ipl-logo

Nurture In Frankenstein

1609 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Nature vs nurture in human development

In the book Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the creature is raised by nature rather than nurture. Human nature is defined as our psychological characteristics , feelings, and behavioral traits shared by mankind. Human nature by itself gives humans the ability to feel and socialize, but without nurture we wouldn't be different from one another. Nurture gives humans an identity, while nature allows humans to function properly. Human nature is an important part in how humans behave and interact, but it does not play a part in the making of our individuality. Nurture is one of the most important processes in life because it encourages the growth of our personality and identity. Nature and nurture can determine someone's identity, but there are …show more content…

A limitation of nature is that people can overcome their genetics and turn themselves into what they want. “While genes are pivotal in establishing some aspects of emotionality, experience plays a central role in turning genes on and off. DNA is not the heart’s destiny; the genetic lottery may determine the cards in your deck, but experience deals the hand you can play. Scientists have proven, for example, that good mothering can override a disadvantageous temperament”( Thomas Lewis).” This quote shows that genes are just your nature, and you can alter nature with good nurture. Another disadvantage to nature is that people are less accepting, they tend to judge others because their nature is not the same as their own. “There was none among the myriads of men that existed who would pity or assist me; and should I feel kindness towards my enemies? No: from that moment I declared everlasting war against the species, and, more than all, against him who had formed me, and sent me forth to this insupportable misery (124).” This quote shows readers that the townspeople are not accepting towards the creature because he wasn’t nurtured like they were, and he didn’t act the same as they would. The creature knows that no one understands his situation and that no one feels sympathy for him. Being shunned and disrespected makes the creature angry because all he wants is …show more content…

Human nature gives humans the ability to feel and socialize, but it does not encourage the growth of our personalities. Nurture is much more important than nature because it helps the growth of your personality and identity. Nurture and nature can both be large factors in how a person will develop over time, but nurture will be more influential than nature in most cases, with some advantages and limitations. Both nature and nurture are very important in human development; nature is important because it gives humans the ability to function, while nurture is important because it helps determine someone's

Show More
Related
271 Words | 2 Pages

It is disputed whether nurture or nature is more dominant in forging a person’s identity. Whether a person is happy or sad, kind or cruel, smart or unintelligent is based on their genetics or the environment around them. Of course, both factor into the equation, but one does more so than the other: while people can have genetic differences, the way that they are raised is far more influential on their personalities. Firstly, the book “Lord of the Flies” has many instances where it is clear that outside factors are more prominent than inside ones when it comes to one 's temperament.

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

The expression “nature vs. nurture” describes the question of how a person's characteristics are formed. Nurture shapes individuals personalities, although nature is who we truly are. Nature is shown when humans feel threatened or scared. Fear drives humans to lengths they usually would not go to, all because of a natural instinct to survive. From “The Biology of fear and anxiety related behaviors'', “Fear results in the expression of a range of defensive behaviors which are aimed at escaping from the source of danger or conflict.”

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Nurture influences a person’s personality more significantly because it sparks mental development, gives life experiences, and changes the way people express themselves. To start, nurture is fundamental in

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

The theme of nurturing, or how the environment contributes to a person's character , is flooding throughout the novel. With the turn of every single page, we dive deeper into the examples of nurturing which contrast with Victors lack of parental role with his “ child” aka the creature. Mary Shelley's description of victor's model parents contrasts with his infatuation to create the creature known as frankenstein. Margarets correspondence with Walton at the beginning of the novel also compares with shelley's description of victor's home life: both of these men were surrounded by caring nurturing individuals who considered the wellbeing of their loved ones at all times. Predictably Walton's ambition to conquer the unknown moves him, like it does victor further away from civilization and closer to feelings of

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Nature is the predetermined traits that people are born with, while nurture is the influence that affects people after they’re born. The debate surrounding Nature V. Nurture is how much of a person’s traits is predetermined and how much is influenced by the environment. Mary Shelley's believes in nurture more than nature. Victor Frankenstein has certain traits that he’s born with. Frankenstein is born into a prestigious, wealthy family.

Read More
180 Words | 1 Pages

In the Old Cherokee Legend, the “evil” and the “good” wolves relate to the nature vs. nurture debate because we are born with both happiness, the “good wolf”, and the bad, the “evil wolf.” Through time one will receive characteristics through both nature and nurture. Nature is where you are born with it, or heredity. Nurture is what and where you were born and raised, or learned. Nature will start in the womb and nurture will start when born.

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

Frankenstein’s creature initially shows no signs of ill will or malice when first encountering human beings (Shelley 72-73). On the contrary, through careful observation he is able to learn more about human society and personal relationships. He begins to admire the close connection between the people he observes and respects their virtue. This, however, makes him realise what he is missing. Observing the love and affection between others only increases the effect his own solitude has on him.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

The creature was as helpless as a baby, he had no sense of right and wrong. His nature did not help him very much, by making him feel dreadful about himself, the people around him felt the same exact way he felt about them. The themes nature and nurture fit into the argument of the growth and actions of the Monster, they both play a crucial role in the Monster's murderous temper. The Monster’s general personality was all he sees and hears around him, which connects to the concept of nature . He copies what others do around him; like a baby, he can only act in ways he has been self-taught.

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Although, this may be a possibility, nurture is the most outstanding characteristic represented in the book. Mary Shelley represented this throughout the entire book. For instance, even though Frankenstein was on the opposing end of hatred and violence, he still saw love and affection as in on looker of the daily life of the cottagers. The creature saw how Felix and his wife interacted and was able to identify it as love. Love, which was a feeling he so desperately wanted to experience, due to the fact that he never remotely felt such an affair.

Read More
1819 Words | 8 Pages

Nature V.S. Nurture in Mary Shelly's Frankenstein Mary Shelly's Frankenstein discusses the nature of human begins, whether it is simply one's natural instinct to act maliciously or if it's one's surroundings and environment that impact their behavior. Victor Frankenstein, the protagonist of this intricate novel, answers this question in two ways, as both the product and the perpetrator of how it is both in the nature of a person, and their nurturing that develops their behaviors, and in the case of this plot, malicious behaviors. Since a young age Frankenstein desired knowledge, constantly seeking for greater wisdom, while his father did not care for this. His passion for learning wasn't something that his parents conditioned him into, and

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

Regardless of who we strive to be, or who we dare not to be, those who we respect and look up to will be the ones who leave an impression on our lives. To the Monster’s credit, it continued to pursue a life of good deeds until the people it idolized turn on it. Because of the influence made on it by its parental figures the Monster behaves like an outsider, and as an outsider it gains new role models and is governed by new emotions such as anger and hate. The monster should not be blamed for its malicious nature, rather, the people who taught it hate and the Doctor who created it without a true intent of being its

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

The nature vs. nurture debate centers on whether human behaviour and personality are inherited (nature) or acquired (nurture); in other words, whether a person’s environment or a person’s genetic inheritance determines their behaviour and personality. Goldsmith and Harman (1994) adopt a neutral position, in which both nature and nurture influence people, stating that they “believe that the fundamental issue concerns the interplay between characteristics of the individual and of the relationship” (54). Goldsmith and Harman discuss temperament and attachment for infant, with temperament being linked to the nature side of the debate and attachment being linked with the nurture side; as a result, the infant’s temperament influences the attachment bond between the infant and the mother, but the attachment bond influences the temperament of the child as well. Therefore, both nature and nurture interact with each other to produce people’s behaviour (Harman et al. 54). Andersen and Berk (1998) take on the nurture perspective, while Leary (1999) claims that nature is the determining factor of a person’s personality.

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

Nurture can change how you act, and the way you look at things. Nurture has a bigger role in personality than nature. I still have to consider that they both have a role in personality. Many identical twins are different. Personality can change from when you were born.

Read More
1485 Words | 6 Pages

Nature vs. Nurture There have been many nature vs nurture debates throughout years and years. Which one is better, which one is more effective, and which one is most important in social behaviors? Well, my answer is both. I believe human behavior is developed through experiences and biological factors. Every person we meet affects our life in some way and the way our body develops shapes us can determine our future.

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

Nurture is the Key to Human Developments Nurture is the entirety of environment influenced aspects which impact the growth and actions of an individual. Socrates believed that nurture plays a large role in the development of the individual because it can help gain self understanding, decide the way people view the world, and affect people’s nature. By learning knowledge from the world, people are able to identify themselves by understanding things like thoughts, actions, and emotions. For instance: through interactions with others, people can learn what a positive person is like. They have smiles on their faces all the time and won’t easily be affected by bad news.

Read More

More about Nurture In Frankenstein

Open Document