The US and UK’s decision on going to war with Iraq in 2003 is one of the controversial debates discussed. The controversy being on whether or not this war was justifiable or not. Many people opposed the United States attack on Iraq for many limpid reasons. Some of these reasons being the reputation of the US, there was no real reason or excuse to go to war with Iraq, and it will result in many unjustified crimes committed by the United States.
In 2003 the Bush administration and its allied declared an invasion on Iraq with false accusations of dictator Saddam Hussein having possessions of weapons of mass destruction. It was declared that we had to invade Iraq in order to prevent Saddam Hussein from using these weapons which they believed he was going to use on his own people, and his neighboring countries. However this claim was proven false as there was no evidence of support, and apparently in the end there was no weapons of mass destruction. But it is funny
…show more content…
Obviously every war always involves the killing of innocent lives and many injustices crimes that are portrayed by previous wars in the past. First of all causing many deaths of innocent civilians for no apparent reasons as there was no apparent reason for going to war with Iraq is just unjustifiable. The war that happened for claims in which don't have any evidence caused many killings of innocent individuals and civilians. It was proven that after the Persian Gulf War in 1990 to 1991 many troops who fought in this war, and the people of Iraq, developed increased incidences of cancer and disabilities in newborn children was because of the radioactivity of the depleted uranium used in the weaponry to fight the war. Which may I say is the same weapon they used on the war against Iraq which will only cause more people with cancer and newborns with disabilities. And obviously more death in the hands of the