Is it really possible to have an inclusive and tolerant society? Visions of inclusive and tolerant societies have been part of human civilization since the very beginning. The term “Utopia” coined in Greek by Sir Thomas More, which our school recently did a presentation on, idolized a perfect civilization, a time without crime, and of course of inclusion and tolerance within communities. In the Judeo-Christian-Islamic world, there is the idea that we began in the Garden of Eden and will return to the Kingdom of Heaven. Plato wrote about how to do it in The Republic. Many indigenous cultures have myths of a legendary time of ideal life that Mircea Eliade called illo tempore. Buddhism proposes a practical model of an ideal life that is peaceful, …show more content…
We should not feel powerless for we actually possess an enormous capacity to wield power. Nonviolent action is a way of using that power-the power of people. The tools of nonviolent action putting a group together to confront a problem, to organize a grassroots network, to demonstrate solidarity with victims of intolerance, to discredit hateful propaganda are available to all those who want to put an end to intolerance, violence and hatred. After making a society tolerant, what else needs to be done? The answer is simple: Very less. As I have stated above, once a society becomes tolerant, it will automatically become inclusive. Even so, there are certain things that still need to be done to promote the intermingling of people and the broader prospect of happiness. Promoting social integration: Recognized as one of the main of the main goals of social development, social integration is perhaps the best and only way to create an inclusive society. Social integration encompasses all the values that an inclusive society should have. Social integration is understood as a dynamic and principled process of promoting the values, relations, and institutions that enable all people to participate in social, economic, cultural and political life on the basis of equality of rights, equity, and