiesel's Night

1101 Words | 5 Pages

As a child, one is oftentimes told to put thought into one’s actions to avoid the predictable, unpleasant consequences of a hasty performance. During an individual’s youth, the value of accountability is tremendously emphasized by one’s parents and educators. Children are taught that they must be held responsible for their actions, and, as they age and grow into mature individuals, they take on accountability for others. Being responsible means having a duty or an obligation to diligently fulfill a certain task, and as an individual matures, his or her obligations begin to encompass not only the responsibility one has for oneself, but also social accountability. Nevertheless, when one is faced with demanding obstacles, one’s sense of obligation to others may become compromised.

Read More

Civil Disobedience In Letter From Birmingham Jail

400 Words | 2 Pages

Isn’t this like condemning the robbed man because his possession of money precipitated the evil act of robbery? Isn’t this like condemning Socrates because his unswerving commitment to truth and his philosophical delvings precipitated the misguided popular mind to make him drink the hemlock? Isn’t this like condemning Jesus because His unique God-Consciousness and never-ceasing devotion to His will precipitated

Read More

Possible Worlds Why Do Children Attend By Alain De Botton

1351 Words | 6 Pages

Gopnik continues her article about children using their past to shape their future. She introduces the topic of causal understanding. Causal understanding includes the understanding the relationship between cause and effect. When people understand the relationship between cause and effect, it can allow them the change the process of habituation. Learning what goes wrong in life, can help assist breaking bad habits.

Read More

Sanity And The Metaphysics Of Responsibility By Susan Wolf Summary

1508 Words | 7 Pages

In the paper “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility”, Susan Wolf discusses her ideas on what is necessary for an individual to be responsible for their actions. She argues that in order for the person to be held morally responsible for their actions, they need to be morally sane. To consider one to be morally sane, this individual must have an ideology that is able for them to distinguish right from wrong. Hence, a morally sane person must be able to reason and have a sound mind. Furthermore, Wolf establishes the sane deep-self view by applying other philosopher’s ideas.

Read More

Impossibility Of Moral Responsibility By Galen Strawson

878 Words | 4 Pages

Lucy Bichakhchyan Introduction to Philosophy Second Short Written Assignment GALEN STRAWSON THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Galen Strawson is a British philosopher, who is famous for his philosophical works on free will, panpsychism, causality, determinism etc. This paper is about his article “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility”. The title of the article already gives away the stand that Strawson has considering Moral Responsibility..

Read More

An Analysis Of Joyce Carol Oates 'Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been'

733 Words | 3 Pages

Why do individuals do certain things; one may not understand the consequences of an action, or realize that it has a positive or negative effect on the present and future of their lives. The cause of an action can tell why it has a specific effect. For instance, a short story by Joyce Carol Oates titled, “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been” is very interesting and allows you to make inferences based on the information given. One can evaluate from the material given the causes and effects of certain situations. This story is about a teenage girl named Connie, who replaces the traditional family values with her own because of how the music of that time period influenced her.

Read More

Freewill And Determinism By Saul Mcleod

669 Words | 3 Pages

The question of if humans are truly responsible for their own actions has sparked a debate in humanity throughout history. In the non-fiction article, “Freewill and Determinism” written by Saul McLeod, he compares the different aspects of freewill and determinism. Throughout the article, McLeod explains how freewill and determinism, while very different, go hand in hand with each other. To go with that, in the play Macbeth, written by William Shakespeare, many of the explanations in the article as to why people do what they do can be helpful when trying to figure out Macbeth's poor decision making. To begin the story, Macbeth was a trustworthy and loyal warrior for King Duncan.

Read More

Socrates And Nietzsche's Expression Of The Lion In Every Man

1119 Words | 5 Pages

Another thing Socrates is famous for is his twisting of nature in a paradoxical way to serve his own desire to persuade: to Socrates, virtue, wisdom, and eudaemonia are directly linked, a recurring idea in many of his dialogues. His definition of happiness and morality is far different from anyone else’s, especially from Callicles’ and Nietzsche who believes that the law of nature takes over (also perceived this way by Nietzsche). E.R. Dodds mentions the idea that Nietzsche finds a reflexion of himself in Callicles, ascetic Socrates’ most interesting interlocutor in the “Gorgias”. Interesting in the fact that Callicles appears to be a purely hedonistic personage, whose definition of a good life is one where all pleasures of the body are maximised,

Read More

The Yellow Wallpaper Psychoanalytic Analysis

1291 Words | 6 Pages

However, it could also be analyzed from a psychoanalytic perspective. The unnamed narrator has many mental problems. First of all, according to Freud, the unconscious affects the conscious in the form of guilt. The narrator always has an overwhelming sense of guilt. For example, the narrator says "he takes all care from me, and so I feel basely ungrateful not to value it more."

Read More

The Witches Are Responsible For Macbeth's Downfall Analysis

1010 Words | 5 Pages

People are responsible for the consequences of their actions. When people are not responsible for their own actions, they tend to blame others for their problems. The lack of personal responsibility makes us as human beings, less responsible. The more you lack personal responsibility, the more you make excuses in order to get out of your own personal problem. In the story, Macbeth, by William Shakespeare, it shows Macbeth being a person that has little to no personal responsibilities.

Read More

Masculinity In Arthur Miller's A View From A Bridge

1233 Words | 5 Pages

The responsibility which the characters feel here comes from an impulse of their

Read More

The Moral Logic Of Survivor Guilt Summary

1707 Words | 7 Pages

In “The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt” by Nancy Sherman, one has done no wrong, but still has guilt, even in situations that are unexpected, as this happens way too much, and that those who have done wrongdoing should be feeling guilty. She states, “We often take responsibility in a way that goes beyond what we can reasonably be held responsible for. And we feel the guilt that comes with that sense of responsibility. Nietzsche is the modern philosopher who well understood this phenomenon: “Das schlechte Gewissen,” (literally, “bad conscience”)-his term for the consciousness of guilt where one has done no wrong, doesn’t grow in the soil where we would most expect it, he argued, such as in prisons where there are actually “guilty” parties who should feel remorse for wrongdoing”(Sherman 154). Illustrating, this proves that we take the responsibility for actions that we did not do, and should not feel any remorse, but that the people who have done wrongdoing, should have this feeling of guilt.

Read More

Determinism Vs Free Will

1777 Words | 8 Pages

Determinism, free will and moral responsibility (1681 words) Table of contents: Introduction. Blatchford’s view on determinism, free will, and moral responsibility. Schlick’s determinism, freedom and responsibility. Hospers’s position.

Read More

Free Will: Fate And Fate In The Tragedy Of Macbeth

835 Words | 4 Pages

One of the most critical ideas surrounding tragedies is fate and destiny. The idea that an individual’s life is predetermined is associated with many great works of Shakespeare, and transcending through stories, if human beings have free will. If all humans carry free will, does that mean that all humans are responsible for their crimes and inhumanities. Undoubtedly, both topics are explored through the play, but Macbeth corrupts himself with his own destructive actions. The Tragedy of Macbeth stems from the fearless, hero of Scotland who then turned into a ruthless king who will kill anyone he sees as a threat.

Read More

Ferdinand De Saussure And Wittgenstein: The Nature Of Language

1412 Words | 6 Pages

In the ontological investigation of language, namely the classification of what makes language what it is. Many philosophers are fascinated by the nature of language. Some philosopher holds a view of essentialism that presupposes there is an identical and continuous universals essence, which can justify all human language. However, the objection to Essentialists’ approach to the study of language is that with such assumption of intrinsic properties of language exists, they have presupposed “language” as a constant real substance. Both Western philosopher Ferdinand de Saussure and Ludwig Wittgenstein have rejected the simplistic notion of the essence in explaining the nature of language, and suggest the similarities between languages are merely one side of the linguistic phenomenon.

Read More

More about Nietzsche's Concept Of Responsibility

Related Topics

Open Document