Oliver Ogelthrope Analysis

As the editor-in-chief of the local daily newspaper, I would publish the photograph of Oliver Ogelthrope lying amongst the wreckage of the church bus. I believe that this photograph has the right both legally and ethically to be published because of the crime committed, however, it should not be the leading image on the cover of the newspaper. The lead story should still be the tornado; this accident is only relevant because it happened in response to the tornado. The emotional impact that a photograph like this could have upon the viewers is the result of a non-related criminal act, unlike the stories published about 9/11 with graphic content that were a direct result of the larger story. Images such as those deserved to be on the front page because they showed how the terrorist attack directly affected the lives of our nation and decisions regarding national security. I am not trying to say that this story or photograph isn’t important, I believe it is which is why I would publish it, but I don’t feel it is a necessity to have it on the cover and that it is more ethical to place it within the pages instead. I feel confident in my decision to publish the photograph because the photograph was

Oliver Ogelthorpe could sue for private facts because this car crash is a deeply private manner that he could argue is no one 's business other than his and his families, and by publishing this story the newspaper was infringing upon is right to privacy. He could also sue them for emotional distress because this car crash can be deemed as an outrageously tragic experience beyond the scope of normality and by having it published he is forced to read and relive this tragic experience, which could cause even further