ipl-logo

People Seed Case Study

464 Words2 Pages

The people seeds case: You desire to open a window in your house knowing that there are these seeds similar to pollen that could enter your house, take root in your living room and use your house for the duration of the growing period. Understanding the consequences you go out and buy a metal screen, the very best protection, in order to best prevent a people seed from entering your house. After opening the window and installing the screen a people seed still manages to enter and take root.

People seeds argument:
If a fetus has the right to the use of your body just because you willingly engaged in an activity knowing that it could result in a pregnancy, then the people seed has the right to the use of your house just because you willingly …show more content…

Stating that knowing the possible repercussions of opening the window is sufficient enough in making the individual responsible for the people seed, and so, giving the people seed the right to your home. In other words, opening the window was consent enough to giving the people seed that right. I don’t believe this to be sufficient in undermining the argument. The case of Bill and Ted does well in distinguishing two terms of consent and concludes that an individual must tacitly agree to the consequences in order to have consent for the action. The most relatable case in disagreeing with any objection to the second premise is the hunter case. In the hunter case, Boonin thinks there are two ways an individual can be responsible for an action. The first being that the individual would continue to exist but, because of your action is now in need of your assistance, the other being that the individual would not have existed in the first place and now needs your assistance. In terms of being analogous to the people seed argument, the individual doesn’t make the people seed worse off than the people seed otherwise would have been had the individual not occurred. Therefore the individual is not morally responsible for the people seed and thus the people seed has no moral right to the

Show More
Related

The Pros And Cons Of Roe V. Wade

844 Words | 4 Pages

Wade, Ely similarly disavows Roe v. Wade for a manufactured sentence. He first critiques how the Supreme Court disregarded the sense of “persons” in the Fourteenth Amendment and its application to corporations, but not the unborn. He proceeds to argue that fetuses’ constitutional rights are irrelevant from restricting abortion because states can force people to refrain from activities regardless of their constitutional protections. For example, he states that dogs are not people, but the state can prevent killing them. In addition, the Court provides no evidence of the framers’ intent or states why privacy is even involved.

Read More

Norma Mccorvey Lawsuit Against The State Of Texas

982 Words | 4 Pages

From this decision, the United States Supreme Court declared that having an abortion was far safer than a natural child birth. In that court room, it was also determined that the word “person” did not include an unborn fetus (Kaplan). The country was completely divided on the Roe v. Wade decisions. Many American’s were angered by the fact that the United States no longer legally considered an unborn fetus to be a person. However, it was a huge relief for many young women across the country.

Read More

Lee And George Abortion Analysis

273 Words | 2 Pages

Patrick Lee and Robert George assert that abortion is objectively immoral. One of Lee and George’s main reason for coming to this conclusion is that human embryos are living human beings. This essentially validates that abortion is indeed the process of killing a human. Another main point said by the two is a rebuttal to a common argument used in favor of abortion, which states that a potential mother has full parental responsibilities only if she has voluntarily assumed them. The rebuttal to this was that the potential mother does indeed have special responsibilities to raise the child.

Read More

Analysis Of Judith Thomson's A Defense Of Abortion

1079 Words | 5 Pages

This same way of thinking means that a fetus has no choice or ability to make decision when it comes to whose womb they inhabit as a result of failed contraception. Again, I am not arguing that abortion would not be morally permissible in the case of failed contraception but I am saying that there are key differences in intent and rational capacities between a malicious burglar and an unknowing fetus that weaken this analogy. Thomson also says that a burglar who breaks in should not have a right to stay in your house. While this is true, there are very few cases where a burglar will stay in your house if there intent is to steal something and get away. Staying in the house would be irrational if they want to get away with the crime.

Read More

Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion Judith Thomson

1070 Words | 5 Pages

I formulated this decision comparing my stance on why having consensual sex should result in permission of the fetus to use a woman’s body. Consensual sex isn’t a necessary act of survival like walking outside would be. Consensual sex is merely based off on wanting to experience a form of pleasure. The need for this pleasure is a weak justification to deny usage of another body when the fetus requires it. In other words, you can completely cut consensual sex out of your life with ease, and avoid the controversy over allowing permission for a fetus to grow.

Read More

Roe V. Wade Argumentative Analysis

2168 Words | 9 Pages

Another argument pro-lifes bring is that, because a fetus has the potential to become a person, it is not fair to get rid of it because we are not giving the fetus the chance to grow to become someone in life, and everyone deserves to have a chance at life.

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Roe V. Wade

1567 Words | 7 Pages

But in nearly all the instances the use of the word is such that it has application only to postnatally.” The developing fetus cannot maintain the same right to property as the pregnant women. In order for the court to take control of a women’s body they have to prove that they have a significant state interest in protecting the property of the developing fetus, but the fetus has no defined rights under the Constitution. Furthermore, if the court denies women the right to have an abortion they are effectively depriving her of her right to property which would set a dangerous precedent. If the government can decide to make a woman retain her pregnancy, then they can effectively control other aspects of her

Read More

Examples Of Founding Fathers

1171 Words | 5 Pages

If Jefferson did not view everyone as equal then the weak, the baby, could have its right taken away easily (Brown para. 7). Jefferson once said “The first duty of government is the protection of life, not its destruction. The chief purpose of government is to protect life. Abandon that and you have abandoned all” (Brown para. 14). The baby is a person; therefore, the mother is technically destroying the baby’s rights.

Read More

Mary Anne Warren's Rights Of Abortion

794 Words | 4 Pages

As humans, we are given different rights that are meant to provide us with a chance at a good life. However, these rights can become compromised when it comes to conflicts between a pregnant woman and her fetus. The right of the fetus to live is seen as inferior to the right of the mother to have an abortion. Although each of the rights is different, it is not appropriate to say that one citizen’s rights are more superior than another citizen’s rights.

Read More

Abortion Satire

196 Words | 1 Pages

It is that woman’s individual right to do whatever she wants with her body. To put a woman through even more years of pain just because she's pregnant makes you selfish because you don't know what got them in that situation in the first place. Women don’t deserve to be put down because of the choices they make. I don't think the issue here is abortion, i think it's

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of PGD

197 Words | 1 Pages

As I have stated, PGD is a highly controversial topic, which means that there are many different viewpoints regarding whether PGD is ethically correct, whether it should be used and whether it is used for the correct reasons. These different viewpoints are decided for varying reasons. John F. Kilner, president of the Centre of Bioethics and Human Dignity, believes that PGD is unethical as it involves creating embryos and knowing that some will be eliminated as they do not fit the “PGD selection criteria.” Kilner wants to either find a way to completely prevent genetic illnesses or treat them. He argues that life begins at the embryonic state.

Read More

Is Utilitarianism Is Valid

169 Words | 1 Pages

The child action of killing the intruder end up saving the lives of his or her family who would otherwise perish potentially, if they would have not done anything as a result. Supporting with the Utilitarianism that, actions should be done with the explanation of achieving the greatest utility

Read More

Who Is To Blame In The Book Of Genesis

1739 Words | 7 Pages

One article that I came across brought up a point I wouldn’t thought of myself, but it makes a great point for the argument. “The fruit of the forbidden tree grants humanity the knowledge of right and wrong. That means before they ate from the tree, they did not know what was right and what was wrong. So if there was anything wrong about eating the fruit, then all the fault should fall on the creator, not the beings that don’t understand right or wrong yet (Marck).” Only after eating from the tree would they know that what they have done is something bad.

Read More

Against Unlimited Procreative Freedom Case Study

1068 Words | 5 Pages

Given that both reproductive and non-reproductive rights should be equated, my argument is as follows: (I) If certain aspects of humanity are universally inalienable such as bodily integrity, then it is morally impermissible to fail in upholding this right as it pertains to present and future autonomous persons (II) Certain

Read More

Persuasive Essay Against Abortion

1085 Words | 5 Pages

(Tanner) Pro-choice defenders also say that it is the woman 's right to choose to have the baby or not, forgetting the baby 's rights. The life of a human being begins at the moment of conception, and it is not the fetus´s fault if the mother wasn 't ready to have a baby or if the situation in which baby was conceived wasn 't ideal. For example, if the baby is conceived by rape, the baby should not pay the consequences of other people, he or she has not done anything wrong .”Compassion for the mothers is extremely important, but it is never

Read More

More about People Seed Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document