ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Network Neutrality

854 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: What is freedom of speech

One of the first hits, when network neutrality is searched, are websites who want to save network neutrality and present who are for and especially who are against. Network neutrality seems to be a hot topic all over the world, with important players involved like the big telecom companies on the one hand and companies like Facebook, Netflix and Mozilla Firefox on the other hand.
Network neutrality can be seen as a non-discrimination act against any website, content or application on the Internet. Internet service providers (ISP’S) are not allowed to discriminate; therefor every end user has equal access to all available information and applications, access to an open and free Internet.
In the present day the Internet is a huge part …show more content…

It means that they could block data that would not live up to their freedom of speech standards. Non-profit organization DemandProgress responded in the following way: Comcast and other opponents of network neutrality claim that under the First Amendment they can discriminate the speech of the Internet’s …show more content…

Defenders of net neutrality argue that when there would be no network neutrality several problems would arise, with the main issue discrimination of content and the breach of freedom of speech. First ISP’s could prefer the content and applications of one business over another business. It may block the content altogether or make consumers pay to access the content. Furthermore it may slow some websites down who burden the channel capacity, websites like Netflix could be slowed down and therefor will not be able to provide proper service to its customers. There also can be noted that with the equal access to the Internet innovation was possible, no matter if the start-up was a big or a small company, everybody had access. Websites and applications like Facebook, YouTube or Flickr could start up because of the free and open Internet; no help of ISP’s was involved. The last remark can be made by drawing a parallel to the telecom market, the telephone sector, here companies are not allowed to discriminate so why should they be able to do so on the internet. Overall there can be noted that when net neutrality falls out, equal access on the receiving and sending part of speech is shut

Show More
Related
2950 Words | 12 Pages

The FCC is a government agency that regulates the radio, television and phone industries. The Federal Communication Commission regulates interstate communication for instance wire, satellite and cable, and international communication. The FCC originated from The Communication Act of 1934, which abolished the Federal radio commission. The Communication Act of 1934 was the barrier for all the communications rules in place today. This act expanded on the authority of the FCC to regulate public airwaves in the United Stated.

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

He mentioned how the Internet is making people wanting quick information so they don’t have to read articles or think about any answers. Carr is talking based on his experience with the Internet, because he is including himself as one of the people who had been effected by the Internet. Any reader can notice the amount of first- hand knowledge on the Internet problem. Also, Carr spoke in his article “the Net is becoming a universal medium’’, that shows his readers that Carr is very relatable to anyone else using the Internet. This allows his readers to believe Carr’s judgment, that he used

Read More
1022 Words | 5 Pages

Though they both can agree that the internet creates a loss, they see it as two different losses, in which Carr’s argument complicates

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

Anonymous has no strictly defined philosophy, and internal dissent is a regular feature of the group.[2 ] A website associated with the group describes it as "an internet gathering" with "a very loose and decentralized command structure that operates on ideas rather than directives".[2] Gabriella Coleman writes of the group, "In some ways, it may be impossible to gauge the intent and motive of thousands of participants, many of who don 't even bother to leave a trace of their thoughts, motivations, and reactions. Among those that do, opinions vary considerably. "[13]

Read More
50 Words | 1 Pages

In 1950’s many lawsuits were filed in Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, Delaware and the District of Columbia on the same struggle of African American elementary school students who attended segregated schools. Despite differing somewhat in the details, all alleged a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Read More
288 Words | 2 Pages

It might take away a person’s ability to speak freely, or keep some books from being written. They wanted people’s rights

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

So naturally when looking to see what others have said about this text, it found that they were all mostly in favor of net neutrality. Gregory down talks a recent ruling by the FCC, that after research, seemed to be something he should be praising. This is what the FCC changes actually did, This decision is a major legal victory not only for the FCC, but for all internet users (including you, since you're reading this online), who will continue to benefit from the Commission's open internet rules. These rules safeguard the principle of net neutrality, by preventing internet service providers from abusing their gatekeeper role to block or interfere with the ability of users to access the content of their choosing.

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

Shant Sahakian, in the informative and opinionated piece, “Repeal of Net Neutrality is bad for Education, Business, and You,” written in Los Angeles Times, on November 30, 2017, argues that repealing, therefore ending net neutrality would be detrimental and “the end of the internet we have always known and loved”, and that ending net neutrality will be bad for education, business, and anyone who believes that the internet should be free and equal to use by all persons who use it today. Sahakian’s evidence consists of various references and indications to the fact that ending net neutrality will be the end to internet freedom and equality as wells as an end to the fairness and equal opportunity that net neutrality gives us today. Sahakian also

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

This section is an extension of the privacy act. It states that you have the right to say what you may. However, it is the same way with the freedom of speech. You are allowed to express your opinion on multiple topics. You cannot say anything that is sensitive or may cause a rally or fight.

Read More
1204 Words | 5 Pages

The article starts by defining intellectual freedom; it also establishes that American libraries are very efficient, and are a prime source for Americans to find information. It then furthers its purpose through establishing to the reader the link between Intellectual Freedom (IF) and Freedom of Speech. The source then gives a basic layout of its argument to the reader in the form of a chart. This helps the reader follow the author’s argument. The first theory that is discussed is the marketplace of ideas theory which states that ideas should be like products and compete with one another until eventually the dominant/best idea wins.

Read More
1303 Words | 6 Pages

Then he starts writing about the major issue in this essay; which is the internet. The author thinks that internet makes people more isolated. Then he provides the reader with reasoning behind his claims. Seife writes that, internet solves the audience issue, because the worldwide web is endless. Anybody can be reached from anywhere from the planet.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

Finally, we should not limit our rights to freedom of speech in America except for on the internet because it is unconstitutional. Some believe that we should limit our rights to freedom of speech because when the constitution was written there was not as many threats as there are today; however they are wrong because the constitution clearly states our rights to freedom of speech. In the constitution it states, “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech or of the press.” This means that the government can not make a law that ever goes against our freedom of speech. Later it says, “ and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine living in a world without any internet. Imagine the amount of trouble a person would require to go through in order to find out the simplest things. The internet nowadays has become an essential part of almost every human being’s life. Cutting the internet off for just one day my actually leave the world in a state of commotion. Every type of technology may be used in either a way that benefit’s a person, or a way that may harm a person.

Read More
2033 Words | 9 Pages

A free internet is not one that is unregulated nor is one that is strictly regulated. There exists an elusive measure existing the spectrum that must be fulfilled without tainting the uniqueness of the internet. Two key features of a free internet, net neutrality and online freedom of speech, must be maintained throughout. The internet, as it is now, has paved a new path for communication in the modern era.

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

The most important thing in media is the internet it’s the main component in the media I am very excited to talk about the importance of internet that interest me also interest you. The importance of internet and why it’s important for us?. They use this kind of medium to get information about all kinds topics they need”(Temmel,M (.n.d)).Also we use the internet to communicate with others, actually the internet help us to get many news via social media for example whatsapp and instagram and snap chat also many others apps help

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Network Neutrality

Related Topics

Open Document