ipl-logo

Non-Profit Organizations: Wikileaks By Julian Assange

1924 Words8 Pages

WikiLeaks is a non-profit organization founded in 2006 where one of the founders is Julian Assange founded with a purpose of publicizing the apparent war transgressions of the United States, particularly the treatment of Guantanamo war prisoners. Other exposures were done through the Afghan diary in 2010, and the exposure of governments of their misdemeanor and misconduct which would have never been known since were government secrets. Regarding employees, WikiLeaks has run on volunteers especially from the Asian origin. The company is run by an advisory board made of Assange and the deputy Jash Vora and another seven members (Domscheit-Berg, Klopp, & Chase, 2011). By 2009, the company had registered more than 1200 volunteers through their …show more content…

Therefore, when information is shared it may result to the citizen not trusting its government. This may bring up uprising which affects the social, economic and the political status of a country. Investigative journalism needs to be conducted in a manner where information is collected without compromising any of the people involved (Tanner & Richardson, 2013). Therefore, when there is for a journalist to be able to show how the information was accessed. Unfortunately, that is not the case with WikiLeaks because the information is accessed in a manner that is not known or clear and no one can be traced to show where the information originated. Thus, the ethical issue that WikiLeaks has is whether it is doing the right thing by providing information that states would have preferred to be confidential and whether the information is beneficial to the public.
The current society is perceived to be free, and thus, people in a free society need to know the truth despite the fact that the truth becomes treason. Thus, the existence of an organization such as WikiLeaks is that it is incredibly beneficial to the society. Truthfully, for democracy to function, there is the need for the general public to know what their government is doing publicly and secretly. This is where WikiLeaks comes in where there has been the debate on whether what its function is legal or illegal and unconstitutional by releasing …show more content…

Therefore, it shows that the United States will side with a dictator such as President Mugabe and not a leader fighting corruption and enhancing democracy among the Zimbabweans. Thus with the help of WikiLeaks, one can know the truth about the nation. In the same case, Tsvangirai may present himself as a leader that would change the outcome but again with the information provided to the United States by the diplomats indicate that there is a weakness that would affect the country if they were to choose him as the next president of the

Show More
Related
1185 Words | 5 Pages

WikiLeaks has released numerous documents “to bring important news and information to the public” so that “readers and historians alike can see evidence of the truth (What is WikiLeaks, 1). ” There are numerous reports on the imprisonment of journalists within the United States who have released government information to the public. This website provides a platform for journalists and the like to supply government information to the public that would otherwise be kept from them. Due to the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution that allows freedom of the press, Congress is unable to pass a law that would prevent WikiLeaks from providing such information to constituents. The United States government, however, is presently trying to terminate the WikiLeaks website and is encouraging search engines to prevent the WikiLeaks website from appearing in their searches.

Read More
59 Words | 1 Pages

Being an Intelligence Analyst in the military, Chelsea Manning’s job was to handle classified information, but she discovered documents that revealed atrocities committed by the US in Iraq. Feeling compelled to let people know what was happening in the Global War on Terror, she promptly released this sensitive information to a website known as Wikileaks for all to see.

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

Bringing “muckraking” into the 21st century limelight, Assange started WikiLeaks in 2006 to provide a place where whistleblowers can anonymously share classified documents under Assange’s editorship. Far from being a traditional journalist, Assange doesn’t personally investigate crimes or abuses, but supplies an instant, worldwide forum for those who do. While Assange himself is difficult to praise with his persecutions and charges, this does not discredit his solidity in creating a place made to drag truth into the light. It has been debated on for years upon whether or not WikiLeaks causes more harm than “good”, but what WikiLeaks actually does— to political parties, the military, and other powerful entities— is pull back the curtain of censorship, twists, and deception to show the public what’s really going on. The website provides raw data in the form of emails, documents, and videos; it does not tell the public what to think, but incites them to see the evidence and decide for themselves.

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

For example, Edward Snowden exposed the National Security Agency for eavesdropping on Americans and people around the world, despite the possibility of being arrested and charged with heavy crimes. " So, what did the leaks tell us? First, they confirmed that the U.S. government, without obtaining any court warrants, routinely collects the phone logs of tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of Americans, who have no links to terrorism whatsoever,"(Source 3). The question is who is truly at fault? The government for doing that or Snowden for ratting them out to the public about

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

Snowden, who was a computer systems contractor, worked for the National Security Agency and revealed to the public how the American Government was spying on its own citizens and foreigners. Snowden was committed to the truth which allowed him to reason and understand the difference between what is right and what is legal. Snowden was convinced that the truth requires an individual to do the right thing and not necessarily what is legal. However, doing the right thing could sometimes require an individual to break the law.

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

A few weeks later, these documents were released by The Guardian, and Edward Snowden was the reliable source. Now, people all over knew that the United States Government was spying on its own people through messages, internet searches, browser history, smart T.V’s and many many more. This case is ongoing, as he seeks asylum in other countries. This newfound information raises the question, is Mr. Snowden a traitor, or did he save us all by “blowing the whistle” to warn us about the unconstitutional collection of our private possessions protected by

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

Whether it’s just trying to get the information out there or trying to prevent these situations, news reporters make society uneasy because of the information they are putting out into the world

Read More
1326 Words | 6 Pages

Freedom of the press is a crucial component for a free and democratic society. The press serves as a “watchdog” for government and other powerful institutions, providing information to the public while holding those in positions of authority accountable. Without the ability to report on government actions and policies, citizens would be left in the dark about the workings of their democracy. One of the most significant lessons that can be learned from movies and current events about the importance of a free press is the role that the press plays in exposing corruption and abuse of power.

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

The government debated about Snowden being considered a traitor or patriot of the country. The definition of a traitor is a person who is guilty of treason or treachery in betraying friends, country, family, etc. Definition of Treason is the crime of betraying one's country, by attempting to kill, sovereign, overthrow the government, or giving aid and/or comfort to the enemies government. Snowden was not giving aid or comfort to America’s enemies, unless the citizens of America are considered the enemy to the

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

And the WikiLeaks documents do not show important differences between what the government is telling the people about the War on Terror and what it is saying behind closed doors (Farhi

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

This can project the people from anything they would disagree to occur. Democracy is based on the rule of equality which means that all the people are equal as far as the law is concerned. Every person has the right to enjoy and experience social, political and economic rights and state is not allowed to discriminate him on the standard of gender, class, property or religion.

Read More
1471 Words | 6 Pages

The main issue in the Snowden controversy is the conflicting rights of private individuals and the US government with regard to the use of telecommunications and the internet. There are ethical issues surrounding this controversy and the most applicable ethical approach for this case is “Ethics by Rights Approach”. As a background, the reason why US government had declared Edward Snowden a traitor is his involvement in the leaking of about 1.7 million confidential US documents, 15,000 Australian intelligence files and 58,000 British intelligence files from the National Security Agency (or NSA) to the public. These confidential information were acquired by the NSA through the PRISM program by collaborating with big internet companies such

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

From the two stories “The Gift of the Magi” and “The Scarlet Ibis” I feel that “The Scarlet Ibis” is the more effective short story because of the emotion that the story carries and because of the context that the story displays. ”The Gift of the Magi” has a theme that touches the readers in a special way because they feel the love that the couple Della and Jim display for each other in the book. The theme of the book “The Gift of the Magi” is about love. It's a story about a poor,young couple that their love for each other is the most important thing in life, and they both give up their most precious possessions to be able to afford presents for each other on Christmas Eve.

Read More
1885 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction According to Alford (2007), a whistleblower is one who speaks out against illegal or unethical practices in school or in the organization where he or she works. Whistle-blowing, is an essential factor for pin-pointing and eradicating unethical activities in most organization set ups (Brown, 2008). According to Sawyer, Johnson and Holub (2010), most individuals disregard the idea of whistle-blowing because they fear that they will be avoided and could end up losing their job careers and also their good names. When an individual is torn between two or more deeds and have virtuous reasons for choosing each action, this is regarded to as an ethical dilemma.

Read More
1159 Words | 5 Pages

First of all, it is important to know the definition of democracy and its aspects. According to Peter Joyce (2005), the democratic government was initiated in the Greek city state of Athens in the fifth century B.C., so as a consequence, the word ‘democracy’ derived from two Greek words, demos (meaning ‘people’) and kratos (meaning ‘power’) , which means ‘government by the people’. Secondly, Giovanni Sartori (1997), a Political Science Researcher states that ‘democracy’ is an abbreviation that means Liberal Democracy. He distinguishes three aspects: democracy as a principle of legitimacy (power not derives

Read More

More about Non-Profit Organizations: Wikileaks By Julian Assange

Related Topics

Open Document