ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Capital Punishment

786 Words4 Pages

According to Olivia Casino, 4.1% of people on death row are innocent. The issue of the death penalty is not something to be taken lightly. We have been executing people since we have been a country. In some of those executions innocent people are dying. The death penalty is also always changing because they are trying to find a more humane way to kill people, but there is no humane way to kill people. The death penalty needs to stop because innocent people are dying, it does not make sense to kill killers as a punishment for killing because killing is bad, and that life in prison is a worse punishment than death to some people.
According to Olivia Casino, an untold number of innocent people have died from false information that has put them on death row. In an article from Pantagraph Olivia Casino says that 1.6 percent of people on death row have been exonerated, but if the innocence rate is 4.1 percent, that is more than twice the rate of exonerations. People on death row should not be executed …show more content…

When we kill somebody on death row it is because they have done something very bad. We call this capital punishment. To receive capital punishment you have to commit an unthinkable crime, in most cases this includes murder. What we are doing with capital punishment is killing people as a punishment for killing somebody else. This all revolves around the fact that killing is bad, and what Ben Urmston is talking about is that we are punishing people by killing them because they killed someone and killing is wrong. Essentially, we are killing killers as a punishment because killing is very wrong. This is very ironic an counterintuitive. Therefore, our federal government and state governments should not be killing people as a punishment because it is just doing what we are trying to stop the murderers from

Show More
Related
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many

Read More
2229 Words | 9 Pages

The death penalty sends a message to citizens; a message that says murder is not outrageous, unless the state is doing it as a sanction. This message helps to justify civilian killings of people believed to be deserving of death and may possibly even cause an uprise in vigilante style murders. This message also leaves an almost open air on what is wrong and provides no consistent moral ground for society to base their beliefs on. This does not mean that people will suddenly think murder is a favorable deed, but it may cause some to not realize how terrible it is. Joseph Summer wrote this in an article titled “Some Adverse Effects of the Death Penalty in History”: “…people learned 3 lessons from the government’s violent example: to use

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

An argument that has been made many times before, but has a solid point, is that the government is sending the wrong message. With the death penalty in place, it sends the message that it is okay to kill people who have killed other people. With that being said it opens the doors for other citizens to take it into their own hands. If it is alright for the government to kill murderers, they can use this reasoning to justify killing that person because they want

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

Unfortunately, our justice system is not always accurate and faulty cases slip through the cracks. Families of innocent people should not be made to suffer for the inadequacy of the death penalty. Capital punishment poses a large risk to innocent people and their families.courts can sentence murderers to life without parole, why not get rid of the death penalty? The death penalty is the most horrible punishment of execution that the united state of america has allowed. It seems that our government is being hypocritical when it states that capital punishment is allowable because, after all, the criminal did murder an innocent victim, and therefore should be killed.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Back in 1796 there were more than 10 innocent people killed and today about 4.1 percent of the people executed are innocent, and that’s more than enough. I think it is un fair to families, friends and the defendant to have their life taken if they are not guilty, If the law officials cannot prove whether or not the defendant is guilty then the death penalty should be abolished. Now on the other side, executing someone who is actually guilty; I do not support this either. I strongly believe that someone who commits a capital crime and has received the death penalty deserves to suffer for the rest of their life. Democratic leaders will be the ones to change the death penalty.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

“‘Death sentences represent less than one-tenth of 1% of prison sentences in the United States…,’” (Von Drehle, 9). Furthermore, death row is just a small fraction of the criminal justice system and can not be based on that alone. For instance, what many don't take into account is the justice systems allows for many states, such as the populous state of New York, to ban the death penalty. (state laws, p1)

Read More
1332 Words | 6 Pages

and I really do not know what my stance is. Both sides have good points, and on one hand I believe it is immoral and does not serve any justice especially if someone is falsely convicted, but for some crimes I believe if guilty it isn’t that horrible of a punishment. On the topic of false conviction and how many people on death row tend to be innocent, the the article “Justice Is Not Served with the Death Penalty” by Raymond Lesniak explains it well, stating that “Since 1973, 130 human beings on death rows throughout the United States have been released from jail for being wrongfully convicted. During that time, over 1,100 prisoners were executed. How many of them were innocent?

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many controversies on the topic of capital punishment and its role within society. It is not likely that there will ever be a unified view on this topic. One of the first reasons why the death penalty should never be imposed is because of the possibility of killing an innocent person. True enough the DNA technology has decreased this probability but due to administrative bias innocent people can still be killed. There is no retribution for a dead man who was wrongly put to death.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Although the death penalty may bring some closure to families of the victims and even the victims themselves it still should be abolished because the negatives outweigh the positives. People could be murdered by the state even if they are innocent. They are taking away any chance these people have at a normal life even though it's a life that they deserve and did nothing to have it taken away. 6. Conclusion

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

Daniele Manville was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to 4 ½ to 15 years incarceration. Daniele had decided at a very young age he wanted to work in law; he wanted to be a lawyer. In 1972 at a college campus he got into a heated scuffle and killed a guy with chloroform; the heated scuffle was over drugs. When Daniele was released in 1976 and thirteen years later applied to enrol to be a lawyer. When it came to one question ‘Have you ever been convicted of a criminal charge’ he answered appropriately to what he had done.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Death penalty is like the ‘’tooth for a tooth – eye for an eye’’ theory. Instead of acting inhuman to our fellow beings we should find a better way to solve the mind of criminals. Making the problem vanish is not a good idea. We should do psychological researching instead! I, myself have a lot of faith in humanity.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

In the U.S.A alone since 1973 130 innocent people have been sentenced to death(1) and in the last two years evidence has come up that indicates four men previously thought to be guilty may have actually been innocent and put to death(3). The death penalty is supposed to protect innocent people from killers, instead it murders them. And these are the people who have been discovered to be innocent! What about the ones who were not so lucky? A recent example of this is Richard Glossip a man who was sentenced to death based on a corrupt statement with no other evidence to prove him guilty (5).

Read More
1383 Words | 6 Pages

This may not be an overwhelming amount, but we don‘t really know how many innocent lives have really been taken. Now with that being said even if the amount of innocent lives taken is very small that‘s still an awful thing to happen. Is the death pentaly worth the risk of any innocent lives? Or it might be very unlikely that it‘ll happen because according to this same article death penalty cases are taken with extreme caution, and if there is any doubt most of the time the defendent will be senteced to life imprisonment or exonerated „Advocates for a defendant are much more likely to pursue any plausible postconviction claim of innocence if the defendant is under sentence of death. “ "NCIB PMC Barbara O 'Brian, Chen Hu, Edward H.Kennedy, Samuel R. Gross,“ Another concern to think about is, is there really any humane way to perform the death penalty?

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

The Death Penalty, loss of life due to previous crimes and actions, is believed by some to be extremely costly, inhumane, and cruel unlike some others whom believe it is just, right, and provides closure. The Death Penalty is not a quick and easy process. Most who get sentenced to deaths row wait years for their ultimate punishment of death. Some believe that it is not right to punish and kill a human for actions they have done because, they believe that the inmate should have another chance. Then others believe that it is right to punish someone for their actions especially if their actions involve killing another or multiple humans.

Read More
1320 Words | 6 Pages

The major reason why the death penalty should be abolished is that the cost of the death penalty is too much and the USA is in debt to many other countries. What this means is that the death penalty should be abolished and also the cost death penalty is more than the cost of maximum sentence life in prison. According to J. Marceau and H. Whitson, “The Cost of Colorado’s Death penalty,” 3 Univ. of Denver Criminal Law Review “A new study of the cost of the death penalty in Colorado revealed that capital proceedings require six times more days in court and

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Capital Punishment

Related Topics

Open Document