ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Gay Rights

855 Words4 Pages

Bishop Gregory Rickel said , " same sex couples are not asking for treatment, they are asking for equality , they are asking to be accountable , as a couple in community." Same sex marriage are couples that join in a relationship with someone of the same gender. Currently the Supreme Court said that homosexuals have a right to marry. The government should pass a law allowing same sex marriages. Homosexual people should be able to marry because most people support same sex marriages, they constitution is based on equality and depriving the from marrying is taking away those rights. Most people support homosexual marriage. Based on a polling from PewResearch Center ," based on polling in 2015 , a majority of Americans (55%) support same-sex marriage , compared with 39% who oppose it." …show more content…

The Heritage Heights states, " no state shall.... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The constitution is based on equality for everyone and the applying to everybody equally. Not allowing LGBT people to marry is taking away their human rights. Human rights that we all deserve. Same-sex marriage should be a law because they have the same right as all of us. Furthermore, the Supreme Court Justices said, " Justice Kennedy emphasized the dignity and equality not only of same-sex couples, but of their families and children. “Without the recognition, stability, and predictability marriage offers,” he wrote, the children of these couples “suffer the stigma of knowing their families are somehow lesser.” In order to have a stable family , they have to get married to create a unity between the families. Getting married allows the kids born with two same gender parents to have a view of what a family looks like. LGBT people deserve the same equality as all of us. However some people oppose same sex marriages because it goes against their religion beliefs

Show More
Related

Case Study: Obergefell Vs. Hodges

1334 Words | 6 Pages

The case looks to the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause to determine whether same-sex couples have the right to marry, and whether the right to same-sex marriage is a fundamental right. The case was decided and the judges ruled in a 5-4 majority that it is Unconstitutional for states to deny same-sex couples the right to marry, or to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages that were performed out-of-state. Justices that voted in favor of the decision are Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. The dissenting Justices are Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and

Read More

Case Study: Obergefell V. Hodges

478 Words | 2 Pages

Obergefell v Hodges 2015 Obergefell v Hodges (2015) is a landmark 5 to 4 decision in favor of legalizing gay marriage. James Obergefell petitioned the state 's ban on same sex marriage. He argued that it is a fundamental guaranteed under the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Read More

David Boonin's Response To Jeff Jordan

1192 Words | 5 Pages

David Boonin’s response to Jeff Jordan made great points. Boonin mentions that “marriage involves a public recognition of a personal relationship between two people and people who are married become eligible for various sorts of public benefits that are unavailable to unmarried couples” and that to take this away from homosexual couples makes it into a “public dilemma” (Boonin 247). I strongly agree with this claim, as it is basic to understand that regardless of your gender, race, or sexual orientation, you are entitled as a human to certain rights. It is a discrimination to try and retract this right from anyone because of their sexual orientation. Just as it would be to try and prevent marriages of different races or religious backgrounds.

Read More

Obergefell V. Hodges (2005)

2137 Words | 9 Pages

Hodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial

Read More

Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study

1057 Words | 5 Pages

This analyses that same sex couples should also have the right to marry. One of the reason why the supreme court sided with Loving was because “Decisions about marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can

Read More

Brief Summary Of Article By Jack Pitney

1287 Words | 6 Pages

Summary of Articles: Article 1: The author, Jack Pitney, asserts that Same-Sex Marriage is a topic disagreed upon by Americans: whether it is an issue of legality in the Constitution, and whether it should be up to states or the federal government to make a decision. Pitney finds that the minority party in Congress has often sought to oppose legislation by the majority party citing that it should be a states’ rights issue. Yet, when there is a change in the majority, the once-minority party hypocritically defends the issue as being up to the national government. Most politicians prior to 2012 agreed that the issue of Same-Sex marriage was answered by DOMA (1996), and that a piece of legislation by the Federal Government would violate the powers defined in the Constitution. Article 2: Pew Research Center finds that opposition to homosexual marriage hit a high after Bill Clinton signed the DOMA (1996) and continued to remain high until 2007.

Read More

Critical Analysis Essay On 13th Amendment

1228 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court eventually held it was unconstitutional for States to deny same-sex couples the right to marriage (United States Supreme Court, "Obergefell v. Hodges. " 681). However, the States' misuse of the Tenth Amendment to defend its unconstitutional acts is blatant, and those acts will have negative

Read More

Gay Marriage Oxymoron Lisa Schiffren

812 Words | 4 Pages

Since 1888 the U.S Supreme Court has declared 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all. In the article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees, “Men and Women of full age without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion has the right to marry and to found a family” (United Nations). People are entitled to equal rights as to marriage whom ever they

Read More

Conservative And Liberal View Of Abortion

1027 Words | 5 Pages

The debate around same-sex marriage was is a good idea to legalize it. I believe that same-sex marriage should be legal. I don’t think there is anything wrong with people of the same sex getting married. Now the concept of traditional marriage has changed and the power of love is more important than gender in my opinion.

Read More

Gay Marriage Is An Issue That Surrounds The Case Of Obergefell V.

1339 Words | 6 Pages

The Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the fourteenth amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, no matter if it involves two people of the same sex or a man and a woman. The right to marry is a fundamental liberty inherent to autonomy. There is no union more profound than marriage, for it supports the most intimate association between two people. This principle was fundamental in Griswold v. Connecticut, which held “the constitution protects the right of married couples to use contraception.” Next, the right to marry secures children and families through legal recognition to building a home and raising children.

Read More

Argument Against Civil Disobedience

533 Words | 3 Pages

It took the Supreme Court several years to make gay marriage legal, but they made it legal because it discriminated against the LBGTQ community. If a person of LBGTQ community chose to marry illegally that would have been a reason to go against what the law said, because it was an unjust law and it stands up for equality for

Read More

Has The Lgbt Community Being Helped With Acceptance

1110 Words | 5 Pages

The LGBT community should be left alone, because they are often bullied on a daily basis, risk of dying because of embarrassment to get medical help, or shunned and left homeless by coming out the their families or caretakers. Moreover, the Government somehow slowly is starting to gain the power to dictate what the community can or can not do. Do we really need laws to say if a person can marry someone

Read More

Gay Rights Argumentative Essay

819 Words | 4 Pages

In a long-sought victory for the gay rights movement, the Supreme Court ruled by a 5-4 vote that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. “No longer may this liberty be denied,” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the majority in the historic decision. “No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were.” Marriage is “keystone of our social order equal dignity in the eyes of the law.”

Read More

Gay Marriage Persuasive Research Paper Outline

1612 Words | 7 Pages

My second reason for supporting LGBT/ same-sex marriage is the reason for discrimination against marriage. The UDHR article number 7 illustrates that all people are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination. Furthermore, article 1 of the UDHR also indicates that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. We should act towards one another in a spirit of a brother. By denying the same right as anybody else just because you are different is a clear form of discrimination, and it goes against the constitution.

Read More

Thesis Statement For Gay Marriage Essay

934 Words | 4 Pages

Marriage has been a part of life since before the medieval times. For two individuals who adore each other and arrangement on spending whatever remains of their lives together, the usual impulse is to make it legitimate and get hitched. This being said same-sex marriage had been broadly talked about and bantered on if it ought to be sanctioned or not. It is segregating not to permit two individuals who need to get hitched because they are a gay person. Authorizing same-sex marriage would perceive the American long for equal rights for all.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Gay Rights

Related Topics

Open Document