ipl-logo

Passive Brock's Arguments Against Euthanasia

1482 Words6 Pages

In society, euthanasia is considered to be “a good death,” which in other words is a painless way to die. This particular practice relieves the suffering of an individual from any amount of pain, which allows a patient to die in peace. This procedure is not accepted in the greater part of the United States because there is a fear that there will be a lack of medical care if euthanasia became legal. However, when a patient is euthanized, they are relieved of suffering and do not have to deal with consequences. I believe active voluntary euthanasia should be accepted in order to give terminally ill patients a chance to die painlessly. When discussing euthanasia as a whole, there are two types to focus on: passive and active euthanasia. Passive …show more content…

First, Brock points out that it is wrong to kill any human being. Killing an innocent human being is morally wrong and should not be done. In the process of active voluntary euthanasia, the life of a terminally ill patient is ending. If treatment is withdrawn, then the patient is being let to die, which is unethical. Another objection is the idea of bad consequences that come out of euthanasia. When a patient goes to a medical professional, they expect to receive help to get better. However, if euthanasia is permissible and the medical professional feels it is in the patient’s best interest to be killed, then medical professionals lose their moral status, making more patients afraid to go seek medical attention when needed. Along with Brock, there are other Philosophers who feel active voluntary euthanasia should not be …show more content…

The patient must undergo a process in which they are permitted to be actively euthanized. In the steps for following through with active voluntary euthanasia, the patient must request to be euthanized more than once and seek approval from 2 doctors, a psychiatric professional, as well as a third-party candidate that has no connection to the patient. If the third-party candidate has any relation to the patient, either being a family or friend, their opinion could be bias and either accept or withdraw euthanasia for the patient. In order for active voluntary euthanasia to take place, all these steps must be met in order for the process to move along. Brock and Callahan offer valid reasons to not accept active voluntary euthanasia, yet, both of their reasoning can be

Open Document