Of Myshkin In Fyodor Dostoevsky's Idiot '

The Beauty of Myshkin’s Spirit

The Idiot by Fyodor Dostoevsky invites the reader into a world dominated by lust, greed, and human depravity. However, throughout it all, Myshkin stands out as a virtuous glimmer of hope for mankind. In the assigned passage, the reader can see the immense extent to which Myshkin contrasts with the other people in the novel.

In the excerpt we discussed, Dostoevsky provides a prime example of Myshkin’s characterizing charm and appeasing demeanor. We notice that Epanchin is clearly at ease around Myshkin – going as far as complimenting his “simply beautiful calligraphy.” Myshkin, with his personable approach, has clearly deeply impressed upon Epanchin a certain sense of tranquility. For all we know, Myshkin’s

Possessing the type of presence that disarms people at a glance is a powerful tool in which Myshkin harnesses well. Epanchin’s exclamation to

This juxtaposition also allows Dostoevsky to further his religious propaganda. Myshkin’s character and disparities with those around him allow for Dostoevsky to create a champion of the Christian faith. Myshkin is a divine person without holy powers. Instead, he is able to see people who are less moral and worthy than he is. The scene with Epanchin and Ganya harmoniously fits into the greater scope of the novel: Myshkin is coexisting in a society so misguided and corrupt that he clearly stands out as a champion of the light. Delving deeper into the metaphor, Myshkin’s calligraphy brings to attention the way society has gradually shifted from the ideals of humbleness and love to those dominated by greed and selfishness. Myshkin’s writing is a symbol for clarity and piety that withstands the forces of the dark day and age Myshkin inhabits. The pertinent notions that are indicated and extracted from this scene are two-fold. One is that Myshkin is the consummate human who must bear the brunt of wretchedness that surrounds him. Second is the convention of beauty, not necessarily in the physical sense, but in a transcendent way. The representation of Myshkin’s flawless writing speaks volumes to his moral fiber. He does not mask his true feelings behind a facade like Ganya and Epanchin do. While being socially inept and awkward, Myshkin expresses an altruistic outlook on life, without, even for