ipl-logo

Peaceful Resistance To Civil Disobedience

501 Words3 Pages

Peaceful resistance with civil disobedience has played a huge role in shaping a free society throughout our history, and not just our history as Americans either. There has been many successful peaceful resistance throughout world history. Many forms of this such as, marches,parades,sit-ins,protests,boycotting and even speeches, have positively impacted or changed a free society. I can't talk about civil disobedience or peaceful resistance without talking about one of the most famous civil disobedience leaders, Martin Luther King Jr., from 1954-1968 the civil rights movement was in effect in the United States. Martin Luther King was a major person during this time. With violence and anger spreading throughout the towns and cities Dr.King knew the right strategy to get positive recognition. For example, Martin Luther Kings sit-in movement sparked national interest to push for civil rights. In 1955 he was recruited to as a spokesman for the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a campaign held by the African American community. The campaign was to force integration on the city buses in Montgomery, Alabama. After 381 …show more content…

After World War 1 when Britain didn't grant India their independence,Gandhi called for a strike with peaceful civil disobedience. A term he adopted while in jail after reading an essay written by Henry David Thoreau. His boldest act of civil disobedience was on March 12, 1930, when him and his followers marched across the sea to protest the British monopoly on salt. Soon all of India was protesting, and on August of 1931, during a meeting, British leaders acknowledge him as a powerful force they couldn't suppress. With his peaceful strategy Mohandas Gandhi freed the entire country of

Show More
Related
533 Words | 3 Pages

When it comes to America's History you can clearly see how peaceful protest has brought this world to what it is today. If it wasn't for people such as Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks who voiced their opinions in a nonviolent manner, it's possible that our world would not have reached this equivalent state. While it is true that peaceful resistance has positively affected our society for centuries, these brave people have faced the consequences. For example, King was arrested after one of his nonviolent protests and sent to Birmingham Jail. While there he wrote the now famous piece "A Letter From Birmingham Jail".

Read More
2124 Words | 9 Pages

India’s leader Mohandas Gandhi (Mahatma Gandhi) was influenced by David Thoreau 's Civil Disobedience arguments while sitting in jail. Gandhi loosely adopted the term “civil disobedience” for non-violent protests and refused to cooperate with injustice. Following his release, he protested the registration law by joining labor strikes and organizing a large non-violent march. After the marches, the Boer government finally agreed to end the most divisive sections of the law. In 1907, he campaigned in South Africa and wrote a translated synopsis of Thoreau 's argument for the Indian Opinion.

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. "-Socrates. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because the society is not free unless it's able to check the government. As long as the protest of the law remains peaceful it is a good thing. It is the public telling the government that they will not let them gain to much power and crush their human rights.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because it helps get people's points across, without breaking any rules. People are allowed to voice there opinion, without causing any physical harm to themselves, or anyone around them. Many equal right came about during peaceful resistances. Thomas Jefferson is an example of that. He led a revolution, and changed the lives of millions of African Americans, then and now.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

As Oscar Wilde said, “ It is through disobedience that progress has been made-- disobedience and rebellion.” Disobedience during the American Revolution was originally peaceful, but as grievances grew and British rule became harsher, Americans could no longer sit idly by. Radical disobedience to the law was necessary in order to promote change for American society. During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s, a drastic nonviolent movement was necessary to counteract the expectation of violence, reiterating to Americans that peaceful resistance to laws can positively affect a free society. The Civil Rights movement was split by two factions: one was a violent resistance named The Black Panthers and the other was a nonviolent protest led by Martin Luther King Jr.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Peaceful resistance to laws does positively impact a free society. In American society, citizens are proud of the fact that they have the freedom to speak their minds and protest without violence or fear of persecution. Throughout our history, there have been a number of people who have peacefully protested and changed the nation for the better. There have also been people who have spoken up about certain situations and have not been able to change the unjust law or situation.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

Consequently, those protesting an issue must work to bring about change earnestly through truly believing in their cause. Henry David Thoreau shared this sentiment in his “Civil Disobedience”, writing that one person who maintains their beliefs can change the world “For it matters not how small the beginning may seem to be: what is once done well is done forever.” Though while not all peaceful protests are successful enough to inspire true change, many of today’s free societies were inspired by those that did. Mohandas K. Gandhi was able to coerce the South African Boer government to “end the most objectionable parts of the registration law” and convince the British to grant India its independence from Britain”(Gandhi and Civil DIsobedience”). Therefore, it only takes one individual to inspire a change in the world because “Without their courage those injustices would never have received the attention required to compel national action” (“Civil Discourse and Petitioning”).

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

People's justification to engage in civil disobedience rests on the unresponsiveness that their engagement to oppose an unjust law receives. People who yearn for a change in a policy might sometimes find themselves in a dead end because their “attempts to have the laws repealed have been ignored and legal protests and demonstrations have had no success” (Rawls 373). What Rawls says is that civil disobedience is a last option to oppose an unjust law; therefore, providing civil disobedients with a justification for their cause. Civil disobedience is the spark of light that people encountered at the dead end and they hope that this spark of light will illuminate to show that an unjust law should not exist at all. Martin Luther King, Jr, in his “Letter from

Read More
322 Words | 2 Pages

When King was 15 years old, Morehouse College (the same that his father and grandfather had attended) offered opportunities for anyone to join if they passed the entrance exam. King passed it, and so he became a freshman in college. He didn’t really know what he was working towards at first; he lost interest in becoming a preacher because the way his father preached brought displays of emotion that made King feel uncomfortable. He felt like it robbed religion’s dignity when people shouted “Amen!” or “Hallelujah!” throughout the service.

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

King also played a crucial role in the Montgomery bus boycott, a year-long campaign of civil disobedience in which African Americans refused to pay for bus transportation in protest of discriminatory practices. This boycott resulted in significant financial losses for the bus companies and marked the first large-scale anti-segregation protest in the United States. Dr. King, who held a degree in theology, was also the first African American to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, awarded to him in 1964. Prior to his rise as one of the most influential figures of the 20th century, he served as a Baptist minister at a church in Montgomery,

Read More
304 Words | 2 Pages

All of these people are practicing what they think is civil disobedience differently and for different purposes therefore they cannot be a port of the same group. On page 56 it says that civil disobedients are “organized minorities, bound together by common opinion, rather than by common interest.” These five people do not share a common opinion, they all just want the war to stop for different reasons. Each one of these people is wanting the war to stop for their own self-interest. For example, Mary is against the war because her taxes are being raised and Tom is against the war because it has been going on for too long, and there is no chance to win.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

I believe peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. As citizens of the United States, we are born with certain natural rights. According to John Locke, an eighteenth century philosopher, natural rights are not bestowed by the government, but inherited by birth by virtue of the fact that we are human beings. These natural rights include life, liberty, and property. He theorized that the purpose of government was to protect those rights; and if it did not, it would lose its legitimacy and need not be obeyed.

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi would boycott the British and then others would follow him so that would make the British lose a lot of money. Mahatma Gandhi would even go to the extent of making his own clothing. I feel like this takes so much dedication and time but all ended up to be worth it. Civil disobedience is also known as passive resistance which is an act of nonviolent protest against the government. Mahatma Gandhi was one of the leaders to us civil disobedience against the government.

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

Gandhi Broke The Salt Law on April 6, 1930, it sparked large as a civil disobedience against The British Raj, Salt laws, over 8000 people were jailed for supporting Gandhi 's beliefs about non violence. The reason I assume this act shows how Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of the citizen because Gandhi did what he thought was right not only for himself but for others and made a stand for the people of India and broke the law to be heard and now the country of Indian has their Independence because of his actions. Additionally this provides Moral Responsibility since Gandhi thought that Marching with the Indian people his actions would not only be the best for him but for his

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

Peaceful Resistance no matter what way you look at it, it 's still going against someone whether it involves words or actions, resistance still causes more conflict. The last 5 years we have had people say they want change through these “peaceful protest” but these peaceful protests have done nothing but turn to violent riots were theirs damage to vehicles, business families rely on destroyed, bystanders hurt, officers killed and our country torn apart. Back when Martian Luther King Jr was around and he had his Peaceful Resistance or rallies for equality, they were peaceful and brought our country together with something that needed to be changed, but the protest we’ve had the last 5 years… he would be ashamed of. Peaceful Resistance to laws does negatively impact our free society in America. First going along with what I said about there being “peaceful rallies” even though some people may be at these rallies to make a difference to support their opinion, not everyone can respect that.

Read More

More about Peaceful Resistance To Civil Disobedience

Related Topics

Open Document