ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

626 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Positive outcomes of animal testing

Open heart surgery saves about 440,000 lives every year in the U.S. Because of tests on animals, this procedure is possible. Animal testing can help make huge discoveries in medicine and the human body that will save people's lives. There are many different diseases and health issues that animal testing has benefitted in some way. Not only that, but there has also been many developments of vaccines that help infectious diseases which is possible because of animal testing. Lastly, animals are not morally equal to humans, so animal testing is OK. Animal-rights activists believe that animals should be treated equally as humans, and that animal testing is not good. However, animal-rights propaganda is often bombastic or inaccurate. These outlandish claims are untrue. The opposition also says that animal testing is not essential to discoveries. Joseph Lister, a British surgeon, said that “animal experiments had been essential to his own work… and that to restrict research with animals would prevent discoveries” (Botting, Morrison 1). Animal testing has been essential for a long time and will continue to be that way. Therefore, animal testing can help make discoveries that will overall help mankind. …show more content…

The British surgeon Joseph Lister started to “use...carbolic acid to sterilize surgical instruments, sutures and wound dressings” (Botting, Morrison 1). Sterilizing those things will climatically prevent infectious diseases. Lister was inspired to do this by a chemist work on animal testing. “UCLA scientists pioneered deep brain stimulation, a surgical procedure used to treat… most commonly the debilitating symptoms of Parkinson's disease” which was all made possible by animal research (Office of Medical Relations 2). Obviously, animal testing ha help immensely with surgeries, and it also helps with

Show More
Related
860 Words | 4 Pages

Opponents of animal testing say that it is inhumane and barbaric. Personally, reasonable experiments on animal testing that are for the benefit of mankind, are morally acceptable. Any acts of animal testing that help humans survive and grow

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Why Animal Testing is Wrong The human race has greatly benefitted through the use of animals. They have not only been a great form of companionship for people, but have also helped with the success in the world of medicine. For many years, the rights of animals and animal experimentation have been up for debate on whether or not it should be legal. Some may find that animal testing has led to major advancements in the medical world and that it is a small price to pay to save millions of lives, but others believe it is inhumane and that animals should be given the same rights as humans.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

Those who argue that animal experimentation is necessary claim that treatments for diseases like polio, diabetes, hepatitis B, several types of cancer, malaria, and tuberculosis wouldn’t have been formulated without the use of animal research. They also claim that the complexities of the human organ system cannot be replicated to the fullest extent

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing has historical roots dating back to 384 BC as Greek physician-scientists used animals to make further advancements in the medical fields. During this time, techniques for “vivisections” were performed in which live animals were surgically dissected for intellectual benefits (Franco). Well-respected individuals like Aristotle, Erasistratus, and Galen conducted experiments on animals to better understand the “anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology” of humans (Hajar). Such experiments benefited the scientific community and allowed scientific researchers to apply their knowledge to human patients (Hajar). Periods like the Renaissance and the 17th century were marked with an abundance of animal testing and experimentation

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Animals have been given minimal protection under welfare laws, but have been denied access to fundamental rights. Animal testing practices can be dated back to over four hundred years ago. “Over eighteen million animals are used in research and experimentation in the United States” (Lubinski), and these animals are only allowed access to basic rights such to husbandry which is housing, feeding,

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

Then again, medical examinations involving animal testing have greatly improved the health being of humans. Surgical methods and medications nowadays would not be discovered if it was not for the understanding of the diseases and how the body works. This can be approached by using animal testing. Animal experimentation has contributed to the abundance of medication we now have in the palm of our hands. For instance, we have treatments for asthma, high blood pressure, and diabetes which were all discovered using animal testing.

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

After reading so many stories about the negative side of animal testing, then is there any positive affect about animal testing? The answer is yes, according to the article “Animal research is a source of human compassion, not shame” posted by Lancent. It points out the idea of the use of animals in medical research has save many people’s life. Without animal testing, there will be much less medical improvement than what we have right now, and there will be no new drugs for new or hard-to-treat diseases (815.

Read More
1523 Words | 7 Pages

Even though some people argument that it is not necessary, without animal testing thousands of millions of people would now be dead. Thanks to animal research we know about the effects of certain medicines in the human body, thanks to animal testing we have discovered the cure for diseases that killed people and made them and their families suffer. Animals also benefit from the testing since most human diseases also affect animals; some of the medicines

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not ok for so many reasons. The first I have to say is about the hardship and pain to the animals. Animals feel pain along with humans, so why do we test on them? What if a bunch of giant animals took you from your natural home, nearly starved you, then tested on you with weird equipment in someplace strange? Yeah, pretty awful.

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

The first reson animal testing should be continued is so we can make new cures shore new medicines are safe. Without animal testing some medicines would have harmed humans. Animal testing is a much safer way to test these medicines before they reach humans. Animal testing has also led to some breakthroughs in medical science. Animal testing is also helping with finding some cures to Cancer and Alzheimer 's. Smith said “if animal research were prohibited, scientific advances would be hopelessly stymied” (smith).

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

We have to be the voice that will be heard. We have to be the advocates they never had. Animal testing is not only wrong for morals but humanly wrong. Yes we get advantages, but what price does that come with? Are we going to go as far as putting animal in extinction for our own benefit.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Since animal testing is cruel, inhumane, and alternative testing methods now exist, we should discontinue animal testing once and for all. For these reasons, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of human products. To begin with, animal testing is cruel, inhumane and it violates animals’ rights. The USDA reported that in 2016, 71,370 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia at all for relief.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Many people have different ideas on animal testing and if it is or is not appropriate for medical research. Many disagree, but there are some that think it’s necessary for testing to be done. Animal testing is necessary because it helps develop life saving medical treatments for not only humans, but animals, and it helps determine how medicine will react to the human body. Animal testing is appropriate for medical research because testing helps develop life saving medical treatments for humans. Without testing, scientist wouldn’t have found ways to help people with breast cancer or childhood Leukemia.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document