ipl-logo

Patriot Act Definition

488 Words2 Pages

The Patriot Act is an antiterrorism law that allocates powers to the U.S. Department of Justice, the National Security Agency, and other federal agencies. The law authorizes roving wiretaps, “sneak and peek” warrants, business record searches, and surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist-related activities not linked to terrorist groups. This authorization is in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which says that “the people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects from unreasonable searches and seizures, and that that security can only be violated by a search warrant issued by a neutral judge and based upon probable cause of crime.”
The role of definition in legislation starts with …show more content…

1182(a)(3)). The modification expands the reasons for deportation and inadmissibility for alleged support of terrorist causes by re-defining terms/categories. It redefines the categorizations of “engaging in terrorist activity” (F)(iv) and “representing a terrorist organization,” and adds “espousing terrorist activity, being the spouse or child of an inadmissible alien (VII), associating with a terrorist organization, and intending to engage in activities that could endanger the welfare, safety or security of the United States” (2)(F). The last phrase “…engage in activities that could endanger the welfare, safety or security of the United States” is an argumentative definition that advances the belief of safety most Americans value, and strokes the fires of our …show more content…

The section expands the definition to include “a violent, criminal act intended to affect the conduct of government by mass destruction” (1)(B)(iii). The section also defines domestic terrorism as “any act that is “dangerous to human life, involves a violation of any state or federal law intended to influence government policy, or coerce a civilian population” (5)(B)(i)(ii). A problem with the definition of domestic terrorism is that the term is broad in scope, and could encompass non-terror activist organizations (e.g., Greenspace, Operation Rescue, etc.), and subject them to being

Show More
Related
150 Words | 1 Pages

The Fourth Amendment makes people in American feel safe and secure. David Sirota author of “Does the government actually understand the 4th Amendment?” says,"a few years after it aired the director of national Intelligence admitted illegal surveillance was still taking place"(understand). " the Government’s unverified assertion that it has halted “systemic” illegal/unconstitutional surveillance by the National Security Administration." says David Sirota author of “Does the government actually understand the 4th Amendment?”(Understand). Sirota also states "The NSA is admitting that even with an outdated 1997 supreme court ruling it knows it cannot post mass collect metadata with no warrants whatsoever.

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

The second amendment of the Bill of Rights stipulates that the United States shall have a well-regulated militia. Reasoning for this is that as a free state, a well-regulated militia is necessary for the security amongst the citizens. The second amendment also provides that the people have the right to keep and bear arms. It is expressly specified that the latter right shall not be infringed.

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

One group that argues this is the American Civil Liberties Union, which strongly disagrees with the Patriot Act. They have stated that investigations into the Patriot Act, “reveal thousands of violations of law,” (ACLU), while this is simply not true. One controversial piece of the Patriot Act are roving wiretaps. These allow government investigators to follow and put surveillance on certain people, rather than certain devices, so that they may save time and effort. According to Nathan Sales, a law professor at George Mason University, “Federal courts agree that Title III’s roving wiretaps authority is constitutional and… provides strong support for constitutionality,” (Sales).

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

I also lay out important realities of the law, including how it is being used, and examine whether the intrusions it imposes on American citizens are reasonable. I also discuss the backlash against the law. I conclude with a discussion on the likely future of the law and implications of the law for the criminal justice discipline. The main purpose of the paper is to thoroughly summarize and critically analyze the USA PATRIOT Act, for the benefit of those working in the discipline of criminal justice – who have, as of the current day largely ignored the law. The USA PATRIOT Act stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

The Alien and Sedition Acts that were designed and passed by Congress in 1798 established a range of restrictions on the society. Among those laws, the Naturalization Act made the process of gaining American citizenship longer and the Sedition Act was designed to forbid publishing the materials against the government. While those documents “were in conflict with the Bill of Rights”, the Congress considered them appropriate (Roark 281). The positions of people within the society regarding these laws differed. From the point of view of a recent immigrant, these laws were inappropriate for the American democratic society.

Read More
106 Words | 1 Pages

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Consitution is the part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. The common misconception is that it simply covers what it states. In the age of development and new technology, it is likely that what we consider secrets or personal information is not as secret or personal as we once believed. Important pieces of evidence or information have often been found through illegal means, and this has led to many cases that change the way the constitution and the Fourth Amendment affect

Read More
1670 Words | 7 Pages

The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2022, has a few components to it but the mainly parts in regards to domestic terrorism would be that the bill establishes new requirements to expand the availability of information that can monitor, analyze, investigate, and prosecute domestic terrorist acts (H.R.350 - Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2022 117th ... - congress). The act would also require the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) to jointly report on domestic terrorism related incidents or attempts (H.R.350 - Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2022 117th ... - congress). While this is a more recent policy to be proposed, it does show that the policies that fail do not always have to be from the past. There were a few reasons for this policy not being successful. In comparison to the USA PATRIOT Act, which was rapidly enacted due to the events of September 11, 2001, the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2022 had more time to be looked over and analyzed, there were not any events that had occurred to push the bill into law.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

The Patriot Act is a controversial government policy that directly goes against the 4th amendment and violates our right to privacy; this is clearly unconstitutional. This policy has continued to spark debates about privacy and government overreach in this Age of Intelligence. The Patriot Act was initially created after the events of 9/11/2001 when two planes hit the World Trade Center in New York. In response to this event, the United States government created the 'Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism', commonly known as the Patriot Act.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Thurgood Marshall was one of the most important and well-known men in Civil Rights history. He played a vital role in fighting for civil rights and he made many impacts on the American Civil rights movement. His accomplishments includes, guiding the litigation that destroyed the legal underpinning of Jim Crow segregation. He is also the first black Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. He also dedicated his life to end the crucial racial discrimination of the country.

Read More
140 Words | 1 Pages

The patriot act has in my opion violated the 4th amendment. It has its advantages as far as terrorizim but to normal citzens this is a complete violation of our privacy. bThe late Benjermin Franklin warned us about trading our liberty for sucureity. This act has taken away a lot of our liberties it gives the government way too much power to invade our privacy. They now have unprecedented power to monitor the phone calls, e-mails, without a warrant.

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

On September 11th, 2001, tragedy struck America. A terrorist attack was carried out resulting in 2,753 Americans killed. America became locked in a war, and it needed more security on its own soil. So, congress passed a law known as the Patriot Act. This allowed the N.S.A (national security agency) to gain information of individual citizens or groups of individuals by using library records, phone calls and other surveillance.

Read More
168 Words | 1 Pages

“The Patriot Act broadly undermines the rights of all Americans. It reduces judicial oversight of a host of investigative measures, including wiretaps, expands the government 's ability to track individuals ' Internet use and gives federal officials expansive new powers that are in no way limited to investigating terrorist crimes. ( thenation) It authorizes an end run around the Fourth Amendment by allowing the government to conduct wiretaps and searches in criminal investigations, without probable cause of a crime, as long as the government claims that it also seeks to gather foreign intelligence--an authority that is particularly questionable in light of recent disclosures from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the FBI has

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

“The NSA is not listening to Americans ' phone calls or monitoring their emails” (Does the Government). As the government states they are permitted to collect any Americans communications The Fourth Amendment protects your privacy, for instance the police cannot search personal properties. Due to the definition of "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,” it makes people feel secure (Legal Information). In addition, it prevents all irrelevant searches that are not useful.

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

Serial killers exist in our midst. When a serial killer commits an act, the media disseminates information, and one of the critical inquiries is the motive behind the serial killer committing the act. As a result of numerous socioeconomic causes, crime has only gone up, presumably due to the recent Covid-19 Pandemic. Crime has received much attention in the media. Over the years, humanity is becoming more interested in the factors that motivate these serial killers, even though society is developing these serial killers.

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

The expression “terrorism” appears very scarcely in a number of Commonwealth statutes. National Security and Organised Crime are two subsections one would think terrorism consists of. While terrorism is rarely used within Commonwealth statutes, national security it used quite often. The expression “national security” again is used in a wider variety of statutory contexts. It is used to describe the purposes for which assistance must be provided

Read More

More about Patriot Act Definition

Related Topics

Open Document