Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The contribution of George Orwell
The writing of george orwell
The writing of george orwell
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The contribution of George Orwell
The writing of george orwell
The writing of george orwell
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The contribution of George Orwell
Throughout all of history, people have always tried to persuade someone to see their point of view. People from all kinds of backgrounds have engaged in such behavior, whether they realize it or not, in order to convince someone else that their opinion is correct. There have been many who have made themselves known by their opinion and power to persuade others such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. whose words were able to inspire a nation to have a change of heart. Authors, however, make up one of the larger portions of people trying to persuade others to agree with them on a topic. An author such as George Orwell writes in order to persuade others towards the kind of world they should want to be living in, and he crafts his writings in a way that achieves this purpose.
Both Sherman Alexie and Francine Prose utilize various rhetorical strategies throughout their essays to captivate their audience. However, Alexie and Prose present and use these rhetorical strategies in different ways. Prose’s essay contains different components of literary devices than Alexie’s essay. For example, one of the rhetorical methods Prose uses is to take on a certain identity to build her credibility and to strengthen her argument. While Alexie also takes on an identity to fortify his argument, it is a completely different identity than Prose.
In Eli Weisler’s memoir titled “Night” he shares his traumatic experience of the dehumanization and torturous treatment the Jews had to endure during the Holocaust and being held in concentration camps during the period of WW2. Weisler repeatedly uses the phrase “Night” as a symbol. The word “Night” does not only represent the time of day when the presence of light is missing. The word “Night” is a symbol of trauma and loss of faith. Night symbolizes trauma that was caused as a result of being in the concentration camps.
In class we learned about nine different modes of rhetoric and we were asked to use three of them to compare two of the multiple stories we read in class to each other. The two stories I chose were Learning to read and Write by Frederick Douglass and Shooting an elephant by George Orwell. Learning to Read and Write is a non fictional memoir about Frederick Douglass’s life as an african american slave in the south, and the challenges he had learning to read and write. The second story is shooting and elephant by george orwell which is also non fiction about Orwell's time as a police enforcer for the british empire occupying India and how he struggles to deal with an elephant. A theme of both these stories is oppression and how Douglass and Orwell both feel the same way about it, even though one is the oppressed and the other is the oppressor but are both stuck in their social roles and can’t change their situations.
Throughout his literary works including his memoir Night and speeches "The Perils of Indifference" and "Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech," Elie Wiesel emphasizes his purpose of informing and persuading people to take action against atrocities. Wiesel passionately advocates for awareness and prevention of such events in the future. As a Holocaust survivor, Wiesel's personal experiences provided a deep understanding of the harsh realities of genocide. In his speech "The Perils of Indifference," Wiesel explains, "Indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor--never its victim."
Choosing sides always comes into play when regarding social and moral injustices. In “To Kill a Mockingbird”, Harper Lee experiments with neutrality and prejudices in Maycomb County pertaining to the oppressor and the oppressed. Similar to Elie Wiesel’s Nobel Peace Prize speech in 1986, where he justifies that it takes more courage and bravery to fight for something you don’t have to. In 1986 Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and humanitarian, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.
Night, “The Perils of Indifference” and “Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech”, written by Elie Wiesel, are made to persuade and inform people of the horrible things that are happening. Not just what is happening but how it is being overlooked even though some people know it is happening. In all the pieces he has written above he gives information on many events that happen where people know what's happening but do nothing to stop it. So Elie Wiesel's reason to persuade and inform the people is to stop people from overlooking tragic and inhuman acts and stop them. Wiesel is speaking and writing about this to persuade the people who hear him speak or read his novel to stand up to the things that did and are happening, so events like the Holocaust never happen again.
In Elie Wiesel’s Nobel peace prize acceptance speech, he exemplifies how seeing people in need and not helping them is a crime against humanity and as someone ignoress them more and more people become bitter and truly evil. This is shown in his acceptance speech when Elie states “The world did know and remain silent. And that is why I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.
Language: “The voice came from an oblong metal plaque like a dulled mirror which formed part of the surface of the right-hand wall.” (2) “Day and night the telescreens bruised your ears with statistics proving that people today had more food, more clothes, better houses, better recreations... Not a word of it could be proved or disproved... It was like a single equation with two unknowns” (74) L(1) George Orwell, the author of 1984, uses figurative language within this quote with a perfectly crafted simile.
Language is a major themes in both novels “1984” by George Orwell and “The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwool. Language are heavily reshape in both novel in order to crave a goal to control individuals. “1984” creates authority over citizens through altering and reducing the English language to its most basic form. To “return” to the root of English, the Party have to eliminate the complexity of the language - synonyms and subtle meaning of words -from the existence of the people minds in the apparent belief that there is no justification from antonyms and ‘shades of meanings’, and only one concept should only subsist . However the true purpose of simplifying language and destroying words is to eliminate concepts that might led to the idealism of rebellion and disobedience; The Party does not want the thoughts of rebellion and disobedience to exist therefore they have to destroy and simplify to a huge extent.
By limiting the vocabulary, Newspeak is essentially “unintelligible” and hence controls the people’s understanding of the real world. Orwell emphasises that language is of utmost importance as it structures and limits the ideas individuals are capable of formulating and expressing. In 1984, language is used as a ‘mind control tool’. The party slogan, “war is peace, freedom is
During the unjust times of the holocaust, thousands of Jews were being tortured and killed as the world stayed silent. In Elie Wiesel’s “Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance” speech, Wiesel shares the horrendous and unjust times of the holocaust and the impact on how nobody decided to speak up. As a quiet survivor of the labor camps Wiesel had first hand experience on the silence all the Jews encountered during the unjust times of the holocaust. Through the use of the rhetorical appeals ethos and pathos, supported by the figurative techniques of anaphora and motif, Wiesel persuades the audience to use their voices against any form of injustice. Through the use of ethos, supported by the figurative technique of anaphora, Wiesel persuades the audience
Aldous Huxley strongly advocates this idea as he writes from the perspective of an English citizen during an unsettling and conflicting time in history. The essay “Words and Behavior” proposes that language interconnects with war and the politics that shape our views and history. Simultaneously, Huxley states the malignant power a word’s connotation holds when it comes to formulating our perspective on governmental affairs. The essay starts off describing
Along with this, Orwell openly portrays his anger revolving around the destruction of the English Language. In prior writings, Orwell displays his disgust at the evolution of language and his unhappiness in the migration of shorter, unexaggerated sentences to the lengthy wording of simple phrases. In Orwell's writing titled “Politics and the English Language,” he states “no modern writer of the kind I am discussing- no one capable of using phrases like “objective consideration of contemporary phenomena”- would ever tabulate his thoughts in that precise and detailed way,” a passage which thoroughly depicts Orwells contempt of modern writers. By incorporating Old English language into his writings, Orwell subtly displays his unrest with the modernization of our language.