Of Is It A Citizen Of The United States To Vote By Susan B Anthony

633 Words3 Pages

The question of women's suffrage has been a contentious issue throughout history, and two authors, Susan B. Anthony and Emmeline Pankhurst, have passionately argued for women's right to vote in their respective works, "Is it a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote?" and "Freedom or Death." Both authors employ different strategies to make their claims effectively, including using key details, quotations, and emotional appeals.

In "Is it a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote?", Susan B. Anthony appeals to the ethos of her audience by drawing upon the principles of democracy and equality. She argues that denying women the right to vote is unjust and undemocratic, as it goes against the fundamental principles of the United …show more content…

She references the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, highlighting the contradiction between the nation's founding principles and the denial of women's voting rights. She states, "The Declaration of Independence...declares that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed; and the Constitution of the United States guarantees to every citizen the right to vote." By appealing to these foundational documents of the United States, Anthony effectively establishes her argument that women's suffrage is not only just but also aligned with the nation's democratic …show more content…

Pankhurst employs vivid and impassioned language to create a sense of urgency and desperation in her argument. She uses emotionally charged phrases such as "We are here not because we are law-breakers; we are here in our efforts to become law-makers," and "We are here to claim that right, and to insist upon it," to convey the severity of the situation faced by women. Pankhurst's use of strong language and emotional appeals helps to elicit empathy and support from her audience, compelling them to take action in support of women's suffrage.

Additionally, Pankhurst employs the use of rhetorical questions to challenge the status quo and provoke the reader's thoughts. She asks, "How is it that we tolerate this outrage?" and "How can a government treat as criminals those who plead for the sacred rights of free men and women?" These questions prompt the reader to critically reflect on the injustice of denying women the right to vote and challenges the legitimacy of the existing