Peter Evans On Inerrancy Analysis

Stanley did not necessarily state directly whether he believed inerrancy to be true, however; he did explain that he believes the Bible to be infallible and says that is not the foundation of our rather, rather it should be Jesus. In his Freshman year at George State University, he took a literature course, and in this course without intending to; the professor dismantled every single student’s faith. They were discussing the existence of Adam and Eve, and pulled out the fact that the Adam and Eve story could be fabricated. With this class discussion, it had Stanley along with other students question, if other parts of the Bible were a myth. Going back to his belief status, he says that he believes the Adam and Eve story to be true, because Jesus actually quoted it to be true.

Al Mohler on the other hand does believe in classical inerrancy. He believes it necessary to get information of biblical authority. He states that, “ God has given revelation to us verbally and directly, and He is consistent with His own character and perfection.” Overall, he believes Biblical inerrancy should be fully embraced. Peter Evans claims that biblical inerrancy is not a way to describe the overall context of faith. He read a bible before with very diverse groups of opinions, but; that did not conform well to the data of the Bible. Inerrancy is not the word for the Bible rather for ways of acting. Overall, I agree with Stanley’s point of view because it really seemed more gravitated toward my generation. Indeed, the Bible is important but the overall significance of faith should be based on Jesus’ principles and the history that comes with