More handpicked essays just for you.
Use of force in law enforcement
The use of excessive force by police officers
Excessive force in the law enforcement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Use of force in law enforcement
On balance, the probative value of evidence of Ms. Fitzgerald’s drug use is extremely high and substantially outweighs any risk of either unfair prejudice or undue delay. IV. MS. FITZGERALD’S PRIOR DURG US IS EXEMPT FROM THE PROHIBITON ON HEARSAY UNDER RULE
Per the summons and complaint, plaintiff claims assault and false arrest. Plaintiff claims that defendant PO Argelis Rodriguez and other MOS stopped him and accused him of throwing away a handgun. Plaintiff states that he did not possess a handgun. Plaintiff claims that PO Rodriguez assaulted him in the head, body, face and buttock. Plaintiff alleges that he was placed in handcuffs then his pants and underpants were removed and he was searched on the ground in public
Auburn Police Records department checked Oleg 's criminal history for prior order violations and it showed Oleg had two guilty convictions for order violations. Because Oleg had two guilty convictions for order violations, there was probable cause to arrest Oleg for Felony Violation of a DV Protection Order. I completed a Superform for Oleg. I included the form in the case jacket, copied it to the V:drive and faxed a copy to SCORE jail. Officer Lewis transported Oleg to SCORE jail to be
raise the issue in her charge. The court disagreed, holding that Farrow limited her charge to events that occurred prior to her discharge in December 2008. In regards to Farrow’s wrongful discharge claim against Dr. Strange, the court found that Dr. Strange was Farrow’s supervisor, not an employer. Therefore, this claim must fail because there is no claim for wrongful discharge against a non-employer. In her wrongful discharge claim against St. Francis, Farrow alleged St. Francis discharged her because of her outspoken disapproval of and failure to comply with changes to certain procedures instituted by St. Francis which required non-nurses to perform certain tasks.
W1063227 Offense: Marijuana possess DOW: 06-18-2015 Bond: $276.50 CASH OR SURETY
The police officer pulled a bag from the Respondent’s coat pocket and found that it contained cocaine. The police officers then arrested Respondent and charged him with possession of a controlled substance. Prior Proceedings: The state trial court found Respondent guilty of the
Julian wants to sue David, the other player. In his complaint, which tort theory is Julian’s attorney most likely to allege and what will he have to prove for Julian to be successful? Julian’s attorney is most likely to allege Intentional Tort for his complaint to be successful. An intentional tort occurs whenever someone intends an action that results in harm to a person’s body, reputation, emotional well-being, or property. During the game David kicked Julian in the head while Julian was in possession on the ball.
It should be noted that Bouldin and Cabral were not under the influence of a controlled substance. I cited and released Bouldin in the field for PC 602(o)-Trespassing, PC 647(e)-Illegal Lodging and H&S 11364(a)-Possession of Drug Paraphernalia (Citation #C432344). Bouldin is scheduled to appear at the Pasadena Court on 02-13-18 at 0830 hours. I cited and released Cabral in the field for PC 602(o)-Trespassing, PC 647(e)-Illegal Lodging and H&S 11364(a)-Possession of Drug Paraphernalia (Citation #C432345). Cabral is scheduled to appear at the Pasadena Court on 02-13-18 at 0830 hours.
Obstruction and Resisting Arrest On 10/26/2015 around 2230 hours, I, Sgt. Samuel Mendoza, was working in the Las Vegas Metropolitan Jail when we received a call that a deputy was bringing in a combative male. I went to the jail entrance to wait on the deputy. When the deputy arrived with the male subject, I opened the left rear passenger side door of the patrol car and began to talk with him.
Per summons and complaint, plaintiff claims assault and false arrest. Plaintiff states that he was watching MOS arrest a woman when a friend, Tiaya Cornelius (non-party) asked plaintiff to help her carry grocery bags to her home. Plaintiff states that an inebriated unknown male attempted to grab one of the bag. Plaintiff states while he and Ms. Cornelius were informing the unknown male that they did not need his help, plaintiff was struck on both side of his head by police batons. Plaintiff claims that he was handcuffed.
: Petitioner, the State of Arizona, sought review of an order entered by the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona, which granted the defendant Pike’s motion to modify his sentence pursuant to Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32. During the time of the offense, a sentence of one year-life was officially put into place. Pike filed a petition for post-conviction relief to have his sentence altered because he believed that his sentence was cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. The trial court granted Pike’s petition and gave him only 15 to 30 years and the state of Arizona filed a petition for review. On July 10, 1975, the defendant Pike was convicted of possession of dangerous drugs for sale which violated the A.R.S. §§ 32-1970(C), 32-1996(C), and 32-1901, and Pike was sentenced to serve a term of not less than 40 nor more than 50 years in the Arizona State Prison.
In the following days, the defendant was arrested after it was established that he was a participant. The defendant was not in the drugstore when the crime took place and, did not shoot the shopkeeper. The evidence I present will prove to
Because Amanda pushed Kalvin and ripped his jacket by grabbing hold of it, there was probable cause to arrest Amanda for RCW 9A.36.041 DV Assault 4th Degree. I advised Amanda she was under arrest and Officer Michels placed her into handcuffs. I advised Amanda of her Constitutional Rights from my pre-printed Miranda card. I asked Amanda if she understood her rights and she stated "yes". While arresting Amanda, she stated she needed belongings from inside, such as a coat and her driver's license, to go to jail with her.
After analyzing the video, I believe that excessive use of force was presented in the Rodney King arrest. The excessive use of force was first seen as soon as Mr. King went down on the ground and the first police officer used his baton to strike Mr. King. After that, the next scene is another police officer pulling out his baton to strike Mr. King as well. It also shows that the police officers are using their foot to kick Mr. King. That is the moment when excessive use of forced have been used.
I. FACTUAL HISTORY On August 16, 2011, Defendant pled guilty for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. There were no disputed facts at the time of the sentencing. A Presentence Investigation Report was conducted, by the Probation Office, to identify ameliorating
