Patricians Vs Plebeians Essay

653 Words3 Pages

Plebeians has an important role in the military team in Rome, therefore they Played an active part in the war. Basically, Patricians and Plebeians are two different classes in ancient Rome, and it exists the difference in wealth, Patricians are wealthy, but Plebeians are poor. It invites Plebeians seek for the salary opportunity for their life in wars, this tendency exists in this era yet.

They were two different types of class in ancient Rome, but they are separated in the country. According to Morey, W. C. (1901), "The patricians and plebeians had united in their efforts to drive out the kings; but when the struggle against the kingship was ended, the chief fruits of the victory fell to the patricians.The plebeians could, it is true, still vote in …show more content…

According to Avary, J. S.(2012), "Meanwhile, in 2011, world military budgets reached a total of $2,157,172,000,000 dollars (i.e. 2.157 million million dollars). This amount of money is almost too large to be imagined. The fact that it is being spent means that many people are making a living from the institution of war. Wealthy and powerful lobbies from the military-industrial complex are able to influence mass media and governments". In agreement with this sentences, it is reasonable Plebeians wait for the war. In that era, it must be more harder to turn out the social class, because there didn't the concept of education, opportunity, but the history and tradition means everything: Patricians are rich class and Plebeians are poor. According to Wikipedia, "This was an effective strategy in the Conflict of the Orders due to strength in numbers; plebeian citizens made up the vast majority of Rome's populace and produced most of its food and resources, while a patrician citizen was a member of the minority upper class, the equivalent of the landed gentry of later times", therefore for the Patrician cause the war, they should treat the Plebeian group for the