ipl-logo

Passive Brock's Arguments Against Euthanasia

1482 Words6 Pages

In society, euthanasia is considered to be “a good death,” which in other words is a painless way to die. This particular practice relieves the suffering of an individual from any amount of pain, which allows a patient to die in peace. This procedure is not accepted in the greater part of the United States because there is a fear that there will be a lack of medical care if euthanasia became legal. However, when a patient is euthanized, they are relieved of suffering and do not have to deal with consequences. I believe active voluntary euthanasia should be accepted in order to give terminally ill patients a chance to die painlessly. When discussing euthanasia as a whole, there are two types to focus on: passive and active euthanasia. Passive …show more content…

First, Brock points out that it is wrong to kill any human being. Killing an innocent human being is morally wrong and should not be done. In the process of active voluntary euthanasia, the life of a terminally ill patient is ending. If treatment is withdrawn, then the patient is being let to die, which is unethical. Another objection is the idea of bad consequences that come out of euthanasia. When a patient goes to a medical professional, they expect to receive help to get better. However, if euthanasia is permissible and the medical professional feels it is in the patient’s best interest to be killed, then medical professionals lose their moral status, making more patients afraid to go seek medical attention when needed. Along with Brock, there are other Philosophers who feel active voluntary euthanasia should not be …show more content…

The patient must undergo a process in which they are permitted to be actively euthanized. In the steps for following through with active voluntary euthanasia, the patient must request to be euthanized more than once and seek approval from 2 doctors, a psychiatric professional, as well as a third-party candidate that has no connection to the patient. If the third-party candidate has any relation to the patient, either being a family or friend, their opinion could be bias and either accept or withdraw euthanasia for the patient. In order for active voluntary euthanasia to take place, all these steps must be met in order for the process to move along. Brock and Callahan offer valid reasons to not accept active voluntary euthanasia, yet, both of their reasoning can be

Show More
Related

Peter Singer Vs. John Keown: Euthanasia?

873 Words | 4 Pages

In other words, the patient proposes, but the doctor refuses. So, when all the rhetoric about patient autonomy is stripped away, the underlying principle which seeks to justify even voluntary euthanasia is that doctors can make a judgement that certain patients are better off dead. And, if such a judgement can be made in relation to a competent patient, there is no reason in logic why it cannot be made in relation to an incompetent” (Keown, 1997). Here, I believe Keown makes the point that ultimately, personal autonomy does not matter because the decision to euthanize always lands in the hands of the doctor. The patient can only express what their current desire is, but it is the doctor who ultimately must apply the most difficult judgement, that a patient is or is not ‘better off dead’.

Read More

Dan Brock's Views On Euthanasia

1744 Words | 7 Pages

Dan Brock and James Rachel both make persuasive arguments regarding the controversial dilemma "Is Euthanasia morally permissible?". Of the two articles, however, Dan Brock's analysis of the key arguments and resolution of the points brought against euthanasia is the stronger argument compared to James Rachel's moral argument that active euthanasia is permissible because passive is. The main problem lying with euthanasia is simply put, do we as a society weigh actual life more than quality of life. Euthanasia however, should be, and is based upon quality of life, which is why it's morally permissible as a course of action. Dan Brock's Voluntary Active Euthanasia

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide

1861 Words | 8 Pages

Physician-assisted suicide, or euthanasia, is defined as “the act or practice of causing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy.” The controversy over euthanasia pits courts, medical professionals, and the ill against questions of reason, laws, and

Read More

Clive Deverall's Argument Against Euthanasia

820 Words | 4 Pages

Firstly, to understand the full argument, you must understand the topic. As defined in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, Euthanasia is the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. With that understanding it is hard to see why people who are terminally ill do not have the option of having a pain free death on their own terms. Even without a law, doctors have been aiding people to die for years.

Read More

Controversy Of Keown's Arguments Against Euthanasia

992 Words | 4 Pages

Through the decades of patients on direct or indirect life support from traumatic events, disabilities, or illnesses, euthanasia has been a heavily debated practice due to its moral disputes. Euthanasia is a necessary option as patients with clear judgement still have the right to refuse medical treatment and support. However, the practice is often brushed aside because of it impeding doctoral ethics to not harm their patients. Furthermore, one solution to this problem would be to examine the patient’s physical and mental conditions, then to ensure that the patient is mentally stable to make the decision of euthanasia on their own.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Non Voluntary Passive Euthanasia

1449 Words | 6 Pages

When a patient is no longer competent or is physically ill or injured, non-voluntary passive euthanasia has been the term used for when the patients best interest is considered during the process of withholding and withdrawing life support (Varelius, p. 635). In this process death is seen to come about naturally. Arguments arise between suicidal deaths of non-competent psychiatric patient versus non-voluntary passive euthanasia and how they should not be considered different. Non-voluntary passive euthanasia is generally accepted due to deaths related to it are considered natural. The outlook on non-voluntary passive euthanasia is when the life-supporting treatment is withheld or withdrawn from, it is looked at as the death occurred because

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Assisted Suicide

700 Words | 3 Pages

The patient must not be suffering from depression or other mental illness such as Alzheimer’s disease. This presents an issue that the family of the patient cannot make any decisions on behalf of the sick person. Finally, the patient must be diagnosed by a qualified physician. The diagnosis must include a patient who has a terminal illness and less than six months to live for assisted suicide to be performed.

Read More

Deontological Ethics: The Ethical Ethics Of Assisted Suicide

1252 Words | 6 Pages

Assisted suicide is a rather controversial issue in contemporary society. When a terminally ill patient formally requests to be euthanized by a board certified physician, an ethical dilemma arises. Can someone ethically end the life of another human being, even if the patient will die in less than six months? Unlike traditional suicide, euthanasia included multiple individuals including the patient, doctor, and witnesses, where each party involved has a set of legal responsibilities. In order to understand this quandary and eventually reach a conclusion, each party involved must have their responsibilities analyzed and the underlying guidelines of moral ethics must be investigated.

Read More

Hippocratic Argument Against Euthanasia

1071 Words | 5 Pages

Peter Singer once said, “Of all the arguments against voluntary euthanasia, the most influential is the slippery slope: once we allow doctors to kill patients, we will not be able to limit the killing to those who want to die.” Euthanasia is the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (such as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy (ProCon.org). In other words, it is a drug that is given to patients who have decided to take their own life to no longer be in suffering. Euthanasia should not be used because it devalues the human life, it contradicts the Hippocratic oath that is still used today, and euthanasia could be used to control health care costs.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Euthanasia By Philippa Foot

937 Words | 4 Pages

The possible legalization of euthanasia can cause a great disturbance in how people view life and death and the simplicity of how they would treat it. "There are many fairly severely handicapped people for whom a simple, affectionate life is possible." (Foot, p. 94) As demonstrated, the decision of terminating a person 's life is a very fragile and difficult one, emotionally and mentally. Nevertheless, it’s a choice we can make if it is passive euthanasia being expressed.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

1731 Words | 7 Pages

THE EUTHANASIA CONTROVERSY Summary Euthanasia has constantly been a heated debate amongst commentators, such as the likes of legal academics, medical practitioners and legislators for many years. Hence, the task of this essay is to discuss the different faces minted on both sides of the coin – should physicians and/or loved ones have the right to participate in active euthanasia? In order to do so, the essay will need to explore the arguments for and against legalizing euthanasia, specifically active euthanasia and subsequently provide a stand on whether or not it should be an accepted practice.

Read More

Persuasive Speech On Euthanasia

1075 Words | 5 Pages

Euthanasia is usually used to refer to active euthanasia, and in this sense, euthanasia is usually considered to be criminal homicide, but voluntary, passive euthanasia is widely non-criminal. Voluntary Euthanasia is conducted with the consent of the patient while Involuntary Euthanasia is conducted against the will of the patient. Beginning with the philosophical aspects of euthanasia we must first understand the importance of the sanctity of life. Human life is sacred because God made humankind in His own image, and that each individual human

Read More

Pro Euthanasia Speech

1014 Words | 5 Pages

There are many forms of euthanasia. Whether it’s active or passive, voluntary or non-voluntary, most of these forms are illegal in almost every country in the world. Passive euthanasia is refusing treatment and allowing illness or injuries kill you, however active euthanasia is what I’m going to talk about today. It generally consists of injecting a lethal chemical composite dose into the bloodstream that is meant to end your life in the most painless way possible. We live in a world that has opposing viewpoints on this subject; there are those who view it as homicide, and others who view it as the most sincere form of human compassion.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

1016 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION Euthanasia alludes to the act of deliberately close a life keeping in mind the end goal to assuage torment and enduring. There are different euthanasia laws in each country. The British House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics defines euthanasia as "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering".[1] In the Netherlands, euthanasia is understood as "termination of life by a doctor at the request of a patient"". Euthanasia is sorted in diverse ways, which incorporate voluntary, non-voluntary, or automatic.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

1149 Words | 5 Pages

The act of euthanasia, whether active or passive, is heavily obstructed in the medical field. Through medical ethics, the act of passive euthanasia is condoned by withholding treatment and thus, allowing the patient to die. Without any direct contact with the patient, the doctor is not considered as the cause of death. Thus, the medical field views passive euthanasia as of lesser and more permissible value in comparison to active euthanasia. In the statement made by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association, they perceive this as contrary to mercy killing, as it is, the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family.

Read More

More about Passive Brock's Arguments Against Euthanasia

Related Topics

Open Document