Perseverance In Alan Moore's Watchmen

1144 Words5 Pages

Would you sacrifice half of the population in order to maximize long term societal welfare? These are the questions raised throughout Alan Moore’s Watchmen, as the clash between deontological and utilitarian stances are debated. Although a profound question, it is inherently rhetorical. Regardless of how one answers that question, the novel’s aim is to convey a strong sense of perseverance through the support of your individual perspective. The novel uses Rorschach and Ozymandias, two imperative main characters, to represent differing philosophical views. The author compares their similarities through perseverance and confidence in their beliefs, however still exposes how truly different they really are in regards to their own personal views …show more content…

Moore shows that no matter how many different opinions, people can still coexist. First and foremost Rorschach uses clear views of deontology throughout the book. Whilst still persevering his own beliefs, Rorschach shows his deontological view when he opposes Veidt’s plan to protect the greater good, “Of course. Must protect Veidt’s new utopia. One more body amongst foundations makes little difference. Well? What are you waiting for? Do it. DO IT!” (Moore 406). Not only does Rorschach choose death rather than giving up his viewpoint, he openly opposes Veidt’s plan of killing 50% of New York in order to save the Earth. Moore shows his own beliefs too by incorporating the importance of challenging philosophy into the story. Overwhelmingly, Moore shows how important it is to take a stance, and takes advantage of characters like Rorschach to show how one should let philosophy guide their opinion on certain stances. Deontology is the theory that no one shall ever do anything wrong, and everyone shall act morally. While some may argue that Rorschach cannot be considered a deontologist due to his vigilantism and occasional use of violence, they fail to recognize that Rorschach’s actions align with a broader deontological framework. Rorschach should be considered a deontologist since he only acts in ways that promote the better welfare of all of