ipl-logo

No Remorse Case Study

781 Words4 Pages

NO REMORSE

Remorse refers to feeling sorry after committing a shameful or violent act. In criminal justice system the promoters of remorse keep up that remorse is an ethical decent deserving of community acknowledgment: when judges adjust a punishment on the premise of regret, they recognize an individual's self-origination and honor one’s autonomy. It is also a proposition that outside of the court, the articulation of remorse can have intense reconciliatory mending impacts for guilty parties and exploited people, and these impacts can even reach out to the whole society by reaffirming social standards and adding to society's ethical training.
Dakotah murdered his grandfather and after going through trials judge declared him guilty of first …show more content…

For decreasing the intensity of violent crimes courts transferred their brutal adolescent offenders to general mature courts. There are various cases of crimes that an adolescent can confer that are harsh and violent enough for them to be treated in grown-up courts. A large number of adolescent offenders are actually able for knowing the moral values and see difference in right doing and wrong doing. As for as treating teenagers in court as mature is concerned, some say quit treating them as matures and treat them as adolescents; others say they must be treated as adults when they perpetrate crimes like mature. I believe that youngsters should be considered responsible for their activities and attempted as grown-ups. It is natural for me to know that if someone harm or murdered somebody who is loved one, he would need him or her to encounter the most exceedingly bad conceivable punishment for his or her …show more content…

It is necessary for the benefit of the society to treat violent teenagers as grown-ups relying upon the seriousness and extent of the criminal act that they have committed. There are numerous factors that help adolescent courts and to what degree an adolescent ought to be treated as a grown-up. Adolescents of today appear to exploit this justice system by perpetrating serious crimes. Because they think that may be out from this game easily, they acknowledge they will be treated as adolescents regardless of the harshness of the crime.
The percentage of savagery in our society today reveals to us that the message that wrongdoing does not pay has not arrived at vicious wrongdoing guilty parties. Adolescent who carry out serious crimes such as murder, rape, robbery etc. ought to be treated in adult court because by doing so it would persuade potential and real adolescent offenders that whenever they perpetrate mature crime, they will serve mature times. Moreover, consistently, the media barrages us with the message that adolescent teens are carrying out numerous fierce, grisly criminal acts that were customarily identified with

Show More
Related
220 Words | 1 Pages

In the article “Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried as Adults” written by Laurence Steinberg, Mr. Steinberg debates that the government should reevaluate how juveniles are punished in the court system. Mr. Steinberg mentions that in modern society’s approach to sentencing minors is to reduce the severity of the crime or treat the offender as an adult. Laurence gives many points as to the minor’s development, both mentally and physically, which may hinder their judgement and understanding of their actions. He also emphasizes on the lack of fairness in the court system for non-violent crimes in regards to minors.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

Some might agree that, “The juvenile justice system is failing to protect citizens from the surge in violent crimes committed by juveniles. What is needed is a system that protects society from violent juvenile offenders, and efficiently rehabilitates juveniles." (G Garcett) The threat of this harsher punishment will result in lowered juvenile crime rates. Juveniles should be convicted as adults for violent crimes because it is not fair for juveniles to commit big crimes and get away with it so easily.

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

In this article,”On Punishment and Teen Killers”, by jennifer Jenkins, explains that juveniles are getting violent and that whatever is influencing them is doing a bad thing to the teens. Teens from probably around 13 to 18 or older are ones to commit murders and are either sentenced to jail for life or probably gotten rid of. This article is also about how teens probably sometimes react when they commit a crime and the penalties that they are charged with. Teens get influenced by games or watch they technically watch and start doing what they are not supposed to. Jenkins has good reasons at times on how she thinks about the teens punishments and how they should be punished.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

The juvenile justice system of the 1800’s is much improved in today’s society and still undergoing changes to improve the system. Henceforth, it can be noticed that the juvenile justice system of the 1800’s until today has undergone drastic changes in such a way that offenders be it youth or minor are tried differently from the adults in all states These changes can be seen when the Juvenile Justice System was under the English Common Law, the colonial era, the industrial revolution era, and the Victorian era. There are more programs developed in today’s Juvenile Justice System, as well as young offenders with regards to age are processed separately, and are not necessarily referred to as chattel due to how profound the juvenile system has

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

When a young person kills, does the child immediately turn to an adult? Or do they uphold some the trappings of childhood, despite the seriousness of their actions? These are among the primary questions plaguing the American legal system in the modern days, as the violent acts of juvenile delinquents continue to be subject of the press. In regards to similarity between the juvenile justice system and the adult criminal justice system, I believe the juvenile system should mirror off the adult system. The fundamental question when it comes to deciding which way to go is; are minors in a position to understand the ramifications of their actions?

Read More
1770 Words | 8 Pages

An adolescent is not allowed to drink, smoke, get married, or sign legal contracts because they aren’t capable of making mature decisions. In many poor communities, the only things adolescents see are crimes. Teenagers are like a sponge they absorb everything they see. Throughout many years, kids have committed crimes that have gotten them unreasonable sentences. From looking at many sources I found that teenagers don’t think of the consequences their actions might have on them.

Read More
1878 Words | 8 Pages

Doing away with juvenile courts would “assure greater procedural regularity in the determination of guilt” and eliminate the immense amount of subjectivity involved (Feld). Although this may assist in assigning guilt among juvenile offenders in more serious crimes, it may be slightly extreme to try minors in criminal court for petty offences. Feld addresses the apparent problem of subjectivity and trying minors in criminal court would help diminish that bias, yet he only considers the application of more serious crimes that would have mandatory sentences of five years or more, not both the serious crimes and the approach to smaller-scale crimes. Although he remains somewhat blind to part of the overall argument, the information provided is well researched and knowledgeable. Feld himself is also highly

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

Since then, more have searched for ways to vindicate juvenile crime and as mentioned in “Kids Are Kids - Until They Commit A Crime”, most proposed that the teen immaturity could be the reason behind their actions, but a crime is a crime,

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

It is well known that teenagers are generally reckless and incompetent. When it comes to violent crimes, when should a teenager be tried as an adult? When a person turns eighteen, they are considered an adult and face the same responsibilities and consequences. They must be able to make their own decisions. Minors accused of violent crimes should not be tried and sentenced as adults due to their childlike behavior and instead should be remanded in juvenile hall until they reach the age of eighteen.

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

Giving consequences to the juveniles not only allows adolescents to understand what is good and wrong but to care for the victims like Bishop-Jenkins, who has lost her beloved sister and her sister’s husband. For instance, Bishop-Jenkins writes in her article “Remember the Victims of Juvenile Offenders”, “Our society is appropriately concerned, as this forum demonstrates, with helping juveniles. Let’s also remember that the victims of violent juvenile crime need just as much of our support.” (Bishop- Jenkins) Although many might think it is cruel to sentence life in prison to adolescents, their action has ended one's life.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Juvenile Justice Argumentative Essay Too many juveniles are let off easy after committing very sinister and violent crimes. Juveniles who commit heinous crimes should all be tried as adults and placed in adult prison. It shouldn’t matter how old someone is, paying for their actions is the significant part. First of all, if the juvenile fits in the criteria, they should be placed in adult prison.

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

2015, Luka Gordic is attacked and killed by three 17-year-olds. 2014, two 13-year-old girls attempt to kill their friend Payton Leutner. 2011, David Vincent is shot at by a 13-year-old and dies. These are all cases of murder or attempted murder, but they were done by juveniles, who can change in the blink of an eye. In today’s world, these youth will be or have been sentenced as adults, with much longer sentences than those of the juvenile court, despite the fact that there are rehabilitation clinics that could have better helped them while their minds were still flexible. Many aspects go on in everyday life for these children, that are very rarely taken into consideration because they’re insignificant compared to their crimes, even though this information could be what makes the case completely flip around. Often they don’t have good role models to show them how to treat others and themselves; they only realize they’ve done wrong when the world tells them, and the world is a harsh master compared to their fragile brains.

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

When teen felons choose to act without thinking, they are putting other people’s lives at risk. They need to be charged as adults because the victims of the crimes will not be given the justice they deserve when they have to worry about that criminal harming them again. Although some people think that sending a juvenile through adult court gives them no hope, they should have given this a little thought before committing the crime. Teens need to think about the consequences and how their actions affect others before they act. When choosing between putting a violent adolescent in prison and taking the chance of letting them commit that crime again, it is most suitable to let the teen be tried as an adult and to place them in prison.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Teenagers are not perfect, and their irrational behavior can lead to poor decisions that could potentially be dangerous and unlawful. A debate has now occurred for many years that deals with the issue of sentencing teens that have committed serious crimes such as murder and robbery. Many people argue that if juveniles commit these crimes that their punishment should be equal to an adults punishment for serious crimes, but juveniles shouldn’t have to worry about their lives getting ruined. Most juveniles and teenagers do not have enough maturity to survive in the adult prison system, and recent brain development research shows us that teenagers brains are not even close to being finished developing. Therefore, teenagers and youth under the age of eighteen should

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

This kind of an action on the part of the offender, justifies the victim’s resentment of the offender. The resentment protests the injustice of the wrong, the victim’s self-worth, and the wrong-doer’s abuse of his moral agency. Having been victimized, many victims are justifiably annoyed, terrified, regretful or even grief stricken. As expected, people assume that victims therefore want revenge and call for blood and certainly sometimes they do. On the other hand, there are some victims who demand justice but are even open to mercy as well.

Read More

More about No Remorse Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document