ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Jury Duty

902 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Advantage and disadvantage of jury in criminal trial

A jury is a group of twelve people that are over eighteen who determine if the accused is guilty at the end of a criminal trial. (fedcourt, 2023) If chosen from the electoral roll for jury duty, the person must attend unless they have a criminal record, a part of the legal system, have health reasons or served jury duty in the past twelve months. (Courts Administration Authority, 2023)
The jury system requires reform to avoid a repeat of the Chamberlain case as complex information can be too hard to understand and the accountability of jurors is not high when making their verdict. However, this may not be the case as jurors can be more sympathetic than judges and having twelve people decide on a verdict is better than one person.

In a trial, some of the information presented can be found too hard for jurors to understand. If the information is too complex for the jurors to understand, the jury's verdict may find the wrong party guilty and punish an innocent person. In the 2021-2022 financial year, 97% of judgements resulted in a guilty outcome. (Australian Bureau of statistics, 2023) Some of these cases most likely resulted in a guilty outcome as the jurors …show more content…

Jurors can be good to have on a criminal trial as they are more sympathetic when making their verdict. It is recognised that judges can be out of touch with regular society as they are seen to have grown up with more money than the regular society. (Sydney criminal lawyers, 2014) This means that people have a misconception that Judges have not grown up with normal human experiences so they don’t feel as sympathetic. It is also mentioned that Judges only make their decision based on the legal aspects of the case and do not take anything else into account. A jury that is made up of normal everyday people is seen to have experienced everyday human experiences therefore will recognise a human factor into account when making their

Show More
Related
515 Words | 3 Pages

Jurors should not know anything about a specific case and not follow public affairs and read the news (Doc F). When a person is selected to be part of a jury, they have to say an oath stating that they will not use their emotions to determine the verdict of a trial. If a juror is caught using their emotions, they will be fined for a crime called perjury. Since there are twelve people in a jury, there is a variation of opinions when the jury decides a verdict. But, a judge is more professional and knows how to only use the evidence provided and be less biased.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand, emotion and reason can be easily confused by a juror due to lack of knowledge. Not all jurors have knowledge on the law, therefore not

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

A jury is not trained to decide someone’s fate, which is why a judge, as a trained lawyer, should choose the

Read More
1285 Words | 6 Pages

A jury, by definition,

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

Of course, it is true that judges are seen as more professional than a jury; there have undoubtedly been times when even a judge may be blinded by his or her own prejudices. As stated by Joe Anderson in Document D, jurors often do not “buy into science fiction” when faced with an obvious case. In the case of the death of Caylee Anthony, the jurors were not bemused by any ungrounded evidence that could have caused Casey Anthony to be found guilty. Certainly in a case of such popularity it is expected that jurors will often have their own preconceived notions about the verdict, but in the end of this case, these jurors were able to put aside their own opinions and only take the hard facts into consideration. Of course, this is the job of a judge as well, but with just one person judging a trial, it is more likely that he or she will give in to his or her own conception of the case.

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

Based on results, less than two percent of civil and criminal cases are heard by jurors. (Doc. A) Our jury system is excelling because these are only serious cases that are being heard by our American Jury System which means we can be very selective in our jury members. In most criminal cases, defendants agree to a guilty plea or a plea bargain.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

As a result, the trial and the jury should be more objective. The jury's verdict on whether the defendant is guilty is essential to the operation of the jury system. Since their decision might have far-reaching effects, they have become an integral element of the trial process (Ruderman, 2020). However, this may also make jurors a troublesome part of the process since they may need to thoroughly examine the material or apply the right roof standards to hand down verdicts. 3 resolve these problems.

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

Like in “Twelve Angry Men” jurors did not talk their vote serious and only voted for the majority. “Oh. well… I think he’s guilty. I thought is was obvious. I mean nobody proved otherwise.” this shows juror two hesitate and only choosing with the

Read More
2053 Words | 9 Pages

Cultural and natural exchanges between the new and old worlds is referred to as the Columbian Exchange. The exchanges of technology, plants, animals, and diseases altered the ways of life for the upcoming generations. The exchange lasted throughout the years of expansion and discovery beginning in Columbus' discovery in 1492. The Columbian Exchange impacted the social and cultural makeup of both sides of the world. Developments in agricultural production, evolution of weaponry, decrease of death rates and increase of education are a few examples of the effect of the Columbian Exchange on both Europeans and Native Americans.

Read More
443 Words | 2 Pages

The jury system continued to evolve over a period of time and eventually the United States Constitution was written to govern the jury system. The Sixth and Seventh Amendments stated that we should have 12 members and the cases were to be resolved upon a unanimous verdict (Landsman & Holderman2010). In the 1970’s the court approved juries of 12 or fewer and a non-unanimous verdict in civil cases in federal court cases. Since the evolution of the judicial system it has become easier to get jurors to come to court to do their civil duty. A list is compiled of selected jurors from voter registration and driver’s license information from the state (United States Courts, n.d.).

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

People who make very poor decisions or are not very “street” smart as some people say have the potential to be making a decision that regards the rest of your life, which in many cases is very scary to the person on trial. In the play “Twelve Angry Men” juror 7 did not care at all whether he was found guilty or innocent. “ I’m a little sick of this whole thing already. We’re getting nowhere fast. Let’s break it up and go home.

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

A group of juror comprising of 12 men from diverse backgrounds began their early deliberations with 11 of ‘guilty’ and 1 of ‘not guilty’ verdicts. Juror 8 portrayed himself as a charismatic and high self-confident architect. Initially, Juror 1 who played the foreman positioned himself as self-appointed leader of the team in which has led his authority to be challenged as his leadership style lacked in drive and weak. In the contrary, Juror 8 is seen as the emergent leader considering his openness to probing conversations while remaining calm. Implying this openness to the present, it has become crucial that a good decision relies on knowledge, experience, thorough analysis and most importantly critical thinking.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

“With more than $1 trillion in student loans outstanding in this country , crippling debt is no longer confined to dropouts from for-profit colleges or graduate students who owe on many years of education”. Students or future college students are struggling to figure out solutions to pay off college debt. With rates increasing every year , it is becoming extremely difficult to receive an education and overcome tremendous debt at the same time. However , there are several possible solutions that can help solve the issue of high tuition fees. The first solution is to attend a group called the Scholarship Sharing.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

But in majority of the cases jurors are older. When the juror is younger they were more likely to find a defendant not guilty compared to the older juror. The evidence that would be compelling to me as a juror is when a small child is involved. There are so many cases now that shows how people are abusing the children and even killing them. While they are in a fit of rage.

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

They have to decide important matters, verdicts, without giving reasons about their decision (Hostettler, 2004); they can nullify a verdict even if the evidence is overwhelming (Joyce, 2013). Furthermore, juries are too expensive, prolong the length of the trial (Davies, 2015) and the guilty can walk free, while the innocent is convicted (Joyce, 2013). In addition, jurors should be representative of society, but it is not

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Jury Duty

Related Topics

Open Document