Peloponnesian War Essay

Introduction

Domination of the land for a sea power is just as important as domination of the sea for a land power. Amongst both types, there is a common goal of being prevailing, superior and declared a winner. There are quite a few ways to become the dominator but the common one to be discussed is the one that uses the theory of war. War is, “A state or period of fighting between countries or groups; a situation in which people or groups compete with or fight against each other; an organized effort by a government or other large organization to stop or defeat something that is viewed as dangerous or bad.”

For a sea power to defeat a land power there has to be a strategy implemented. The strategy must involve a net assessment and the

As discussed in the Russo-Japanese War case studies, some strategies are ignored or underestimated while some are implemented despite the known and unknown risks in stake. Furthermore, one doesn’t automatically decide to agree to disagree over a dispute. As in the case studies of Athens and Sparta of the Peloponnesian War; the two countries fought for at 27 years before the cessation of war. It is argued that the point of the war was forgotten after the leaders

They were still overcoming the humiliation of being forced by Russia to give back its winnings gained from defeating China in the Sino-Japanese War. At the time, Russia was already a well-known super power and Japan was still rising. Japan understood and respected this but still attempted to diplomatically reach an agreement with Russia to accept boundaries suitable to limit or even rid any conflict between the two of them. For instance, Japan allowed Russia to have superiority over Manchuria if they, the Russians, just stayed out of Korea. Russia played a total disregard to Japan’s recommendations; therefore, Japan had to begin planning for war and that is when the scientific method came into