ipl-logo

Persuasive Speech About Marijuana

752 Words4 Pages

Hey guys, from Cal State University of San Marcos, welcome to Views Through the Millennials. I'm Sandra Ramales. Every week, we discuss the present political issues but only through the eyes of the millennial generation. Each week, for one hour, we bring to light issues that our government face and our own personal opinions in the matter. So, stick around and learn a little about our government and maybe a little bit of history. Today's topic is something I'm sure will interest you and that is, Marijuana.

I'm sure you all know about the current state laws concerning marijuana and if you don't then let me inform you. We know medical marijuana has been legal since 1996 with Proposition 215, but it was only for medicinal purposes. As of Jan …show more content…

However, under federal law, marijuana is still illegal and treated like any other controlled substance. The federal government views marijuana as highly addictive and having no medical value. Recently, federal agencies have created guidelines and other policy memos to manage the conflict between federal and state laws regarding …show more content…

And no, I don't mean the products themselves or the process of creating the products. Just the simple act of the products moving from state to state. This clause has experienced some difficulties due to its lack of specificity.

For example, in Wickard v Filburn (1942), the Supreme Court assessed Congress' authority to regulate economic activities under the commerce clause, which reads in part: "The Congress shall have Power ... To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." The court decided that this power includes the authority to regulate activities that take place within a state but only if those activities affect interstate commerce, even if the activities do not meet a definition of "commerce".

Another example includes Gonzales v. Raich (2005), where the Supreme Court held that the commerce clause gave Congress authority to prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana, despite state law saying contrary. Their argument was that local use affected supply and demand in the national marijuana market, making the regulation of intrastate use "essential" to regulating the drug's national

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Controversial Court Case Of Ogden Vs. Gibbons

576 Words | 3 Pages

This court case focused on the Commerce Clause in Article

Read More

Supreme Court Case Study Of Gibbons V. Ogden (1824)

886 Words | 4 Pages

Webster argued the Constitution was design to settle such economic disputes between states. Allowing concurrent laws to conflict would be dangerous and contagious if not handled by the federal government. Attorney Writ supported the federal supremacy over these states was enumerated in the Constitution. Gibbons’ steamboats operated “among several states” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.), and the Commerce Clause states, “ Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among several States, and with Indian tribes” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.). Gibbons’ steamboats in fact operated in New Jersey and in New York; therefore it aptly applied in this situation.

Read More

Mccullouch V. Maryland Case Study

539 Words | 3 Pages

The regulation of interstate commerce was the subject of the case, Gibbons v. Ogden (1824). New York state laws allowed Aaron Ogden to charge crossing fees through his waterways via legal New York monopolies. Thomas Gibbons, a steamboat trader asserted that the state was prohibited from superseding Congress in regards to interstate commerce. The Court invalidated the New York law simultaneously, confirming Congress’ power to manage interstate commerce via the Commerce Clause. Justice Johnson believed reversing state laws that impeded interstate commerce was solely the role and power of the federal government.

Read More

Summary Of Heart Of Atlanta Motel V. United States

680 Words | 3 Pages

Currently, the commerce clause is more likely a condition that permits Congress to govern interstate commerce in which the actual large portion of the motel commodity trade is from the community and individuals, who are all coming from the state of Georgia. The complete rundown of the Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States in Section 2 expresses that the power of Congress over interstate commerce is not restricted to the control of business throughout the states. Under the effects of the interstate commerce test, the regulated activity does not itself have to be in interstate commerce for it to be subjected to federal regulation but can also be any local (intrastate) activity as long as it has an effect on interstate commerce. Theoretically, this test subjects a substantial amount of business activity in the United States to federal regulation (Cheeseman25). The commerce clause allows Congress to regulate interstate commerce and permits Congress to manage interstate business.

Read More

Gun Free School Zone Case Study

860 Words | 4 Pages

(Oyez). This information states that Rehnquist is arguing that the law is not related to the Commerce Clause and that the case is related to something local such as the local government or the state government should be handling. However, there is a different opinion about this case, the minority opinion by Stephen Gerald Breyer said the “Congress had a rational basis for finding a substantial connection between gun-related school violence and interstate commerce. Evidence exists that gun-related violence interferes with the quality of education in schools and education is related to economic viability.” (CaseBriefs).

Read More

Independent Business Vs Sebelius Case Analysis

707 Words | 3 Pages

Since 1824 when Chief Justice John Marshal declared that navigation was a part of commerce in Gibbons v. Ogden, the Court has repeatedly diminished state and individual rights, and has expanded Congressional commercial power. The decisions up till 2012 addressed the differences between direct and indirect effects on commerce, substantial effect on commerce, etc. However, none addressed the notion that an article must be “already existing” in order to be regulated. In National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius, Chief Justice Roberts claimed that Congress cannot create new items to regulate, and is limited to regulating already existing articles. He continued to say that all cases concerning the Commerce Clause have one thing in common, in that they all understand commerce as reaching activity.

Read More

Supreme Court Cases: The Heart Of Atlanta Motel

815 Words | 4 Pages

People of all ethnicities are coming in from different states putting motels in the position of needing to adhere to federal and congressional law. Most commerce has interstate properties forcing them to comply with federal regulation whether it be traveling persons, out of state advertising, import/export or outsourcing making purely local commerce almost a untrue. The clause is often paired with the Necessary and Proper Clause, the combination used to take a broad, expansive perspective of powers granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause. Dispute exists within the courts as to the range of these powers however; the effect of the Commerce Clause has varied significantly depending on the Supreme Court's interpretation. During the Marshall Court era, Commerce Clause interpretation empowered Congress to gain jurisdiction over numerous aspects of intrastate and interstate commerce as well as non-commerce.

Read More

John Marshall Supreme Court Cases

914 Words | 4 Pages

The Supreme Court ruled that under the clause, Congress had powers to regulate any part of commerce that crossed state lines. Since Gibbons v. Ogden, the Commerce Clause has provided Congress the foundation for comprehensive power over a mass of national issues (McBride, 2006). Gibbons v Ogden dealt with claims from rival steamboat franchises. Ogden received exclusive rights from New York to be the primary steamboat company to use the Hudson River between New York and New Jersey. Gibbons, another steamboat owner, didn’t feel as if Ogden can get exclusive rights.

Read More

Commerce Clause In Supreme Court Cases

1737 Words | 7 Pages

The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution, this clause endows Congress with the power to regulate commerce within the states. The application and intention of this clause has created great debate in American Constitutional law since its inception. Supreme Court cases such as Gibbons V. Ogden (1824), Champion V. Ames (1903), Wickard V. Filburn (1942) and The United States V. Morrison (2000) have all dealt with and set legal precedent in regard to the clause. However the implementation of the clause had never had been so widely scrutinized or debated than The United States V. Lopez (1995). The Supreme Court mishandled the decision regarding the implementation of the Commerce Clause in the case

Read More

Essay On The Commerce Clause

684 Words | 3 Pages

The Commerce clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foregin nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes”. This clause is one of the most fundamental powers delegated to congress by the founders. It has helped to seprate the powers between the federal governemtn and the states, along with the branches of governemtn and Judiciary. In simpler terms the commerce clause was to help regulate commerce among navigable waters.

Read More

States Interference In Foreign Affairs

328 Words | 2 Pages

The Court has also invalidated state laws under the so-called “dormant foreign commerce clause.” The Constitution provides that the “Congress shall have Power . . . To regulate commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes.” The courts have found that this provision not only grants “positive” power to Congress but also imposes “negative” limits upon the states. Obviously the foreign commerce clause does not prohibit every state law that has any effect on foreign commerce.

Read More

Federalism Vs California

628 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, the actions of the federal government should be deemed unnecessary and outrageous. Never the less. many states have passed laws recognizing the medical value of marijuana since

Read More

Informative Speech On Marijuana

1412 Words | 6 Pages

Jessada 5880476 Theme: Laws and Society. Topic: Marijuana legality. General Purpose: To inform my audience. Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience about why marijuana should become legal.

Read More

Argumentative Essay Federalism

944 Words | 4 Pages

An issue such as medical marijuana, the federal government allows states to make and enforce laws in their own states. States such as Washington, California,

Read More

Persuasive Speech On Legalizing Marijuana

984 Words | 4 Pages

Starting from the beginning, I will tell you what marijuana - also called grass, ganja, pot, and various other slang terms - is. Marijuana comes from the Indian hemp plant and is the greenish-brown mixture of the dried flowers of cannabis sativa. When I was younger I used to believe that speaking positively about Marijuana, makes you look like a bad personage or either worse, a criminal. This opinion was based on the false information media produced and on the government laws of my country. However, by enhancing my knowledge, I have decided that cannabis offers so much to humanity, that not only it has many benefits, it has to be legalized.

Read More

More about Persuasive Speech About Marijuana

Related Topics

Open Document