ipl-logo

Northern Triangle Of Central America Essay

508 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Death penalty as a deterrent

Should be The Death Penalty Approved in Northern Triangle of Central America?

Crimes are the main reason of death in northern triangle of Central America’s countries, such as El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. Moreover, these three nations among the top five crime rates in Latin America. The governments spend time and money in order to prevent the murders but the statistics does not show a reduction in crimens. On the other hand, the coercive system is a tool that the governments use to eradicate the violence. But another way to prevent the crimens is a stronger law that includes death penalty. The biggest questions may be, what is the meaning of death penalty? and in what kind of crimes this law should be applied? Although some people think that the prison is a strong punishment, criminals continue committed crimes,for that reason, the only solution to reduce the murders and …show more content…

As a first issue that the death penalty can have is that innocent people can died.. The opponents say that this law is unfair and innocent people can died. According to an inform for the Columbia Human Right showed the case of Carlos DeLuna a man who was died in the hands of the death penalty. In this case the state of Texas do not show evidences like DNA, they only use a eyewitness testimony to convicted Carlos DeLuna. Also, two decades after the execution of Carlos DeLuna people knew the truth about the case and men was innocent. This case is one of the many cases where innocents person died. For that reason, people who is against consider that the death penalty can kill more innocent people than guilty. In addition to that point, in countries like El Salvador and Honduras where government do not have a good resources to investigate thoroughly this kinds of laws can be dangerous. On the other hand, this point can be refuted with only one thesis. The law needs to be reform not to be eliminate. The solution for that is simple types of

Show More
Related
1325 Words | 6 Pages

The death penalty on the other hand would have been effective if the overall public minded to consider it a system for ending criminal acts. While a monstrous number would ensure the nonattendance of the death penalty in their real system, the wrongdoing rate continues going higher for countries that still practice the death penalty. Regardless, there is lacking accurate data to exhibit that death penalty has been convincing similarly as maintaining a strategic distance from criminal acts. It infers

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Many innocent lives are taken due to the death penalty which are often the direct result of bias and discrimination. Needless to say, the death penalty is a poor and definitive response that cannot be undone. Combating this matter requires government intervention, and entails prohibiting the death

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

In another case, a man named Carlos DeLuna was sentenced to death and executed in the year 1989 for stabbing a gas clerk to death. DeLuna claimed he was innocent to the end. After he was killed, a report was published proving his innocence. If for no other reason, the death penalty should be abolished for the one in twenty-five innocent people that have been

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

At the point when managing Capital Punishment there are a wide range of strategies they use in the detainment facilities. Presently the act of the death penalty is as old as the administration itself. The death penalty is a legitimate infusion of capital punishment in which it is utilized for lawbreakers. As I would like to think, the demise of the criminal I think it rely on upon the individual whom did the wrongdoing and in addition the casualty family whom ought to have the capacity to see the crooks passing not the entire world. In the wake of perusing and doing research on the death penalty it has its genius and cons which will be clarify later.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

The outcome out of it that there is a lot of issues that arise with the death penalty such as moral situation, and innocent lives being taken away, when they shouldn’t be. According to the article “Death Penalty? Yes or No” (2009), “Among other factors cited by opponents of the death penalty is that it is barbaric and violates the cruel and unusual clause in the bill of rights”. This violation as a citizen affects the rights of the people and showing individuals that is acceptable to kill in a way of recommending the death penalty. Another negative impact on capital punishment, it causes incredible suffering and pain for the sentenced and brutalizes society.

Read More
1239 Words | 5 Pages

To prove this thesis the subjects of the death penalties history, international neighbours who still use this form of capital punishment,

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

Should America continue to allow the death penalty? This essay will tell you why America should not be continue the death penalty. For starters, the death penalty is punishment by death; usually resulting after a crime that America calls capital crimes or capital offences. There are many of reasons why the death penalty should not be carried out in America or anywhere “Application of the death penalty tends to be arbitrary and capricious; for similar crimes, some are sentenced to death while others are not.”

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

This article discusses individual cases and crimes and gives analysis of the arguments made against death penalty in real world. Firstly it discusses the deterrence argument while going through a number of cases. The conclusion is that it has no effect on reducing homicides but ironically it breeds violence as in some cases offenders committed a capital crime in a territory where execution still prevails while they could have easily avoided it. Second thing discussed is the cost, the research in article shows that it costs significantly more money to put a convict to death than to incarcerate him for life in a prison. Moreover it is shown that in many cases criminals are executed while there are reasonable doubts in their convictions and some have avoided execution by just a few hours before being exonerated.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Back in 1796 there were more than 10 innocent people killed and today about 4.1 percent of the people executed are innocent, and that’s more than enough. I think it is un fair to families, friends and the defendant to have their life taken if they are not guilty, If the law officials cannot prove whether or not the defendant is guilty then the death penalty should be abolished. Now on the other side, executing someone who is actually guilty; I do not support this either. I strongly believe that someone who commits a capital crime and has received the death penalty deserves to suffer for the rest of their life. Democratic leaders will be the ones to change the death penalty.

Read More
125 Words | 1 Pages

Although Texas is the state with the greatest number of death row sentences and executions, it has one of the highest crime rates in the entire nation. Therefore, the death penalty is ineffective because it does not diminish the incidence of crimes, take the life of innocent people, is racially unequal, costly, and alternative measure can be implemented

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Ever since the outset of the American Constitution, capital punishment has existed as a crime sentence in the United States. However, in recent decades, this topic has become highly controversial, as many states have dictated against the death penalty. Although states with this position on capital punishment are increasing, some states, such as Texas, have continued to edict this practice in their provinces. In the State of Texas, the sentence to death upon a person should not be permitted due to the fact it can wrongly convict a person, its court trial is highly expensive, and it brings forth an unjust treatment.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion the idea that the death penalty should be abolished can be supported by many reasons that include extensive evidence. With the death penalty still established we are putting innocent people's lives at risk, spending millions, and continue with racial segregation. The idea that someone's opinion in court can decide the fate of another person is

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Death penalty takes away innocent peoples life, according to amnestyusa.org “Since 1973, 140 people have been released from death rows throughout the country due to evidence of their wrongful conviction. In this same time period, more than 1,200 people have been executed”. This means that 1,200 innocent people have been killed for not doing anything wrong. Based on deathpenaltyinfo.org, year 2000 had the highest recored execution at 98 people, and in 2014 the was only 35 executions. The execution rate seems to be going down, but they are still occurring which needs to change.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Why death penalty must end ‘’An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,’’ said Mahatma Gandhi. The execution of someone who has possibly done a crime is an inhuman act. Death penalty is hypocritical and flawed. If killing is wrong, why do we kill when a criminal has done the crime of killing someone? In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money.

Read More

More about Northern Triangle Of Central America Essay

Related Topics

Open Document