Omniscient Essay: Microevolution Vs. Evolution

1014 Words5 Pages

“Finally, an omnipotent, omniscient, God does not have to painfully plod through millions of mistakes, misfits, and mutations in order to have fellowship with humans. As the Biblical account of creation confirms, “He can create humans instantaneously” (Gen.2:7)” (Hanegraaff). Even though some believe Evolution comes from macroevolution, “the big bang,” or, the idea that humans evolved from animals, it does not line up with Biblical beliefs and is not true. Microevolution is the idea of small changes over a long period of time in a species, or small group of organisms. “Microevolution happens on a small scale (within a single population) while macroevolution happens on a scale that transcends the boundaries of a single species”(“What is Microevolution?”). The Bible approves of microevolution because the reasoning behind it makes sense in the eyes of science and Biblical beliefs. For example, scientists use three reasons to make their claims that Evolution is true. First, microevolution leading to evolution. Second, “missing links.” Third, the role that fossils is a “transitional forms is speculative at best” (Ramer). However, these three reasons are not reliable …show more content…

Transitional species means, “Fossils or organisms that show the intermediate states between an ancestral form and that of its descendants are referred to as transitional forms” (“Transitional Forms”). The fossil record and the transition of species (fish to reptiles..) is the foundation of the Darwinian theory (apes to humans). But, there is no physical proof that support the Darwinian theory. The Darwinian theory is “Through the billions of years all species of living things evolve from a common ancestor” (Nye) In the days of Charles Darwin, fossils were scarce, but now there should be many more fossils now, than in the days of Darwin, because of advanced technology provided that he did not have. However, there is no fossil